Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on students' reading comprehension and time on task

School Psychology Review

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 159-166

  Treptow, Megan A ^a   Burns, Matthew K ^a,b   McComas, Jennifer J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b 346 Elliott Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147156617     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 1-22.
2. Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. New York: American Book.
3. Bramlett, R. K., Murphy, J. J., Johnson, J., Wallingsford, L., & Hall, J. D. (2002). Contemporary practices in school psychology: A national survey of roles and referral problems. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 327-335.
4. Burns, M. K. (2004). Using curriculum-based assessment in the consultative process: A review of three levels of research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 15, 63-78.
5. Burns, M. K. (in press). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly.
6. Gickling, E. E., & Armstrong, D. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 559-566.
7. Gickling, E. E., & Havertape, S. (1981). Curriculumbased assessment (CBA). Minneapolis, MN: School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
8. Gickling, E. E., Shane, R. L., & Croskery, K. M. (1989). Developing math skills in low-achieving high school students through curriculum-based assessment, School Psychology Review, 18, 344-356.
9. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.).
10. Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
11. Kratochwill, T. R. (1992). Single-case research design and analysis: An overview, In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis; New directions for psychology and education (pp. 1-13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Maughan, B., Pickles, A., Hagell, A., Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1996). Reading problems and antisocial behavior: Developmental trends in comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 405-418.
13. McComas, J., Hoch, H., Paone, D., & El-Roy, D. (2000). Escape behavior during academic tasks: A preliminary analysis of idiosyncratic establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 479-493.
14. McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham. K., Watson. T. S., & Hindman. P. G. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23-32.
15. Read Naturally. (2003). Read Naturally master's edition teacher's manual. St. Paul, MN: Author.
16. Shapiro, E. S. (1992). Use of Gickling's model of curriculum-based assessment to improve reading in elementary age students. School Psychology Review, 21, 168-176.
17. Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Shapiro, E. S., Angello, L. M., & Eckert, T. L. (2004). Has curriculum-based assessment become a staple of school psychology practice? An update and extension of knowledge, use, and attitudes from 1990 to 2000. School Psychology Review, 33, 249-257.