Assessing the cumulative effects of project clusters: A comparison of process and methods in four UK cases

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 357-375

  Piper, Jake M ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PLANNING METHOD; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; RURAL PLANNING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034999713     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560120046115     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Associated British Ports, BP Chemicals Ltd, Environment Agency & Yorkshire Water Services Ltd (1997) Cumulative Impacts Study, Vols 1 and 2 (Leeds, Yorkshire Water Services Ltd).
2. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council/US National Research Council (1986) Proceedings of the Workshop Cumulative Environmental Effects: A Binational Perspective, Held Toronto 1985 (Hull, Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council).
3. Canter, L. (1999) Cumulative effects assessment, in: J. Petts (Ed) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 1 (Oxford, Blackwell Science).
4. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1985) Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, Official Journal, L175, 5 July.
5. CEC (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, Official Journal, L 206, 22 July, p. 7.
6. CEC (1997) Council Directive 97/11/EC of March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of certain public and private projects on the environment, Official Journal, L 73/5, 14 March, p. 5.
7. Conlan, K. & Rudd, T. (1998) Salt End (Humber) cumulative impact study, in: Proceedings of CIWEM Autumn Meeting: Sustainable Development: What Does it Really Mean for Rivers and Coasts?, Leamington Spa, 11th November, 1998 (London, Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management).
8. Cooper, T.A. & Canter, L.W. (1997) Substantive issues in cumulative impact assessment: a state-of-practice survey, Impact Assessment, 15, pp. 15-31.
9. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (1997) Considering Cumulative Effects (Executive Office of the President, USA) (http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/nepanet.htm).
10. Countryside Commission (1993) Landscape Assessment Guidance (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
11. Department of the Environment (1989) Air Quality Standards Regulations 1989, SI 317 (London, HMSO).
12. Environment Agency (1999) Planning for the Rising Tides - Options Consultation Document (Bristol, Environment Agency).
13. East Riding of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) (1999a) Landscape and visual impacts of proposed wind energy developments in South Holderness, Supplementary Report Prepared for ERYC (Internal Report).
14. Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) (2000) A Guide to Assessing the Cumulative Effects of Wind Energy Development (Prepared by contractor: Landscape Design Associates) (Harwell, ETSU for the Department of Trade and Industry).
15. ERYC (1999b) South Holderness wind energy development guidance, Prepared for ERYC (Internal Report).
16. Fuller, K. & Sadler, B. (1999) EC guidance on cumulative effects assessment, EA, pp. 33-35.
17. Hegmann, G., Cocklin, C., Creasey, R., Dupuis, S., Kennedy, A., Kingsley, L., Ross, W., Spaling, H. & Stalker, D. (1999) Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (Hull, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency) (http://www.ceaa.gc.ca/publications).
18. Hyder Consulting (1999) Guidelines for the Assessment of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts as Well as Impact Interactions (Brussels, European Commission DGXI, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection) (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg11/eia/eiasupport.htm).
19. Miller, D.R. & Morrice, J.G. (1998) Computer analysis of cumulative visual impacts of windfarms in Kintyre, Report for Scottish Natural Heritage.
20. Piper, J.M. (2000) Cumulative effects assessment on the Middle Humber; barriers overcome, benefits derived, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(3), pp. 369-387.
21. Ross, W.A. (1998) Cumulative effects assessment: learning from Canadian case studies, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(4), pp. 267-276.
22. Rumrill, J.N. & Canter, L.W. (1997) Addressing future actions in cumulative effects assessment, Project Appraisal, 12(4), pp. 207-218.
23. Street, E. (1997) EIA and pollution control, in: J. Weston (Ed) Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice (Harlow, Longman).
24. Street, E. & Ireland, M. (1997) Local air quality management in Kent: a partnership approach, Greener Management International, 20, pp. 75-87.
25. Weston, J. (2000) Screening, scoping and ES review under the 1999 EIA regulations, School of Planning Working Paper No. 184 (Oxford, Oxford Brookes University).