Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 760-772

  Goikoetxea, Edurne ^a   Pascual, Gema ^a   Acha, Joana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SPAIN;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SPAIN; VOCABULARY;

EID: 50849088614     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.760     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. AU, T. K. (1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The causes and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 104-122.
2. BADECKER, W., & STRAUB. K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphora. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 748-769.
3. BORZONE, A. M., & SILVA, M. L. (2007). La resolucion de anáforas en niños: Incidencia de la causalidad implicite de los verbos [The resolution of anaphoras in children: Incidence of implicit causality of verbs]. Revista de Filosofia y Psicología, 15, 81-100.
4. BROWN, R., & FISH, D. (1983a). Are there universal schemas of psychological causality"? Archives de Psychologie, 51, 145-153.
5. BROWN, R., & FISH, D. (1983b). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
6. CARAMAZZA, A., GROBER, E., GARVEY, C., & YATES, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 601-609.
7. CARREIRAS, M., & ALONSO, M. A. (1999). Comprension de anáforas [Understanding anaphora]. In M. de Vega & F. Cuetos (Eds.), Psicolingūistica del español (pp. 205-230). Madrid: Trotta.
8. CARREIRAS, M., GARNHAM, A., & OAKHILL, J. (1996). Understanding anaphora: The role of superficial and conceptual information. In M. Carreiras, J. E. Garcia-Albea, & N. Sebastian-Galles (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 241-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,
9. CLIFTON, C., JR., & DUFFY, S. A. (2001). Sentence and text comprehension: Roles of linguistic structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 167-196.
10. CORRIGAN, R. (2001). Implicit causality in language: Event participants and their interactions. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 20, 285-320.
11. CORRIGAN, R., & STEVENSON, C. (1994). Children's causal attributions to states and events described by different classes of verbs. Cognitive Development, 9, 235-256.
12. DE VEGA, M. (2005). El procesamiento de oraciones con conectores adversatives y causales [Processing of sentences with causal or adversative connectives]. Cognitive, 17, 85-108.
13. EHRLICH, M. F., REMOND, M., & TARDIEU, H. (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading & Writing, 11, 29-63.
14. FILLMORE, C. J. (1971). Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 272-296). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
16. FRANCO, R, & ARCURI, L. (1990). Effect of semantic valence on implicit causality of verbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 161-170.
17. FRAZIER, L., CLIFTON, C., & RANDALL, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 13, 187-222.
18. GARNHAM, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. New York: Psychology Press.
19. GARNHAM, A., & OAKHILL, J. (1985). On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 385-393.
20. GARNHAM, A., OAKHILL, J., & CRUTTENDEN, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language & Cognitive Processes, 7, 231-255.
21. GARNHAM, A., TRAXLER, M., OAKHILL, J., & GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 517-543.
22. GARROD, S., FREUDENTHAL, D., & BOYLE, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphors in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 39-68.
23. GARROD, S., & TERRAS, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 526-544.
24. GARVEY, C., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1974). Implicit causality hi verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459-464.
25. GARVEY, C., CARAMAZZA, A., & YATES, J. (1974-1975). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227-243.
26. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99-156.
27. GONZÁLEZ, J., CERVERA, T., & MIRALLES, J. L. (1997). El efecto de la distancia en la comprension escrita de los demostrativos con valor anaforico [Effects of the distance on the comprehension of anaphoric demonstratives]. Psicothema, 9, 311-321.
28. GRAESSER, A. C., MILLIS, K. K., & ZWAAN, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
29. GREENE, S. B., MCKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 266-283.
30. GROBER, E. H., BEARDSLEY, W., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 6, 117-133.
31. GUERRY, M., GIMENES, M., CAPLAN, D., & RIGALLEAU, F. (2006). How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1535-1555.
32. HEIDER, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
33. HUFFMAN, C., & TCHIR, M. A. (1990). Interpersonal verbs and dispositional adjectives: The psychology of causality embodied in language. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 58, 765-778.
34. KASOF, J., & LEE, J. Y. (1993). Implicit causality as implicit salience. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 877-891.
35. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
36. KINTSCH, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. LAFRANCE, M., BROWNELL, H., & HAHN, E. (1997). Interpersonal verbs, gender, and implicit causality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 138-152.
38. LONG, D. L., & DE LEY, L. (2000). Implicit causality and discourse focus: The interaction of text and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 526-570.
39. MALLE, B. F. (2002). Verbs of interpersonal causality and the folk theory of mind and behavior. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp. 57-83). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. MANNETTI, L., & DE GRADA, E. (1991). Interpersonal verbs: Implicit causality of action verbs and contextual factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 429-443.
41. MCDONALD, J. L., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 543-566.
42. MCKOON, G., GREENE, S. B., & RATCLIFF, R. (1993). Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1040-1052.
43. MCKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1988). Contextually relevant aspects of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 331-343.
44. PANDELAERE, M., HOORENS, V., & PEETERS, G. (2003). Why ask about Peter? Do you think he caused it? How the description of causal events guides the selection of questions about them. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 291-297.
45. RINCK, M., & BOWER, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 110-131.
46. RUDOLPH, U. (1997). Implicit verb causality: Verbal schemas and covariation information. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 16, 132-158.
47. RUDOLPH, U., & FORSTERLING, F. (1997a). The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 192-218.
48. RUDOLPH, U., & FÖRSTERLING, F. (1997b). Zur impliziten kausalität in sprache: Kriterien zur selection von Stimulusmaterial in Studien zur verbkausalität [The implicit causality in language: On the selection of stimulus materials in studies on verb causality]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 293-304.
49. RUDOLPH, U., & VON HECKER, U. (2006). Three principles of explanation: Verb schemas, balance, and imbalance repair. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 25, 377-405.
50. SANFORD, A. J., & GARROD, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, 235-262.
51. SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N., MARTÍ, M. A., CUETOS, F., & CARREIRAS, M. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español [LEXESP: A computerized database of Spanish]. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
52. SHUM, G. (1993). El pronombre en el lenguaje formal del niño [Pronouns in children's formal language], Infancia & Aprendizaje, 61, 107-121.
53. SHUM, G., CONDE, A., & DÍAZ, C. (1992). Pautas de adquisición y uso del pronombre personal en lengua española. Un estudio longitudinal [Patterns in the acquisition and use of the personal pronoun in the Spanish language: A longitudinal study]. Estudios de Psicologíla, 48, 67-86.
54. STEWART, A. J., PICKERING, M. J., & SANFORD, A. J. (2000). The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 423-443.
55. STURT, P., SCHEEPERS, C., & PICKERING, M. (2002). Syntactic ambiguity resolution after initial misanalysis: The role of recency. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 371-390.
56. YUILL, N., & OAKHILL, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 173-186.