Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 14, 2008, Pages

  Kato, Minori ^a   Nakamura, Hiroaki ^a   Konishi, Sadahiko ^a   Dohzono, Sho ^a   Toyoda, Hiromitsu ^a   Fukushima, Wakaba ^b   Kondo, Kyoko ^b   Matsuda, Hideki ^c  

^a OSAKA CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c Ishikiriseiki Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial pain; Cervical myelopathy; Cervical spine; Laminoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LAMINOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYALGIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; AGED; AXIS; CERVICAL SPINE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPINE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AXIS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 50649093838     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178e607     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 1988;13:870-6.
2. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003: 129-39.
3. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
4. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br1995;77:956-61.
5. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, et al. Cervical curvature after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy-involvement of yellow ligament, semispinalis cervicis muscle, and nuchal ligament. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:26-30.
6. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y. Atrophy of the nuchal muscle and change in cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996;115:203-5.
7. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 1996;21:1969-73.
8. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 2002;27:1414-8.
9. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, et al. Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:392-5.
10. Saita K, Hoshino K. Complaint of nuchal pain following cervical laminoplasty. J Musculoskel Res 1999;3:253-8.
11. Nakama S, Nitanai K, Oohashi Y, et al. Cervical muscle strength after laminoplasty. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:36-40.
12. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa S, et al. Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. Spine 2005;30:2544-9.
13. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:29-33.
14. Shiraishi T. A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2002;96:122-6.
15. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. Prospective trial of C3-6 laminoplasty for manltisegment cord compression [in Japanese]. Rinsho Seikei Geka 2004;39:659-65.
16. Iizuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K, et al. Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine 2001;26:2220-6.
17. Japanese Orthopedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1994;68:490-503.
18. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983;8:693-9.
19. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, et al. Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 2005;30:2414-9.
20. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, et al. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003; 28:2667-72.
21. Conley MS, Meyer RA, Bloomberg JJ, et al. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine 1995;20:2505-12.
22. Vasavada AN, Li S, Delp SL. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine1998;23:412-22.
23. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa S, et al. Anatomic study of the semispinalis cervicis for reattachment during laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005:126-31.