Assessment of psychiatrists in practice through multisource feedback

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 525-533

  Violato, Claudio ^a   Lockyer, Jocelyn M ^a   Fidler, Herta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

360 degree evaluation; Communication skills; Multisource feedback; Physician assessment; Professional development; Professionalism; Psychiatrist

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONALISM; PSYCHIATRIST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SELF CARE; SELF EVALUATION; VALIDITY;

EID: 50049130450     PISSN: 07067437     EISSN: 14970015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/070674370805300807     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Frank J, editor. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competence framework [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005 [cited 2007 Jun 18]. Available from: http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/ CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_e.pdf.
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome Project [Internet]. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Chicago (IL): 2006 [cited 2007 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/.
3. General Medical Council. Good medical practice 2006 [Internet]. London (GB): General Medical Council; 2006 [cited 2007 Jun 18] Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/GMC_GMP.pdf.
4. Swick S, Hall S, Beresin E. Assessing the ACGME competencies in psychiatry training programs. Acad Psychiatry. 2006;30:330-351.
5. Bandiera G, Sherbino J, Frank J, editors. The CanMEDS assessment tools handbook: an introductory guide for assessment methods for the CanMEDS competencies. Ottawa (ON): Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2006.
6. Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, et al. Mini-PAT (peer assessment tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;Oct 12. DOI: 10.1007/s10459- 006-9033-3.
7. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review. CMAJ. 1999;61:52-57.
8. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, et al. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med. 2002;77(S):64 -66.
9. Lockyer JM, Violato C, Fidler H. A multisource feedback program for anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth. 2006;53(1):33-39.
10. Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H. Multi source feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ. 2003;326:546-548.
11. Fidler H, Lockyer J, Toews J, et al. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med. 1999;74:702-714.
12. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Physician Achievement Review Program [Internet]. Edmonton (AB): College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta; 2005 [cited 2007 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.par-program.org/ PAR-Inst.htm.
13. Lockyer J, Violato C. An examination of the appropriateness of using a common peer assessment instrument to assess physician skills across specialties. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S5-S8.
14. Violato C, Lockyer J. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Advances in Health Science Education. 2006;11(3):235-244.
15. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993;269(13):1655-1660.