Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 112-120

  Marzouki, Yousri ^a   Grainger, Jonathan ^a,b   Theeuwes, Jan ^c  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

IOR; Masked repetition priming; Subliminal priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION;

EID: 49349107089     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Besner D., Risko E.F., and Sklair N. Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2005) 99-108
2. Ducrot S., and Grainger J. Deployment of spatial attention to words in central and peripheral vision. Perception & Psychophysics 69 (2007) 578-590
3. Eriksen C.W., and Hoffman J.E. Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics 12 (1972) 201-204
4. Eriksen C.W., and Yeh Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 11 (1985) 583-597
5. Finkbeiner M., and Forster K.I. Attention, intention and domain-specific processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2008) 59-64
6. Forster K.I., and Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 10 (1984) 680-698
7. Forster K.I., and Forster J. DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioural Research Methods: Instruments and Computers 35 (2003) 1257-1270
8. Gawryszewski L.G., Riggio L., Rizzolatti G., and Umilta C. Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of neutral cues. Neuropsychologica 25 (1987) 19-29
9. Gibson B.S., and Amelio J. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 496-504
10. Handy T.C., Jha A.P., and Mangun G.R. Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 157-161
11. Jacobs A.M., and Grainger J. Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 43-52
12. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: Long J.B., and Baddeley A.D. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. 9 (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 187-203
13. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 33 (1970) 193-201
14. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-146
15. LaBerge D. Automatic information processing: a review. In: Long J.B., and Baddeley A.D. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. IX (1981), Elbraum, Hillsdale, NJ 173-186
16. Lachter J., Forster K.I., and Ruthruff E. Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 880-913
17. Marzouki Y., Grainger J., and Theeuwes J. Exogenous spatial cueing modulates subliminal priming. Acta Psychologica 126 (2007) 34-45
18. McCann R.S., Folk C.L., and Johnston J.C. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 18 (1992) 1015-1019
19. Mondor T.A., and Bryden M.P. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A (1992) 529-555
20. Mulckhuyse M., Talsma D., and Theeuwes J. Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition 15 (2007) 779-788
21. Nicholls M.E.R., and Wood A.G. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition. Brain and Cognition 38 (1998) 339-357
22. Ortells J.J., Tudela P., Noguera C., and Abad M.J.-F. Attentional orienting within visual field in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24 (1998) 1675-1689
23. Peressotti F., and Grainger J. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 691-706
24. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 3-25
25. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. 10 (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 531-556
26. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choates L.S., and Vaughn J. Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2 (1985) 211-228
27. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R., and Davidson B.J. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 160-174
28. Pratt J., Kingstone A., and Khoe W. Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 59 (1997) 964-971
29. Robertson L.C. Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: orientation priming and visual field differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 21 (1995) 707-718
30. Seguì J., and Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 16 (1990) 65-76
31. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 174-176
32. Spalek T.M., and Hammed S. Supporting the attentional momentum view of inhibition of return: Is attention biased to go right?. Perception & Psychophysics 66 (2004) 219-233
33. Spalek T.M., and Hammed S. The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 15-18
34. Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
35. Theeuwes J. Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 83-90
36. Yantis S., and Egeth H.E. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25 (1999) 661-676
37. Yantis S., and Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 16 (1990) 121-134
38. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., and McClish D.K. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine (2002), Wiley, New York