Towards a general theory of antirepresentationalism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 259-292

  Garzn, Francisco Calvo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949083824     PISSN: 00070882     EISSN: 14643537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axl007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bechtel, W. [1998]: 'Representations and Cognitive Explanations: Assessing the Dynamicist's Challenge in Cognitive Science', Cognitive Science, 22, pp. 295-318.
2. Bickhard, M. H. and Terveen, L. [1995]: Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution, New York: Elsevier Scientific.
3. Bickle, J. [2003]: Philosophy and Neuroscience. A Ruthlessly Reductive Approach, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4. Calvo Garzón, F. [2003]: 'Connectionist Semantics and the Collateral Information Challenge', Mind and Language, 18, pp. 77-94.
5. Calvo Garzón, F. [2004a]: 'Issues of Implementation Matter for Representation', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, pp. 397-8.
6. Calvo Garzón, F. [2004b]: 'Context-Free versus Context-Dependent Constituency Relations: A False Dichotomy', Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Tech. Report FS-04-03, Arlington, VA: AAAI Press, pp. 12-6.
7. Calvo Garzón, F. [submitted]: 'The Reactive Brain and the Extended Mind: A Fourth Position'.
8. Calvo Garzón, F. [in preparation]: 'The Collapse of Scientific Intentional Realism'.
9. Churchland, P. M. [1989]: A Neurocomputational Perspective, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Clark, A. [1997]: Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Clark, A. [2001]: 'Reasons, Robots and the Extended Mind', Mind and Language, 16, pp. 121-45.
12. Clark, A. and Grush, R. [1999]: 'Towards a Cognitive Robotics', Adaptive Behavior, 7, pp. 5-16.
13. Clark, A. and Toribio, J. [1994]: 'Doing Without Representing?', Synthese, 101, pp. 401-31.
14. Dietrich, E. and Markman, A. [2003]: 'Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations', Mind and Language, 18, pp. 95-119.
15. Erlhagen, W. and Schöner, G. [2002]: 'Dynamic Field Theory of Movement Preparation', Psychological Review, 109, pp. 545-72.
16. Freeman, W. J. [2000]: Neurodynamics. An Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Giunti, M. [1997]: Computation, Dynamics, and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Grush, R. [2004]: 'The Emulation Theory of Representation: Motor Control, Imagery, and Perception', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, pp. 377-442.
19. Haugeland, J. [1991]: 'Representational Genera', in W. M. Ramsey, S. P. Stich and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Hsi-wen Liu, D. [2003]: 'Reconsidering the Notion of Dynamical Systems Theory Resources as a Conceptual Framework', in R. Alterman and D. Kirsh (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 722-7.
21. Kelso, J. A. S. [1995]: Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Liu, J. and Newsome, W. [2000]: 'Somatosensation: Touching the Mind's Fingers', Current Biology, 10, R598-R600.
23. Llinás, R. and Churchland, P. S. (eds.) [1996]: The Mind-Brain Continuum, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Marcus, G. F. and Berent, I. [2003]: 'Are There Limits to Statistical Learning?', Science, 300, pp. 53-4.
25. Markman, A. and Dietrich, E. [2000a]: 'In Defense of Representation', Cognitive Psychology, 40, pp. 138-71.
26. Markman, A. and Dietrich, E. [2000b]: 'Extending the Classical View of Representation', Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 470-5.
27. Marr, D. [1982]: Vision, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
28. Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A. and Desimone, R. [1996]: 'Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque', Journal of Neuroscience, 16, pp. 5154-67.
29. Newell, A. and Simon, H. [1972]: Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. O'Reilly, R. and Munakata, Y. [2000]: Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Pelphrey, K. A. and Reznick, J. S. [2001]: 'Clothing a Model of Embodiment', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, p. 59.
32. Piaget, J. [1954]: The Construction of Reality in the Child, New York: Basic Books.
33. Port, R. and van Gelder, T. (eds.) [1995]: Mind in Motion, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Pylyshyn, Z. W. [1984]: Computation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Salzman, C. D., Murasugi, C., Britten, K. and Newsome, W. [1992]: 'Microstimulation in Visual Area MT: Effects on Direction Discrimination Performance', Journal of Neuroscience, 12, pp. 2331-55.
36. Scheutz, M. (ed.) [2002]: Computationalism: New Directions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Schöner, G., Kopecz, K. and Erlhagen, W. [1997]: 'The Dynamics Neural Field Theory of Motor Programming: Arm and Eye Movements', in P. G. Morasso and V. Sanguineti (eds.), Self-Organization, Computational Maps, and Motor Control, Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.
38. Spencer, J. P. and Schöner, G. [2003]: 'Bridging the Representational Gap in the Dynamic Systems Approach to Development', Developmental Science, 6, pp. 392-412.
39. Thelen, E. and Bates, E. [2003]: 'Connectionism and Dynamic Systems: Are They Really Different?', Developmental Science, 6, pp. 378-91.
40. Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C. and Smith, L. [2001]: 'The Dynamics of Embodiment: A Field Theory of Infant Perseverative Reaching', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, pp. 1-86.
41. Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. [1994]: A Dynamics Systems Approach to the Development of Perception and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Thelen, E. and Whitmyer, V. [2005]: 'Using Dynamic Field Theory to Conceptualize the Interface of Perception, Cognition, and Action', in J. J. Rieser, J. J. Lockmanand C. A. Nelson (eds.), Action as an Organizer of Learning and Development (Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. van Gelder, T. [1991]: 'What is the 'D' in 'PDP'? A Survey of the Concept of Distribution', in W. Ramsey, S. Stich and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. van Gelder, T. [1995]: 'What Might Cognition Be, if not Computation?', Journal of Philosophy, 92, pp. 345-81.
45. van Gelder, T. [1998]: 'The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, pp. 615-65.
46. Wheeler, M. and Clark, A. [1999]: 'Genic Representation: Reconciling Content and Causal Complexity', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, pp. 103-35.