Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations

International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 252-263

  Spalart, P R ^a  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerodynamics; Simulation; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; SIMULATION MODEL; SIMULATION; TURBULENT FLOW;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; UNSTEADY FLOW;

DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; REYNOLDS-AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES (RANS) EQUATIONS;

TURBULENT FLOW;

AERODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; TURBULENCE;

EID: 0034083480     PISSN: 0142727X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00007-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Adams N.A. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent compression ramp flow. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 12:1998;102.
2. Alam, M., Sandham, N.D., 2000. Direct numerical simulation of 'short' Laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 223.
3. Aubrun, S., Kao, P.L., HaMinh, H., Boisson, H., 1999. The semi-deterministic approach as way to study coherent structures. Case of a turbulent flow behind a backward-facing step. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, 24-26 May, Corscia, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. Balaras E., Benocci C., Piomelli U. Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations. AIAA J. 34(6):1996;1111.
5. Baldwin, B.S., Barth, T.J., 1991. A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows. AIAA-91-0610.
6. Bosch G., Rodi W. Simulation of vortex shedding past a square cylinder with different turbulence models. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids. 28:1998;601.
7. Breuer, M., 1999. A challenging test case for large eddy simulation: high Reynolds number circular cylinder flow. In: Banerjee, S., Eaton, J.K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flow Phenomena I, 12-15 September. Santa Barbara, pp. 735-740.
8. Cazalbou J.B., Spalart P.R., Bradshaw P. On the behavior of two-equation models at the edge of a turbulent region. Phys. Fluids A. 6(5):1994;1797.
9. Chapman D.R. Computational aerodynamics development and outlook. AIAA J. 17(12):1979;1293.
10. Childs, R.E., Nixon, D., 1987. Turbulence and fluid/acoustic interaction in impinging jets. SAE 87-2345.
11. Coleman G.N., Ferziger J.H., Spalart P.R. A numerical study of the turbulent Ekman layer. J. Fluid Mech. 213:1990;313.
12. Coleman G.N., Kim J., Moser R.D. A numerical study of turbulent supersonic isothermal-wall channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 305:1995;159.
13. Deardorff J.W. A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 41:1970;453.
14. 2 model AIAA J. 33(4):1995;659.
15. Durst, F., Launder, B.E., Schmidt, F.W., Whitelaw, J. H., Lesieur, M., Binder, G. (Eds.), 1997. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Turbullent Shear Flows, 8-10 September. Grenoble, France.
16. Fureby C., Tabor G., Weller H.G., Gosman A.D. A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 9(5):1997;1416.
17. Fureby C., Grinstein F.F. Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows. AIAA J. 37(5):1999;544.
18. Gavrilakis S. Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow through a straight square duct. J. Fluid Mech. 244:1992;101.
19. Gessner, F.B., Eppich, H.M., Lund, E.G., 1991. The near-wall structure of turbulent flow along a streamwise corner. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, 9-11 September, Munich.
20. t -92. Ecolen Science Research Center, Moscow (Preprint No. 3).
21. Hellström, T., Davidson, L., Rizzi, A., 1994. Reynolds stress transport modelling of transonic flow around the RAE2822 airfoil. AIAA 94-0309.
22. Huerre P., Monkewitz P.A. Absolute and convective instabilities in free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 159:1985;151.
23. Hunt, J.C.R. 1990. Developments in computational modelling of turbulent flows. In: Proc. ERCOFTAC Work, 26-28 March, Lausanne, Switzerland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Johansson S.H., Davidson L., Olsson E. Numerical simulation of vortex shedding past triangular cylinders at high Reynolds number using a k-. ε turbulence model Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids. 16:1993;859.
25. Jordan S.A., Ragab S.A. A large-eddy simulation of the near wake of a circular cylinder. J. Fluids Engrg. 120:1998;243.
26. Karniadakis G.E., Triantafyllou G.S. Three-dimensional dynamics and transition to turbulence in the wake of bluff objects. J. Fluid Mech. 238:1992;1.
27. Kato, M., Launder, B.E., 1993. The modelling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders. In: Ninth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Kyoto.
28. Launder, B.E., 1988. Turbulence modelling in three-dimensional shear flows. AGARD CP-438, Fluid Dynamics 3D Turbulent Shear Flows and Transition, 3-6 October. Turkey.
29. Lien, F.S., Leschziner, M.A., 1995. Modelling 2D separation from a high lift aerofoil with a non-linear eddy-viscosity model and second-moment closure. Aero. J. 125.
30. Menter F.R. Influence of freestream values on k-. ω turbulence model predictions AIAA J. 30(6):1992;1657.
31. Mittal R., Balachandar S. Effect of three-dimensionality on the lift and drag of nominally two-dimensional cylinders. Phys. Fluids. 7(8):1995;1841.
32. Moin P., Kim J. Tackling turbulence with supercomputers. Scient. Amer. 276(1):1997;62.
33. τ=590 Phys. Fluids. 11(4):1999;943.
34. Na Y., Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 370:1998;175.
35. Najjar F.M., Vanka S.P. Effects of intrinsic three-dimensionality on the drag characteristics of a normal flat plate. Phys. Fluids. 7(10):1995;2516.
36. Najjar F.M., Balachandar S. Low-frequency unsteadiness in the wake of a normal flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 370:1998;101.
37. Nikitin, N.V., Nicoud, F., Wasistho, B., Squires, K.D., Spalart, P.R., 2000. An approach to wall modeling in large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids (submitted).
38. Orszag, S.A., Borue, V., Flannery, W.S., Tomboulides, A.G., 1997. Recent successes, current problems, and future prospects of CFD. AIAA-97-0431.
39. Perot B. Turbulence modeling using body force potentials. Phys. Fluids. 11(9):1999;2645.
40. Ragab S., Sreedhar M. Numerical simulation of vortices with axial velocity deficits. Phys. Fluids. 7(3):1995;549.
41. Rodi W., Ferziger J.H., Breuer M., Pourquié M. Status of large eddy simulation: results of a workshop. J. Fluids Engrg. 119:1997;248.
42. Schumann U. Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J. Comp. Phys. 18:1975;376.
43. Shur, M., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M., Travin, A., 1999. Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, 24-26 May, Corsia, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
44. Shur, M.L., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M.Kh., Travin, A.K., 1996. Navier-Stokes simulation of shedding turbulent flow past a circular cylinder and a cylinder with a backward splitter plate. In: Third European CFD Conference, Paris.
45. Shur, M., Strelets, M., Zaikov, L., Gulyaev, A., Kozlov, V., Secundov, A., 1995. Comparative numerical testing of one- and two-equation turbulence models for flows with separation and reattachment. AIAA-95-0863.
46. Spalart, P.R., 1988. Direct numerical study of leading-edge contamination. AGARD CP 438.
47. θ=1410 J. Fluid Mech. 187:1988;61.
48. Spalart P.R., Allmaras S.R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aérospatiale. 1:1994;5.
49. Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R., 1997. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In: Liu, C., Liu, Z. (Eds.), First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, 4-8 August, Ruston, LA, Advances in DNS/LES, Greyden Press, Columbus, OH.
50. Spalart P.R., Shur M. On the sensitization of simple turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Sci. Technol. 1(5):1997;297.
51. Spalart P.R., Strelets M.Kh. Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 403:2000;329-349.
52. Speziale C.G. On nonlinear K-l and K-. ε models of turbulence J. Fluid Mech. 178:1987;459.
53. Speziale C.G. Turbulence modeling for time-dependent RANS and VLES: a review. AIAA J. 36(2):1998;173.
54. Travin, A., Shur, M., Strelets, M., Spalart, P.R., 2000. Detached-eddy simulations past a circular cylinder. Flow, Turb. Combust, to appear.
55. Wilcox, D.C., 1998. Turbulence modeling for CFD. http://webknx.com/dcw.
56. Yang K.-S., Ferziger J.H. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent obstacle flow using a dynamic subgrid-scale model. AIAA J. 31(8):1993;1406.
57. Ying S.X., Spaid F.W., McGinley C.B., Rumsey C.L. Investigation of confluent boundary layers in high-lift flows. J. Aircraft. 36(3):1999;550.
58. Zeman O. The persistence of trailing vortices: a modeling study. Phys. Fluids A. 7:1995;135.