Globalisation and local resistance: Alternative city developmental scenarios on capital's global frontier-the case of Yalova, Turkey

Progress in Planning

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 45-97

  Özkaynak, Begüm ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Driving forces; Governance; Scenarios; Turkey; Urban studies

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC INTEGRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; GLOBALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

EURASIA; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY; YALOVA;

EID: 50549092423     PISSN: 03059006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (155)

1. Alcamo, J. (2001). Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental issue report, 24. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
2. Alper E., and Saǧlam I. The transmission of a sudden capital outflow: Evidence from Turkey. Eastern European Economics 39 2 (2001) 29-48
3. Anastasi C. On the art of scenario development. In: Kasemir B., Jäger J., Jaeger C.C., and Gardner M.T. (Eds). Public participation in sustainability science: A handbook (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 201-212
4. Aydi{dotless}n, S., & Çarkoǧlu, A. (2005). EU conditionality and democratic rule of law in Turkey. Working paper. Stanford, CA: CDDRL Publications.
5. Beauregard R.A. Theorizing the global-local connection. In: Knox L., and Taylor P.J. (Eds). World cities in a world system (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 233-248
6. Behar, C. (1999). An overview of Turkey's population. TÜSİAD report, pp. 29-49.
7. Berkhout F., and Hertin J. Foresight future scenarios: Developing and applying a participative strategic planning tool (2002), SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, Brighton
8. Bertrand G., Michalski A., and Pench L. Scenarios Europe 2010: Five possible futures (1999), European Commission, Forward Studies Unit, Brussels
9. Bryant B. Environmental justice: Issues, policies and solutions (1995), Island Press, Washington, DC
10. Brugha R., and Varvasovsky Z. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning 15 3 (2000) 239-246
11. Bullard R. Dumping in Dixie: Race, class and environmental quality (1990), Westview, Boulder, CO
12. Bullard R. Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots (1993), South End Press, Boston, MA
13. Burayidi M.A. Urban planning in a multicultural society (2000), Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT
14. Cañellas S., Gonzales A.C., Puig I., Russi D., Sendra C., and Sojo A. Material flow accounting of Spain. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 10 10 (2004) 1-13
15. Cairns G., Wright G., Van der Heijden K., Bradfield R., and Burt G. Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: Issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 38 (2006) 1010-1025
16. Castells, M. (2000). Urban sociology in the twenty-first century. In I. Susser (Ed.) (2001), The Castells reader on cities and social theory (pp. 390-406). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Clayton A., Wehrmeyer W., and Ngubane B. Foresighting for development (2003), Earthscan, London
18. Cohen B. Urban growth in developing countries: A review of current trends and a caution regarding existing forecasts. World Development 32 1 (2004) 23-51
19. Commission of the European Communities (COM) (2006). 2006 regular report on Turkey's progress toward accession, 649 final. Brussels, 8 November.
20. Curwell S. Intelcity roadmap project initial report (2003), EU Information Technologies Programme, Brussels
21. Danielson M.N., and Keleş R. The politics of rapid urbanization: Government and growth in modern Turkey (1985), Holmes & Meier Publishers, London
22. Davoudi S. Planning and the twin discourses of sustainability for a sustainable future. In: Layard A., Davoudi S., and Batty S. (Eds). Planning for a sustainable future (2001), Spon Press, London 81-94
23. De Marchi B., Funtowicz S.O., Lo Cascio S., and Munda G. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation: An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics 34 (2000) 267-282
24. De Mooij R., and Tang P. Four futures of Europe (2003), Centraal Planbureau, Den Haag, the Netherlands
25. Derviş, K., Gros, D., Öztrak, F., Bayar, F., & Işik, F. (2004). Relative income growth and convergence. EU-Turkey Working Papers, 8. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
26. Derviş K., Emerson M., Gros D., and Ülgen S. The European transformation of modern Turkey (2004), Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels
27. Döll, P., & Petschel-Held, G. (2002). Scale issues in scenario development. Paper presented at Kassel scenario workshop.
28. Duara P. Culture, power, and the state: Rural North China, 1900-1942 (1988), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
29. Eder M. The challenge of globalization and Turkey's changing political economy. In: Rubin B., and Kirişçi K. (Eds). Turkey in world politics: An emerging multiregional power (2002), Boǧazuçi University Press, Istanbul 249-284
30. Eder M. Implementing economic criteria of EU membership: How difficult is it for Turkey?. In: Çarkoǧlu A., and Rubin B. (Eds). Turkey and the European Union: Domestic politics, economic integration and international dynamics (2003), Frank Cass, London 219-245
31. Elder G.H. Time, human agency and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly 57 11 (1994) 4-15
32. Ercan, H. (1999). The structure of Turkish labour markets: 1998-2025. In TÜSİAD report (pp. 104-129). Istanbul: TÜSİAD Publications.
33. Erder, S. (1999). Social consequences of a changing demographic structure: The past, the present and the future. In TÜSİAD report (pp. 87-102). Istanbul: TÜSİAD Publications.
34. Esteva G., and Prakash M.S. From global to local: Beyond neoliberalism to the international hope. In: Lechner F.J., and Boli J. (Eds). The globalisation reader (2004), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 410-416
35. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2004). Mapping the impacts of recent natural disasters and technological accidents. Environmental issue report, 35. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
36. European Commission (EC-DGXI) (1996). Vision 2020: Scenarios for a sustainable Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General XI, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, General Consultative Forum.
37. European Commission (EC-DGXVII) (1996). Energy in Europe: European energy to 2020-A scenario approach. Luxembourg: European Commission.
38. Eurostat. Material use in the European Union 1980-2000: Indicators and analysis (2002), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
39. Evans B., and Rydin Y. Planning, professionalism and sustainability. In: Blowers A., and Evans B. (Eds). Town planning into the 21st century (1997), Routledge, London 56-69
40. In: Faber D. (Ed). The struggle for ecological democracy: The environmental justice movement in the United States (1998), Guilford Press, New York
41. Falay N., Kalaycioǧlu E., and Özkirimli U. Budgetary practices and procedures in local administrations: A political and economic analysis (1996), TESEV Publications, Istanbul
42. Flyvbjerg B. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
43. Flyvbjerg B. Bringing power to planning research: One researcher's story. In: Thornley A., and Rydin Y. (Eds). Planning in a global era (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot 117-141
44. Flyvbjerg B. A perestroikan straw man answers back: David Laitin and phronetic political science. Politics & Society 32 3 (2004) 389-416
45. Funtowicz, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. (1999). Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. Environmental issues series, 9. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
46. Gallopin G., Hammond A., Raskin P., and Swart R. Branch points: Global scenarios and human choice (1997), Global Scenario Group, Boston, MA
47. Gallopin G.C., and Raskin P. Windows on the future: Global scenarios and sustainability. Environment 40 3 (1998) 6-11 26-31
48. Gallopin G.C., and Rijsberman F. Three global water scenarios. International Journal of Water 1 1 (2000) 16-40
49. Geddes P. Cities in evolution (1915), Williams & Norgate, London
50. Ghanadan R. Choices ahead: Three alternative development scenarios for California (2002), The Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development, Berkeley, CA
51. Gibbs L.M. Love canal: My story (1981), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
52. Gibbs D., and Healey M. Local government, environmental policy and economic development. In: Taylor M. (Ed). Environmental change: Industry, power and policy (1995), Avebury, Aldershot 151-167
53. Gibson C.C., Ostrom E., and Ahn T.K. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics 32 (2000) 217-239
54. Göymen K. The restructuring of local administration in Turkey. In: Göymen K., and Veit W. (Eds). Local administration: Democracy versus efficiency (1982), Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Bonn
55. Göymen K. Novel participatory mechanisms in Turkish municipal system. Local Governance 25 1 (1999) 9-23
56. Göymen, K. (2005). Metropolitan restructuring in Istanbul: Attempts to 'integrate' the city through local development. Paper presented at the International Administrative Sciences annual conference.
57. Göymen, K., & Özkaynak, B. (2008). Recent developments in local governance in Turkey: Experiences and lessons from Pendik, Sabanci{dotless}. Istanbul: University working paper series.
58. Greeuw, S. C. H., Van Asselt, M. B. A., Grosskurth, J., Storms, C. A. M. H., Rijkens-Klomp, N., Rothman, D., & Rotmans, J. (2000). Cloudy crystal balls. Environmental issues series, 17. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
59. Guha R., and Martinez-Alier J. Varieties of environmentalism: Essays north and south (1997), Earthscan, London
60. Haberl H., Fischer-Kowalski M., Krausmann F., Weisz H., and Winiwarter V. Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 12 3 (2004) 199-213
61. Hale W., and Avci G. Turkey and the European Union: The long road to membership. In: Rubin B., and Kirişçi K. (Eds). Turkey in world politics: An emerging multiregional power (2002), Boǧazuçi University Press, Istanbul 42-64
62. Hall P. Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century (2002), Blackwell, Cambridge
63. Hall P., and Pfeiffer U. Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty first century cities (2000), E. & F.N. Spon, New York
64. Hammond A. Which world? Scenarios for the 21st century (1998), Island Press, Washington, DC
65. In: Healey P., Cameron S., Davoudi S., Graham S., and Madani-Pour A. (Eds). Managing cities: The new urban context (1995), Wiley, London
66. Healthy Cities Network Report of Yalova. (2004). Current situation report and health plan. Yalova: Governorship of Yalova and Yalova Local Agenda 21.
67. Hernandez M., and Iyengar S.S. What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Social Cognition 19 3 (2001) 269-294
68. In: Hofrichter R. (Ed). Toxic struggles: The theory and practice of environmental justice (1993), New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA
69. Hoyer K.G., and Naess P. The ecological traces of growth: Economic growth, liberalization, increased consumption-and sustainable urban development?. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3 (2001) 177-192
70. Howard, E. (1898). Tomorrow (republished as Garden cities of tomorrow in 1902). London: Faber and Faber.
71. IPCC. Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
72. IPCC. Climate change 1992: The supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
73. IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Emission scenarios (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
74. Işik, O., & Güvenç, M. (1999). The changing nature of Turkish urbanization and economic geography on eve of the 21st century: New challenges and new opportunities. In TÜSİAD report (pp. 52-83). Istanbul: TÜSİAD Publications.
75. Ioakidimis P.C. The Europeanisation of Greece: An overall assessment. In: Featherstone K., and Kazamias G. (Eds). Europeanisation and the southern periphery (2001), Frank Cass, London 73-94
76. İzci R. The impact of the European Union on environmental policy. In: Adaman F., and Arsel M. (Eds). Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development (2005), Ashgate, Aldershot 87-100
77. Kaygusuz K., and Arsel M. Energy politics and policy. In: Adaman F., and Arsel M. (Eds). Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development (2005), Ashgate, Aldershot 149-166
78. Keyder C. Istanbul: Between the global and the local (1999), Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
79. Keyder C. Memalik-i Osmaniye'den Avrupa Birliǧi'ne (From the Ottoman Empire to the European Union) (2003), İletişim Publications, Istanbul
80. Keyder C. Transformations in urban structure and the environment in Istanbul. In: Adaman F., and Arsel M. (Eds). Environmentalism in Turkey: Between democracy and development (2005), Ashgate, Aldershot 201-215
81. Kirişçi K. US-Turkish relations: New uncertainties in a renewed partnership. In: Rubin B., and Kirişçi K. (Eds). Turkey in world politics: An emerging multiregional power (2002), Boǧazuçi University Press, Istanbul 122-150
82. Kok K., Rothman D., and Patel M. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective. Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 38 (2006) 261-284
83. Koçal Y. Verimlilik ve Gönüllülük Işi{dotless}ǧi{dotless}nda Yerel Kalki{dotless}nma (Local development in the light of efficiency and volunteerism) (1996), Gren Ajans, Istanbul
84. Koçal L.Y. Dünya Kenti Yalova için Postmodern Alternatif Yerel Siyaset (Postmodern alternative local politics for global city Yalova) (1997), Promat Basi{dotless}m Yayi{dotless}m, Istanbul
85. Koçal Y. Yerelden Ulusala Bilişim Eylem Plani{dotless} (Information technology action plan from a local to a national level) (2001), Diner Ofset, Istanbul
86. Köker, L. (1995). Local politics and democracy in Turkey: An appraisal. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science: Local Governance Around the World, 540, 51-62.
87. Kowarik I. Human agency in biological invasions: Secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions 5 3 (2003) 293-312
88. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions (1962), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
89. Küik, O. J., & Oosterhuis, F. H. (2001). Lessons from the southern enlargement of the EU for environmental dimensions of eastern enlargement, in particular for Poland. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro Series.
90. Larrabee F.S., and Lesser I.O. Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty (2003), RAND Publications, Arlington, VA
91. In: Layard A., Davoudi S., and Batty S. (Eds). Planning for a sustainable future (2001), Spon Press, London
92. Lechner F.J., and Boli J. The globalisation reader (2004), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
93. In: LeGates R.T., and Stout F. (Eds). The city reader (2003), Routledge, London/New York
94. Martinez-Alier J. Environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
95. Mercer C. Geographies for the present: Patrick Geddes, urban planning and the human sciences. Economy and Society 26 2 (1997) 211-232
96. Meristö T. Not forecasts but multiple scenarios when coping with uncertainties in the competitive environment. European Journal of Operational Research 38 (1989) 350-357
97. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Millennium ecosystem assessment series (2005), Island Press, Washington, DC
98. Michie J. The handbook of globalisation (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
99. Mollenkopf, J. (1992). How to study urban political power. In R. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.) (2003), The city reader (pp. 235-244). London/New York: Routledge.
100. Munda G. Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment (1995), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
101. Munda G. Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research 158 3 (2004) 662-677
102. Munda G. Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23 1 (2006) 86-94
103. Mumford L. The city in history: Its origins, its transformations and its prospects (1961), Harcourt, Brace and World, New York
104. Naess P. Urban planning and sustainable development. European Planning Studies 9 4 (2001) 503-524
105. New Charter of Athens. The European Council of Town Planners' vision for cities in the 21st century (2003), European Council of Town Planners, Lisbon
106. Norgaard R.D. Co-evolutionary development potential. Land Economics 60 (1984) 160-173
107. Noronha L., Lourenco N., Lobo-Ferreira J., and Lleopart A. Coastal tourism, environment and sustainable development (2002), TERI Publications, New Delhi
108. Öniş, Z. (2000a). The Turkish economy at the turn of the new century: Critical and comparative perspectives. In M. Abramowitz (Ed.) (2000), Turkey's transformation and American policy. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.
109. Öniş Z. Neoliberal globalization and the democracy paradox: Interpreting the Turkish general elections of 1999. Journal of International Affairs 54 2 (2000)
110. Öniş Z. Domestic politics, international norms and challenges to the state: Turkey-EU relations in the post-Helsinki era. In: Çarkoǧlu A., and Rubin B. (Eds). Turkey and the European Union (2003), Frank Cass, London 9-34
111. Öniş, Z., & Keyman, F. (2003). Helsinki, Copenhagen and beyond: Challenges to the new Europe and the Turkish state. Paper presented at the conference on Cyprus' European accession and the Greek-Turkish rivalry.
112. Öniş, Z., & Şenses, F. (2007). Global dynamics, domestic coalitions and a reactive state: Major policy shifts in post-war Turkish economic development. Ankara: METU Economic Research Center. Working paper 20636.
113. Öniş, Z., & Keyman, F. (submitted for publication). Globalization, social democracy in the European periphery: Paradoxes of the Turkish experience. Mimeo.
114. Özcan G.B. Local economic development, decentralisation and consensus building in Turkey. Progress in Planning 54 (2000) 199-278
115. Özcan G.B. A critical analysis of decentralisation and local economic development: The Turkish case, environment and planning C. Government and Policy 24 1 (2006)
116. Özkaynak B., and Adaman F. Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme: Yalova Örneǧinde Sürdürülebilir Kent Tasari{dotless}mi{dotless}na Yönelik Bir Yöntem Önerisi (Sustainable urbanisation: A method proposal on the design of sustainable city with reference to Yalova) (2004), TÜSES, Istanbul
117. Paehlke R.C. Democracy's dilemma: Environment, social equity and the global economy (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
118. Quaisser, W., & Wood, S. (2004). EU-member Turkey? Preconditions, consequences and integration alternatives. Forost Working Papers, 25. Munich: Forost.
119. Raskin P., Chadwick M., Jackson T., and Leach G. The sustainability transition: Beyond conventional development (1996), Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm
120. Raskin, P., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., & Swart, R. (1998). Bending the curve: Toward global sustainability. PoleStar report, 8. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
121. Raskin P., Banruti T., Gallopin G., Gutman P., Hammond A., Kates R., and Swart R. Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead (2002), Global Scenario Group, Boston, MA
122. Raskin P., Swart R.J., and Robinson J. Navigating the sustainability transition: The future of scenarios. In: Biermann F., Campe S., and Jacob K. (Eds). Knowledge for the sustainability transition. The challenge for social science (2004), Springer, Heidelberg
123. Ravetz J. Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 (2000) 31-64
124. Ravetz, J. (2000b). Urban development 2050. Visions draft scenario report. Manchester: UMIST.
125. Ravetz J. City region 2020: Integrated planning for a sustainable environment (2000), Earthscan Publications, London
126. Robinson J. Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures 35 8 (2003) 839-856
127. Rodrik D. Has globalisation gone too far? (1997), Institute for International Economic, Washington, DC
128. Roseland M. Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic and social objectives. Progress in Planning 54 (2000) 73-132
129. Rothman D.S., and Rijkens N. Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures 32 (2000) 809-831
130. Rothmans, J., Van Asselt, M., Anastasi, C., Rothman, D., Greeuw, S., & Van Bers, C. (2001). Integrated visions for a sustainable Europe. Maastricht: Final Report, ICIS.
131. In: Rubin B., and Kirişçi K. (Eds). Turkey in world politics: An emerging multiregional power (2002), Boǧaziçi University Press, Istanbul
132. SPO. Turkey and the world in 2010 and 2020 (1998), SPO Projections, Prime Ministry, Ankara
133. SPO. The likely effects of Turkey's membership upon EU (2004), Prime Ministry, Ankara
134. Schwartz P. The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain world (1991), Currency Doubleday, New York
135. Taylor D. The rise of the environmental justice paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist 43 4 (2000) 508-580
136. The Economist (2003). A revolution, of sorts: Taming the generals, and knocking at Europe's door. 31 June.
137. Thornley A. Urban planning under Thatcherism: The challenge of the market. 2nd ed. (1993), Routledge, London
138. Tippett J., Handley J.F., and Ravetz J. Meeting the challenges of sustainable development-Conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning. Progress in Planning 67 1 (2007) 9-98
139. Togan S. Turkey: Toward EU accession. The World Economy 27 7 (2004) 1013-1045
140. Tourism planning report of Turkey (2001). Turkey's tourism infrastructure and potential. Ankara: Ministry of Tourism.
141. TÜIK. Census of population: Social and economic characteristics of population (by province) (2000), TÜIK, Ankara
142. Tunali I. Background study on labour market and employment in Turkey (2003), European Training Foundation, Brussels
143. TÜSIAD. Turkey's window of opportunity (1999), TÜSİAD Publications, Istanbul
144. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS) (HABITAT). An urbanising world: Global report on human settlements (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
145. United Nations Development Programme (UNEP). Global environment outlook 3 (2002), Earthscan, London
146. UNDP. Human development report Turkey (2004), UNDP, New York
147. Van Asselt M.B.A., Storms C.A.M.H., Rijkens-Klomp N., and Rothmans J. Towards visions for a unstainable Europe: An overview and assessment of the last decade in European scenario studies (1998), ICIS, Maastricht
148. Van Asselt M.B.A., Rothmans J., Greeuw S.C.H., and Rothman D. The Visions methodology (2001), ICIS, Maastricht
149. Van der Heijden K. Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation (1996), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester/New York
150. Van Notten P.W.F., Rothmans J., Van Asselt M.B.A., and Rothman D.S. An updated scenario typology. Futures 35 (2003) 423-443
151. Wehrmeyer, W., Clayton, A., & Lum, K. (2003). Foresighting for development. Greener Management International (theme issue), 37.
152. Wiek A., Binder C., and Scholz R. Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures 38 (2006) 740-766
153. Wheeler, S. (1999). The institutions of metropolitan planning: A comparison between Portland, Oregon, and Toronto, Ontario. Unpublished PhD thesis. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Department of City and Regional Planning.
154. In: Wheeler S., and Beatley T. (Eds). The sustainable urban development reader (2004), Routledge, London/New York
155. Yeşil Atlas. Turkey's natural heritage: Zero extinction. 6 (2003), Dogan Burda Dergi, Istanbul