Interactive and cultural differences in online newspapers

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 505-509

  Hong, Moonki ^a   McClung, Steven ^a   Park, Youngrak ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; MASS COMMUNICATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; SOUTH KOREA; UNITED STATES;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; HUMANS; INTERNET; JOURNALISM; NEWSPAPERS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 50149094534     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0108     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rafaeli S. (1988) Interactivity: from new media to communication. In Hawkins RP, Wiemann JM, Pingree S, eds. Advancing communication science: merging mass and interpersonal processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 110-34.
2. Heeter C. (1989) Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In Salvaggio JL, Bryant J, eds. Media use in the information age: emerging patterns of adoption and computer use. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 217-35.
3. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 1992; 42:73-93.
4. Rafaeli S, Sudweeks F. Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1997; 2:53.
5. Kiousis S. (1999) Broadening the boundaries of interactivity: a concept explication. Paper presented at the 1999 Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Media Communication (AEJMC), New Orleans, LA, Aug. 4-7.
6. Rice RE. (1984) Development of new media research. In Rice R & Associates, eds. The new media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 33-80.
7. Ha L, James L. Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1998; 42:457-74.
8. Cho CH, Leckenby JD. (1999) Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: antecedents and consequences of interactivity in Web advertising. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Albuquerque, NM, March.
9. Kiousis S. Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society 2002; 4:355-83.
10. Cho CH, Cheon HS. Korean vs. American corporate Websites: interactivity, comparative appeals and use of technology. Journal of Korean Academy of Marketing Science 2003; 5:79-102.
11. Hall ET. (1976) Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
12. Cho CH, Cheon HS. Cross-cultural comparisons of interactivity on corporate Websites. Journal of Advertising 2004; 34:99-115.
13. Hofstede G. (2001) Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Hall ET. (1980) The silent language. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15. McMillan S. Health communication and the Internet: relations between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content, and purpose. Health Communication 1999; 11:375-90.
16. Kenny D, Marshall JE. Contextual marketing. Harvard Business Review 2000; 78:119-25.
17. McMillan S. (2002) Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: users, documents, and systems. In Lievrouw LA, Livingstone SM, eds. Handbook of new media: social shaping and consequence of ICTs. London: Sage, pp. 163-82.
18. Schultz T. Interactive options in online journalism: a content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1999; 5:477-89.
19. Kiess HO. (2001) Statistical concepts for the behavioral sciences, 3rd. ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Habermas J. (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.