Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm carpentier-edwards perimoun bioprosthesis and 19-mm medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis

Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 81-87

  Tanigawa, Kazuyosh ^a   Eishi, Kiyoyuki ^a   Yamachika, Shiro ^a   Hashizume, Koji ^a   Tada, Seiichi ^a   Yamane, Kentaro ^a   Izumi, Kenta ^a   Takai, Hideaki ^a   Miura, Takashi ^a   Nakaji, Shun ^a  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthetic valves; Small aortic annulus

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 50049102142     PISSN: 13411098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, Kass RM, Sandhu M, et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 257-69.
2. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-pa-tient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20-4.
3. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Métras J, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 211-8.
4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-41.
5. Guidelines from the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and the Canadian Hypertension Society on theechocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass. Task Force of the Echocardiography Section. Can J Cardiol 1995; 11: 391-5.
6. Castro LJ, Arcidi JM Jr, Fisher AL, Gaudiani VA. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 31-6.
7. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 2180-5.
8. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax 1970; 25: 339-46.
9. Konno S, Imai Y, Iida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 70: 909-17.
10. Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78: 402-12.
11. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1608-12.
12. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, et al. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 146-54.
13. Banbury MK, Cosgrove DM 3rd, Thomas JD, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, et al. Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1460-5.
14. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Gunzinger R, Kemkes BM, Sosnowski A, et al. European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 333-9.
15. Kirsch ME, Tzvetkov B, Vermes E, Pouzet B, Sauvat S, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14: 433-9.
16. Takakura H, Sasaki T, Hashimoto K, Hachiya T, Onoguchi K, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of 19- mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 609-13.
17. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Keithahn A, et al. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 382-8.
18. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1056-63.
19. Marquez S, Hon RT, Yoganathan AP. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10: 802-11.
20. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 1036-44.
21. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, DallaTomba M, Mhagna Z, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 505-10.
22. Flameng W, Meuris B, Herijgers P, Herregods MC. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 530-6.
23. Takai H, Yamachika S, Hazama S, Ariyoshi T, Odate T, et al. Consideration of prosthesis-patient mismatch and left ventricular mass regression after implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in elderly Japanese patients: body surface area may be irrelevant. J Artif Organs 2004; 7: 203-6.
24. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, Lehmann S, Garbade J, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and longterm outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 15-9.
25. Howell NJ, Keogh BE, Barnet V, Bonser RS, Graham TR, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 10-4.
26. Hashimoto K. Patient-prosthesis mismatch: the Japanese experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 12: 159-65.