The Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001-2006: A bibliometric study

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 103-116

  Bakri, Aryati ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science; Publications analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 49949092373     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arunachalam, S. 2003. Information for research in developing countries: information technology - friend or foe? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 29, no. 4: 16-21.
2. Baird, L.M. and Oppenheim, C. 1994. Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, Vol. 20, no. 1: 1-15.
3. Bauer, K. and Bakkalbasi, N. 2005. An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11, no. 9. Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/ 09bauer.html
4. Chan, L., Kirsop, N., Costa, S. and Arunachalam, S. 2005. Improving access to research literature in developing countries: challenges and opportunities provided by Open Access. Available at http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/papers/150e-Chan.pdf
5. Cronin, B. 1984. The Citation Process. London: Taylor Graham.
6. Edzan, N.N. 2005. Tracing its origins: The history of the Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. The Serials librarian, Vol. 49, no. 1-2: 253-261.
7. Garfield, E. 1979. Citation Indexing: its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley.
8. Guan, J. and Ma, N. 2004. A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, Vol. 61, no. 3: 339-359.
9. Hyland, K. 2003. Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54, no. 3: 251-259.
10. Jacsó, P. 2005a. As we may search - comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, Vol. 89, part 9: 1537-1547.
11. Jacsó, P. 2005b. Google Scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Information Review, Vol. 29, no. 2: 208-214.
12. Kademani, B.S. and Kalyane, V.L. 1996. Outstandingly cited and most significant publications of R. Chidambaram, a nuclear physicist. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 1, no. 1: 21-36.
13. McVeigh, M.E. 2002. Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports. Available at http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/ journalcitationreports/selfcitation2002/
14. Meho, L.I and Yang, K. 2007. A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, no. 13: 2105-2125.
15. Nicolaisen, J. 2007. Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Vol. 41: 609-641.
16. Pasterkamp, G., Rotmans, J., Kleijn, D. and Borst, C. 2007. Citation frequency: A biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research articles. Scientometrics, Vol. 70, no. 1: 153-165.
17. Penas, C.S. and Willett, P. 2006. Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 32, no. 5: 480-485.
18. Pless, I.B. 2005. Do scientific publications change anything? British Medical Journal, Vol. 11, no. 4: 193.
19. Pritchard, A. 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, Vol. 25, no. 4: 348-349
20. Tiew, W. S. 2000. Characteristics of self-citations in Journal of Natural Rubber Research 1988-1997: a ten-year bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 5, no. 1: 95-104.
21. Tiew, W. S., Abdullah, A. and Kaur, K. 2002. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 1996-2000: a bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 6, no. 2: 43-56.
22. Tiew, W. S. and Kaur, K. 2000. Citation analysis of Journal of Natural Rubber Research, 1988-1997. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 5, no. 2: 45-56.
23. UTM 2004. Projek keberkesanan koleksi: analisis citation tesis pasca ijazah (Malay), Study the effective correlation: citation analysis of post-graduate thesis (in English). Skudai, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
24. UTM 2007. Kajian 'citation' penulisan staf akademik UTM (Malay), Study of citation: academic staff UTM (in English). Skudai, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
25. Vine, R. 2006. Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association. Vol. 94, no. 1: 97.
26. Zainab, A.N. and Fariza, H.N. 2000. The research communication process - the thesis to journal articles. Bengkel Penulisan limiah 'Dari tesis ke buku' (Malay), Academic Publication Training 'From thesis to book' (in English) Universiti Utara Malaysia