How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1535-1555

  Guerry, Michèle ^a,c   Gimenes, Manuel ^a   Caplan, David ^b   Rigalleau, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INTERNET; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INTERNET; MALE; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33746841530     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500269105     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748-765.
2. Au,T. K. (1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The causes and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104-122.
3. Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., &Yates,J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601-609.
4. Chesnet, D., Guillabert, F., & Esperet, E. (1994). G-Studio: un logiciel pour l'étude en temps réel des paramètres en temps réel de la production écrite. L'Année Psychologue, 94, 283-294.
5. Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 121-131.
6. Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholog, 32A, 247-255.
7. Garnham, A. (1989). Integrating information in text comprehension: The interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 359-399). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Garnham, A (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 231-255.
10. Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J. V., & Gernsbacher, M. A (1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 517-543.
11. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 77-90.
12. Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459-464.
13. Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1975). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227-243.
14. Greene, S. B., & McKoon, G. (1995). Telling something we can't know: Experimental approaches to verbs exhibiting implicit causality. Psychological Science, 6, 262-270.
15. Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 266-283.
16. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Levin, B. (1993). English verb chases and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., & Koster, C. (1993). Integrative processes in utterance resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 647-666.
20. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543-566.
21. McKoon, G., Greene, S. B., & Ratcliff, R. (1993). Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1040-1052.
22. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du Francais contemporain sur Internet. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-452.
23. Osgood, C. E. (1970). Interpersonal verbs and interpersonal behavior. In J. L. Cowan (Ed.), Studies in thought and language (pp. 133-228). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
24. Rigalleau, F., & Caplan, D. (2000). Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 23-52.
25. Rigalleau, F., & Caplan, D. (2004). A deficit of automatic pronominal coindexation in aphasie patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 181-213.
26. Rigalleau, F., Caplan, D., & Baudiffier, V. (2004). New arguments in favor of an automatic pronominal coindexation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 893-933.
27. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 423-443.