Perceptions of technological literacy among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics leaders

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 35-52

  Rose, Mary Annette ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50149120513     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v19i1.a.3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Sciences). (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics and technology. Washington DC: Author.
2. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Sciences). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 715-729.
5. Daugherty, M. K. (2005). A changing role for technology teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(1), 41-53.
6. Government Accounting Office, U.S. (2005). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs and related trends (No. GAO-06-114).
7. Hale, J. A. (1972). Essential determinants of technological literacy for high school graduates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
8. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). (1998). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene, OR: Author.
9. ITEA (International Technology Education Association, Technology for All Americans Project). (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
10. ITEA (International Technology Education Association, Technology for All Americans Project). (1996). Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
11. Krupczak, Jr., J., & Ollis, D. F. (2005, April). Improving the technological literacy of undergraduates: Identifying the research issues. Workshop sponsored by The National Science Foundation. National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC.
12. Lewis, T., & Gagel, C. (1992). Technological literacy: A critical analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 117-138.
13. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2001). Science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2001/standards/strand4.html
14. NAE & NRC (National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council). (2006). Tech Tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15. NAE & NRC (National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
17. NRC (National Research Council). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Rose, L.C., Gallup, A.M., Dugger, W.E., & Starkweather, K.N. (2004). The second installment of the ITEA/Gallup poll and what it reveals as to how Americans think about technology: A report of the second survey conducted by the Gallup organization for the International Technology Education Association. The Technology Teacher, 64(1), (Insert).
19. Zuga, K. F. (1989). Relating technology education goals to curriculum planning. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), 34-58.