Perceived landscape impacts of mobile telecommunications development in the Peak District National Park, England

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 679-699

  Park, Jung Jin ^a   Jorgensen, Anna ^a   Swanwick, Carys ^a   Selman, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

National Park residents; Perceived health impacts; Protected areas; Public perception; Socio economic value; Symbolic attributes

Indexed keywords

HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH RISK; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NATIONAL PARK; PERCEPTION; PROTECTED AREA; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 50349100383     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560802218529     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adams, B. (2001) Joined-up conservation. Ecos, 22, pp. 22-27.
2. Antrop, M. (1997) The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders region. Landscape and urban planning, 38, pp. 105-117.
3. Antrop, M. (1998) Landscape change: Plan or chaos?. Landscape and urban planning, 41, pp. 155-161.
4. Antrop, M. (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and urban planning, 67, pp. 9-26.
5. Bachert, S. (1991) Acceptance of national parks and participation of local people in decision-making processes. Landscape and urban planning, 20, pp. 239-244.
6. Baker, C. (2005) Inexorable march of mobile phones pressures planners. Planning, pp. 15-16.
7. Baldassare, M. and Katz, C. (1992) The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practice. Environment and behavior, 24, pp. 602-616.
8. Blake, D. E. (2001) Contextual effects on environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and behavior, 33, pp. 708-725.
9. Bonaiuto, M. et al. (2002) Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. Journal of economic psychology, 23, pp. 631-653.
10. Bull, C. (1990) Popular support for nature conservation: The attitudes of county conservation trust members. Built environment, 16, pp. 203-217.
11. Bunce, M. (1994) The countryside ideal: Anglo-American images of landscape, Routledge, London
12. Carrus, G., Bonaiuto, M. and Bonnes, M. (2005) Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy. Environment and behavior, 37, pp. 237-257.
13. Coles, R. and Taylor, J. (1993) Wind power and planning: The environmental impact of wind farms in the UK. Land use policy, 10, pp. 205-226.
14. Commission for Rural Communities (2006) The state of the countryside 2006: Living in the countryside [online]
15. Countryside Agency (2002) Information communication technology (ICT) and rural inclusion [online]
16. de Groot, W. T. and van den Born, R.J.G. (2003) Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and urban planning, 63, pp. 127-138.
17. DEFRA (2005) ICT in England's rural economies: A final report to DEFRA [online], DEFRA
18. Dunlap, R. E. et al. (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56, pp. 425-442.
19. Fairlie, S. (1996) Low impact development: Planning and people in a sustainable countryside, Jon Carpenter, Charlbury, UK
20. Fransson, N. and Garling, T. (1999) Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of environmental psychology, 19, pp. 369-382.
21. Grimes, S. (2000) Rural areas in the information society: Diminishing distance or increasing learning capacity?. Journal of rural studies, 16, pp. 13-21.
22. Habron, D. (1998) Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landscape and urban planning, 42, pp. 45-56.
23. Herzog, T. R. and Chernick, K. K. (2000) Tranquillity and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of environmental psychology, 20, pp. 29-39.
24. Hiedanpaa, H. (2000) European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland. Landscape and urban planning, 61, pp. 113-123.
25. Holdaway, E. and Smart, G. (2001) Landscape at risk?: The future for areas of outstanding natural beauty, Spon Press, London
26. Jones, M. and Daugstad, K. (1997) Usages of the 'cultural landscape' concept in Norwegian and Nordic landscape administration. Landscape research, 22, pp. 267-281.
27. Kaplan, R. (1985) The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape planning, 12, pp. 161-176.
28. Kellett, J. (1990) The environmental impact of wind energy developments. Town planning review, 61, pp. 139-155.
29. Kopomaa, T. (2002) Mobile phones, place-centred communication and neo-community. Planning theory and practice, 3, pp. 241-245.
30. Krohn, S. and Damborg, S. (1999) On public attitudes towards wind power. Renewable energy, 16, pp. 954-960.
31. Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (2002) Guidelines for landscape and visual assessment, Spon Press, London
32. Laurie, I. C. (1980) Visual aspects of landscape evaluation. The aesthetics of landscape: Rural planning services, The Landscape Research Group, Oxfordshire, UK
33. Law, A. and McNeish, W. (2007) Contesting the new irrational actor model: A case study of mobile phone mast protest. Sociology, 41, pp. 439-456.
34. Lutz, A. R., Simpson-Housley, P. and De Man, A. F. (1999) Wilderness: rural and urban attitudes and perceptions. Environment and behavior, 31, pp. 259-266.
35. Mace, B. L., Bell, P. A. and Loomis, R. J. (2004) Visibility and natural quiet in national parks and wilderness areas. Environment and behavior, 36, pp. 5-31.
36. Malecki, E. J. (2003) Digital development in rural areas: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of rural studies, 19, pp. 201-214.
37. Marshall, R. and Baxter, R. (2002) Strategic routeing and environmental impact assessment for overhead electrical transmission lines. Journal of environmental planning and management, 45, pp. 747-764.
38. Mayer, F. S. and Frantz, C. M. (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 24, pp. 503-515.
39. McFarlane, B. L. and Boxall, P. C. (2003) The role of social psychological and social structure variables in environmental activism: an example of the forest sector. Journal of environmental psychology, 23, pp. 79-87.
40. Mitchell, S. and Clark, D. (1999) Business adoption of information and communications technologies in the two-tier rural economy: Some evidence from the South Midlands. Journal of rural studies, 15, pp. 447-455.
41. Mobile Operators Association (2007) Base stations and masts [online]
42. Monk, A. et al. (2004) Why are mobile phones annoying?. Behaviour & information technology, 23, pp. 33-41.
43. MORI (2003) The British mobile communications survey [online]
44. Muir, R. (1998) Reading the landscape, rejecting the present. Landscape research, 23, pp. 71-82.
45. Nohl, W. (2001) Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception: preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and urban planning, 54, pp. 223-237.
46. O'Neill, J. and Walsh, M. (2000) Landscape conflicts: Preferences, identities and rights. Landscape ecology, 15, pp. 281-289.
47. ODPM (2002) Code of best practice on mobile phone network development [online]
48. Office of Communications (2006) The communications market: Interim report, February 2006 [online]
49. Orland, B. (1988) Aesthetic preference for rural landscape: Some resident and visitor differences. Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications, University Press, Cambridge
50. Parker, E. B. (2000) Closing the digital divide in rural America. Telecommunications policy, 24, pp. 281-290.
51. Peak District National Park Authority (2001) Peak District National Park local plan, Peak District National Park Authority, Bakewell, Derbyshire
52. Piper, J. (2001) Assessing the cumulative effects of project clusters: A comparison of process and methods in four UK cases. Journal of environmental planning and management, 44, pp. 357-375.
53. Pollock-Ellwand, N. (2001) Landscape policy and planning practice: The gap in understanding, Ontario, Canada. Landscape research, 26, pp. 99-118.
54. Powell, L., Selman, P. and Wragg, A. (2002) Protected areas: Reinforcing the virtuous circle. Planning practice & research, 17, pp. 279-295.
55. Ramirez, R. (2001) A model for rural and remote information and communication technologies: A Canadian exploration. Telecommunications policy, 25, pp. 315-330.
56. Rantala, T. and Primmer, E. (2003) Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environmental science & policy, 6, pp. 205-216.
57. Regan, C. L. and Horn, S. A. (2005) To nature or not to nature: associations between environmental preferences, mood states and demographic factors. Journal of environmental psychology, 25, pp. 57-66.
58. Rogan, R., O'Connor, M. and Horwitz, P. (2005) Nowhere to hide: awareness and perceptions of environmental change, and their influence on relationship with place. Journal of environmental psychology, 25, pp. 147-158.
59. Ryan, R. L. (2002) Preserving rural character in New England: Local residents' perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and urban planning, 61, pp. 19-35.
60. Sagoff, M. (1992) Technological risk: A budget of distinctions. The environment in question, Routledge, London
61. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. and Harris, R. (1988) User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Journal of leisure research, 20, pp. 245-256.
62. Shepard, P. (2002) Man in the landscape: A historic view of the esthetics of nature, The University of Georgia Press, London
63. Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001) Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of environmental psychology, 21, pp. 369-385.
64. Thayer, R. L. and Freeman, C. M. (1987) Altamont-public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape and urban planning, 14, pp. 379-398.
65. UNEP/WCMC (1994) Guidelines for protected area management categories [online]
66. Uzzell, D. L. (2000) The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of environmental psychology, 20, pp. 307-318.
67. van den Berg, A.E. (1999) Individual differences in the aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes, University of Groningen, Groningen
68. van den Berg, A.E., Vlek, C. A. and Coeterier, F. (1998) Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach. Journal of environmental psychology, 18, pp. 141-157.
69. van Eetvelde, V. and Antrop, M. (2004) Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes-two examples from Southern France. Landscape and urban planning, 67, pp. 79-95.
70. Vroom, M. J. (1986) The perception of dimensions of space and levels of infrastructure and its application in landscape planning. Landscape planning, 12, pp. 337-352.
71. Warren, C. R. et al. (2005) 'Green on green': Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of environmental planning and management, 48, pp. 853-875.
72. Wohlwill, J. F. (1978) What belongs where: Research on the fittingness of man-made structures in natural settings. Landscape research, 3, pp. 3-5.
73. Zube, E. H. (1986) Local and extra-local perceptions of national parks and protected areas. Landscape and urban planning, 13, pp. 11-17.