Improved turbulence generation techniques for hybrid RANS/LES calculations

Journal of Turbulence

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-20

  De Prisco, G ^a   Piomelli, U ^a   Keating, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid RANS LES; Large eddy simulation

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; TURBULENCE;

BOUNDARY LAYER; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW MODELING; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHOD; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENCE;

EID: 50849106040     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14685248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14685240701787744     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Batten, P., Goldberg, U. and Chakravarthy, S. (2004) Interfacing statistical turbulence closures with large-eddy simulation. AIAA J., 42, pp. 485-492.
2. Bradshaw, P., Ferriss, D. A. and Atwell, N. P. (1967) Calculation of boundary layer development using the turbulent energy equation. Fluid J. Mech., 23, pp. 31-64.
3. Davidson, L. (2005) Hybrid les-rans: Inlet boundary conditions. 3rd National Conference on Computational Mechanics-MekIT1905, pp. 7-22.
4. De Prisco, G., Keating, A. and Piomelli, U. (2007) Large-eddy simulation of accelerating boundary layers
5. Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. and Cabot, W. H. (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A, 3, pp. 1760-1765.
6. Keating, A., De Prisco, G. and Piomelli, U. (2006) Interface conditions for hybrid RANS/LES calculations. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 27, pp. 777-788.
7. Keating, A., De Prisco, G., Piomelli, U. and Balaras, E. (2005) Interface conditions for hybrid RANS/LES simulations. Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments 6, pp. 349-358. Elsevier
8. Keating, A. and Piomelli, U. (2006) A dynamic stochastic forcing method as a wall-layer model for large-eddy simulation. Turbul J., 7:12, pp. 1-24.
9. Keating, A., Piomelli, U., Balaras, E. and Kaltenbach, H.-J. (2004) A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 16:12, pp. 4696-4712.
10. Kim, J. and Moin, P. (1985) Application of a fractional step method to incompressible navier-stokes equations. Comput J. Phys., 59, pp. 308-323.
11. Klein, M., Sadkiki, A. and Janicka, J. (2003) A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. Comput J. Phys., 186, pp. 652-665.
12. Le, H., Moin, P. and Kim, J. J. (1997) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. Fluid J. Mech., 330, pp. 349-374.
13. Lee, S., Lele, S. K. and Moin, P. (1992) Simulation of spatially evolving compressible turbulence and application of taylors hypothesis. Phys. Fluids A, 4, pp. 1521-1530.
14. Lund, T. S., Wu, X. and Squires, K. D. (1998) Generation of inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. Comput J. Phys., 140, pp. 233-258.
15. Mathey, F., Cokljat, D., Bertoglio, J.-P. and Sergent, E. (2006) Assessment of the vortex method for large-eddy simulation inlet conditions. Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 6, pp. 59-67.
16. Meneveau, C., Lund, T. S. and Cabot, W. H. (1996) A lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. Fluid J. Mech., 319, pp. 353-385.
17. Menter, F. R. (1997) Eddy viscosity transport equations and their relation to the k - ∈ model. ASME J. Fluids Engng, 119, pp. 876-884.
18. Na, Y. and Moin, P. (1998) Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. Fluid J. Mech., 374, pp. 379-405.
19. Orlanski, I. (1976) A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. Comput J. Phys., 21, pp. 251-269.
20. Piomelli, U. and Balaras, E. (2002) Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 34, pp. 349-374.
21. Sandham, N. D., Yao, Y. F. and Lawal, A. A. (2004) Large-eddy simulation of transonic turbulent flow over a bump. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24, pp. 584-595.
22. Schluter, J. U., Wu, X., Kim, S., Alonso, J. J. and Pitsch, H. (2004) Coupled RANS-LES computation of a compressor and combustor in a gas turbine engine
23. Schluter, J. U., Pitsch, H. and Moin, P. (2004) LES inflow conditions for coupling with Reynolds-averaged flow solvers. AIAA J., 42, pp. 478-484.
24. Smirnov, A., Shi, S. and Celik, I. (2001) Random flow generation technique for large eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modeling. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, pp. 359-371.
25. Spalart, P. R. (2000) Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 21, pp. 252-263.
26. Spalart, P. R., Jou, W. H., Strelets, Kh. M. and Allmaras, S. R. (1997) Comments on the feasibility of les for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach, Advances in DNS/LES, pp. 137-148. Greyden Press
27. Spalart, P. R. and Allmaras, S. R. (1994) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche A'erospatiale, 1, pp. 5-21.
28. Spalart, P. R., Deck, S., Shur, M. L., Squires, K. D., Strelets, M. Kh. and Travin, A. (2006) A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 20, pp. 181-195.
29. Spille-Kohoff, A. and Kaltenbach, H.-J. (2001) Generation of turbulent inflow data with a prescribed shear-stress profile. DNS/LES Progress and Challenges, pp. 319-326. Greyden Press, Columbus, OH
30. Terracol, M. (2005) A zonal RANS/LES approach for noise sources prediction, Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments, Vol 6, pp. 699-708. Elsevier, Amsterdam
31. Warnack, D. and Fernholz, H. H. (1998) The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. The boundary layer with relaminarization. Fluid J. Mech., 359, pp. 357-371.