Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring

Reading and Writing

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 29-63

  Ehrlich, Marie France ^a,c   Remond, Martine ^b   Tardieu, Hubert ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b Institut National de Recherche Pedagogique   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Anaphor processing; Developmental psycholinguistics; Metacognition; Metalinguistics; Reading comprehension; Reading skills

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009996615     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007996502372     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aubret, J. (1986). Traitement syntaxique et sémantique de textes et différences individuelles [Syntactic and semantic processing of texts and individual differences], Revue de Psychologie Appliquée 36: 447-468.
2. Aubret, J. & Blanchard, S. (1991). L'évaluation des compétences d'un lecteur [The assessment of reading abilities]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
3. Aubret, F., Demangeon, M., Larcebeau, S. & Pelnard-Considere, J. (1981). Révision et étude de quelques tests [The revision and the study of some tests], Document du service de Recherches de l'INOP 1: 99-107.
4. Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency and type of standard, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 289-311.
5. Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader, Educational Psychology Review 1: 3-38.
6. Baker, L. (1994). Fostering metacognitive development. In H.W. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 25 (pp. 201-239). San Diego: Academic Press.
7. Baker, L. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr & P. Mosenthal (eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
8. Baker, L. & Zimli, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 340-346.
9. Beal, C.R. (1990). The development of text evaluation and revision skills, Child Development 61: 247-258.
10. Beal, C.R., Garrod, A.C. & Bonitatibus, G.J. (1990). Fostering children's revision skills through training in comprehension monitoring, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 275-280.
11. Carr, T.H. (1981). Building theories of reading ability: On the relation between individual differences in cognitive skills and reading comprehension, Cognition 9: 73-114.
12. Carr, M., Borkowski, J.G. & Maxwell, S.E. (1991). Motivational components of underachievement, Developmental Psychology 27: 108-118.
13. Carr, T.H., Brown, T.L., Vavrus, L.G. & Evans, M.A. (1990). Cognitive skill maps and cognitive skill profiles: Componential analysis of individual differences in children's reading efficiency. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 1-55). New York: Academic Press.
14. Claes, M., Dehant, A., Lamy, J. & Gille, A. (1967). Test de lecture California [California reading test]. Bruxelles: Editest.
15. Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R. & Pazzaglia, F. (1996). Profiles of reading comprehension difficulties: An analysis of single cases. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 113-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cox, B.E., Shanahan, T. & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers' use of cohesion in writing, Reading Research Quarterly 25: 47-64.
17. DeSoto, J.L. & DeSoto, C.B. (1983). Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities, Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 116-127.
18. Ehrlich, M.-F. (1996). Metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphoric devices in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. In C. Cornoldi and J. Oakhill (eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 221-249). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Ehrlich, M.-F., Kurtz-Costes, B. & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers, Journal of Reading Behavior 25: 365-381.
20. Ehrlich, M.-F., Kurtz-Costes, B., Rémond, M. & Loridant, C. (1995). Les différences individuelles dans la compréhension de l'écrit: facteurs cognitivo-linguistiques et motivationnels [Individual differences in reading comprehension: cognitivo-linguistic and motivational factors], Cahiers d'acquisition et de pathologie du langage 13: 37-58.
21. Ehrlich, M.-F. & Rémond M. (1997). Skilled and less skilled comprehenders: French children's processing of anaphoric devices in written texts, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15: 291-309.
22. Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Flavell, J.H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In P. Dickson (ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
24. Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood: Ablex.
26. Garrod, S.C. & Sanford, A.J. (1985). On the real-time character of interpretation during reading, Language and Cognitive Processes 1: 43-59.
27. Glenberg, A.M. & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11: 702-718.
28. Glenberg, A.M. & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension, Memory and Cognition 15: 84-93.
29. Greene, S.B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18: 266-283.
30. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 7: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
31. Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
32. Harris, P.L., Kruithof, A., Meerum Terwogt, M. & Visser, T. (1981). Children's detection and awareness of textual anomaly, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 212-230.
33. Hickmann, M. & Schneider, P. (1993). Children's ability to restore the referential cohesion of stones, First Language 13: 169-202.
34. INETOP (1981). Test de lecture silencieuse [Silent reading test]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
35. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From metaprocesses to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data, Cognition 23: 95-147.
36. Kurtz-Costes, B., Ehrlich, M.-F., McCall, R.J. & Loridant, C. (1995). Motivational determinants of reading comprehension: a comparison of French, Caucasian-American, and African-American Adolescents, Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 351-364.
37. Leather, C.V. & Henry, L.A. (1994). Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 58: 88-111.
38. Lefavrais, P. (1986). La pipe et le rat [The pipe and the rat]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
39. Maki, R.H. & Serra, M. (1992). The basis of test predictions for text material, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16: 609-616.
40. Markman, E.M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation, Child Development 48: 986-992.
41. Markman, E.M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies, Child Development 50: 643-655.
42. Nelson, T.O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions, Psychological Bulletin 95: 109-133.
43. Oakhill, J.V. (1994). Individual differences in children's text comprehension. In M.A. Gemsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 821-848). New York: Academic Press.
44. Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less skilled comprehenders: effects of memory load and inferential complexity, Language and Speech 29: 25-37.
45. Papetti, O., Cornoldi, C., Pettavino, A., Mazzoni, G. & Borkowski, J. (1992). Memory judgments and allocation of study times in good and poor comprehenders, Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities 7: 3-33.
46. Paris, S.G. & Oka, E.R. (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review 6: 25-56.
47. Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Tressoldi, P.E. (1993). Learning to read: Evidence on the distinction between decoding and comprehension skills, European Journal of Psychology of Education 8: 247-258.
48. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849-894). New York: Academic Press.
50. Saarnio, D.A., Oka, E.R. & Paris, S.G. (1990). Developmental predictors of children's reading comprehension. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development: A component skills approach (pp. 57-79). New York: Academic Press.
51. Seigneurie, A., Ehrlich, M.-F., Oakhill, J.V. & Yuill, N.M. (1997, submitted). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension.
52. Stanovich, K.E., Nathan, R.G. & Vala-Rossi, M. (1986). Developmental changes in the cognitive correlates of reading ability and the developmental lag hypothesis, Reading Research Quarterly 21: 267-283.
53. Tyler, L.K. (1983). The development of discourse mapping processes: The on-line interpretation of anaphoric expressions, Cognition 13: 309-341.
54. Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders, British Journal of Psychology 79: 173-186.
55. Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Zabrucky, K. & Moore, D. (1989). Children's ability to use three standards to evaluate their comprehension of text, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 336-352.
57. Zabrucky, K. & Ratner, H.H. (1986). Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories, Child Development 57: 1401-1418.