Relational ethics and genetic counseling

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 459-471

  Evans, Marilyn ^a,b   Bergum, Vangie ^b   Bamforth, Stephen ^b   MacPhail, Sandra ^b  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Counseling; Ethics; Genetics; Relational; Therapeutic relationship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LITERATURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; ANECDOTES; CANADA; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 4944242819     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733004ne724oa     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Carper BA. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1978; 1(1): 13-23.
2. Bergum V, Dossetor J. Relational ethics: the full meaning of respect. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing, 2004 (in press).
3. van Zuuren F, van Schie E, van Baaren N. Uncertainty in the information provided during genetic counseling. J Patient Educ Counsel 1997; 32: 129-39.
4. Terrell-White M. Decision-making through dialogue: reconfiguring autonomy in genetic counseling. Theor Med Bioethics 1998; 19: 5-19.
5. van Zuuren F. The standard of neutrality during genetic counseling: an empirical investigation. J Patient Educ Counsel 1997; 32: 69-79.
6. Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade-Walsh M et al. Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genet 1998; 35: 731-38.
7. Rona RJ, Beech R, Mandalia S et al. The influence of genetic counseling in the era of DNA testing on knowledge, reproductive intentions and psychological well being. Clin Genet 1994; 46: 198-204.
8. Bishop A, Scudder J. Nursing ethics: therapeutic caring presence. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett, 1996.
9. Michie S, McDonald V, Marteau TM. Genetic counseling: information given, recall and satisfaction. Patient Educ Counsel 1997; 32: 101-106.
10. Gadow S. Relational narrative: the postmodern turn in nursing ethics. Sch Inquiry Nurs Pract 1999; 13: 57-70.
11. Gadow S. Relational ethics: mutual construction of practical knowledge between nurse and client. Proceedings of philosophy in the nurse's world: practical knowledge for nursing; 1995 May 15; Banff, AB, Canada.
12. van Hooft S. Kuhse on caring. Nurs Inquiry 1999; 6: 112-22.
13. Gadow S. Basis for nursing ethics: paternalism, consumerism, or advocacy? Hosp Prog 1983; 64(10): 62-7, 78.
14. Brock S. Narrative and medical genetics: on ethics and therapeutics. Qualitat Health Res 1995; 5: 150-68.
15. Wolff G, Jung C. Nondirectiveness and genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 1995; 4: 3-25.
16. Bowles-Biesecker B. Future directions in genetic counseling: practical and ethical considerations. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998; 8: 145-60.
17. Bernhardt B. Empirical evidence that genetic counseling is directive: where do we go from here? Am J Med Genet 1997; 60: 17-20.
18. Murray TH. The worth of a child. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996.
19. Burke M, Kolker A. Directiveness in prenatal genetic counseling. Women Health 1994; 22(2): 31-53.
20. Suter S. Value neutrality and nondirectiveness: comments on future directions in genetic counseling. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1999; 8: 161-63.
21. Brunger F, Lippman A. Resistance and adherence to the norms of genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 1995; 4: 151-67.
22. Anderson G. Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: patients read between the lines. Nurs Ethics 1999; 6: 126-36.
23. d'Agincourt-Canning L. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer: support for a relational view of autonomy. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Canadian Bioethics Society Conference; 1999 Oct 28-31; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
24. Sherwin S. A relational approach to autonomy in health care. In: Sherwin S ed. The politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1998: 19-47.
25. Boykin A. Nursing as caring through the reflective lens. In: Johns C, Freshwater D eds. Transforming nursing through reflective practice. London: Blackwell Science, 1998: 43-50.
26. Bergum V. Knowledge for ethical care. Nurs Ethics 1994; 1: 71-79.
27. Niebuhr HR. The responsible self. San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco, 1963.
28. Chadwick RF. What counts as success in genetic counselling? J Med Ethics 1993; 19: 43-46.
29. Brunger F, Lippmann A. Resistance and adherence to the norms of genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 1995; 4: 151-67.
30. Terrell-White M. Making responsible decisions: an interpretive ethic for genetic decision making. Hastings Cent Rep 1999; 29(1): 14-21.
31. Pierson W. Considering the nature of intersubjectivity within professional nursing. J Adv Nurs 1999; 30: 294-302.
32. Aranda S, Street A. Being authentic and being a chameleon: nurse-patient interaction revisited. Nurs Inquiry 1999; 6(2): 75-82.
33. Bandman E, Bandman B. Nursing ethics through the life span. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1995.
34. Lebacqz K. Humility in health care. J Med Philos 1992; 17: 291-307.
35. Keiser R. Roots of relational ethics: responsibility in origin and maturity. Atlanta, GA: Scholar's Press, 1996.
36. Jeffko W. Contemporary ethical issues: a personalistic perspective. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1998.
37. Downie R, Jodalen H. I-Thou and doctor-patient relationship examined. In: Jodalen H, Vetlesen A eds. Closeness: an ethics. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1977: 129-41.
38. Fredriksson L. Modes of relating in a caring conversation: a research synthesis on presence, touch and listening. J Adv Nurs 1999; 30: 1167-76.