MHC and preferences for male odour in the bank vole

Ethology

Volumn 114, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 827-833

  Radwan, Jacek ^a   Tkacz, Aleksandra ^a   Kloch, Agnieszka ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; POLYMORPHISM; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE STATUS; RODENT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

CLETHRIONOMYS; CLETHRIONOMYS GLAREOLUS; MURIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 49349095814     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01528.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aeschlimann, P. B., Haberli, M. A., Reusch, T. B. H., Boehm, T. Milinski, M. 2003 : Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 119 126.
2. Andersson, M. B. 1994 : Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Apanius, V., Penn, D., Slev, P. R., Ruff, L. R. Potts, W. K. 1997 : The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 17, 179 224.
4. Axtner, J. Sommer, S. 2007 : Gene duplication, allelic diversity, selection processes and adaptive value of MHC class II DRB genes of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Immunogenetics 59, 417 426.
5. Babik, W. Radwan, J. 2007 : Sequence diversity of MHC class II DRB genes in the bank vole Myodes glareolus. Acta Theriol. 52, 227 235.
6. de Bakker, P. I. W., McVean, G., Sabeti, P. C., Miretti, M. M., Green, T., Marchini, J., Ke, X. Y., Monsuur, A. J., Whittaker, P., Delgado, M., Morrison, J., Richardson, A., Walsh, E. C., Gao, X. J., Galver, L., Hart, J., Hafler, D. A., Pericak-Vance, M., Todd, J. A., Daly, M. J., Trowsdale, J., Wijmenga, C., Vyse, T. J., Beck, S., Murray, S. S., Carrington, M., Gregory, S., Deloukas, P. Rioux, J. D. 2006 : A high-resolution HLA and SNP haplotype map for disease association studies in the extended human MHC. Nat. Genet. 38, 1166 1172.
7. Bateman, A. J. 1948 : Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349 368.
8. Boehm, T. Zufall, F. 2006 : MHC peptides and the sensory evaluation of genotype. Trends Neurosci. 29, 100 107.
9. Bonneaud, C., Chastel, O., Federici, P., Westerdahl, H. Sorci, G. 2006 : Complex Mhc-based mate choice in a wild passerine. Proc. R. Soc. B - Biol. Sci. 273, 1111 1116.
10. Brown, J. L. Eklund, A. 1994 : Kin recognition and the major histocompatibiliy complex: an integrative review. Am. Nat. 143, 435 461.
11. Charlesworth, B. Charlesworth, D. 1999 : The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74, 329 340.
12. Christova, T. Yu. 2002 : Intraspecies interactions in the bank vole: field observation data. Doklady Biol. Sci. 382, 59 61.
13. Ekblom, R., Saether, S. A., Grahn, M., Fiske, P., Kalas, J. A. Hoglund, J. 2004 : Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Mol. Ecol. 13, 3821 3828.
14. Freeman-Gallant, C. R., Meguerdichian, M., Wheelwright, N. T. Sollecito, S. V. 2003 : Social pairing and female mating fidelity predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in a songbird. Mol. Ecol. 12, 3077 3083.
15. Grafen, A. 1990 : Do animals really recognize kin? Anim. Behav. 39, 42 54.
16. Hedrick, P. W. Black, F. L. 1997 : HLA and mate selection: no evidence in South Amerindians. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 505 511.
17. Horne, T. J. Ylonen, H. 1998 : Heritabilities of dominance-related traits in male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evolution 52, 894 899.
18. Hunt, J., Bussiere, L. F., Jennions, M. D. Brooks, R. 2004 : What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 329 333.
19. Kelley, J., Walter, L. Trowsdale, J. 2005 : Comparative genomics of major histocompatibility complexes. Immunogenetics 56, 683 695.
20. Klemme, I., Eccard, J. A., Gerlach, G., Horne, T. J. Ylonen, H. 2006 : Does it pay to be a dominant male in a promiscuous species? Ann. Zool. Fennici 43, 248 257.
21. Koskela, E., Mappes, T. Ylonen, H. 1997 : Territorial behaviour and reproductive success of bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus females. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 341 49.
22. Kruczek, M. 2007 : Recognition of kin in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Physiol. Behav. 90, 483 489.
23. Labocha, M. K., Sadowska, E. T., Baliga, K., Semer, A. K. Koteja, P. 2004 : Individual variation and repeatability of basal metabolism in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 271, 367 372.
24. Lampert, K. P., Bernal, X. E., Rand, A. S., Mueller, U. G. Ryan, M. J. 2006 : No evidence for female mate choice based on genetic similarity in the tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 796 804.
25. Landry, C., Garant, D., Duchesne, P. Bernatchez, L. 2001 : 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 268, 1279 1285.
26. Lanyon, C. V., Rushton, S. P., O'Donnell, A. G., Goodfellow, M., Ward, A. C., Petrie, M., Jensen, S. P., Gosling, L. M. Penn, D. J. 2007 : Murine scent mark microbial communities are genetically determined. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 576 583.
27. Leinders-Zufall, T., Brennan, P., Widmayer, P., Chandramani, P., Maul-Pavicic, A., Jager, M., Li, X. H., Breer, H., Zufall, F. Boehm, T. 2004 : MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306, 1033 1037.
28. Mays, H. L. Hill, G. E. 2004 : Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 554 559.
29. McClelland, E. E., Penn, D. J. Potts, W. K. 2003 : Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote superiority during coinfection. Infect. Immun. 71, 2079 2086.
30. Milinski, M. 2006 : The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 159 186.
31. Milinski, M., Griffiths, S., Wegner, K. M., Reusch, T. B. H., Haas-Assenbaum, A. Boehm, T. 2005 : Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4414 4418.
32. Mills, S. C., Alatalo, R. V., Koskela, E., Mappes, J., Mappes, T. Oksanen, T. A. 2007 : Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution 61, 1748 1757.
33. Neff, B. D. Pitcher, T. E. 2005 : Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 14, 19 38.
34. Olsson, M., Madsen, T., Nordby, J., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B. Wittsell, H. 2003 : Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 270, S254 S256.
35. Paterson, S. Pemberton, J. M. 1997 : No evidence for major histocompatibility complex-dependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 264, 1813 1819.
36. Penn, D. J. 2002 : The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108, 1 21.
37. Penn, D. Potts, W. K. 1998a : The influence of major histocompatibility (MHC) genes on odor and mating preferences. Adv. Immunol. 69, 411 436.
38. Penn, D. Potts, W. K. 1998b : Wild house mice distinguish MHC-determined odors without training. Physiol. Behav. 64, 235 243.
39. Piertney, S. B. Oliver, M. K. 2006 : The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96, 7 21.
40. Potts, W. K. Wakeland, E. K. 1990 : Evolution of diversity at the major histocompatibility complex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 181 187.
41. Potts, W. K., Manning, C. J. Wakeland, E. K. 1994 : The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity - an experimental test. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 346, 369 378.
42. Puurtinen, M., Ketola, T. Kotiaho, J. S. 2005 : Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 157 158.
43. Radwan, J. 2007 : Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms. Genetica, doi :.
44. Radwan, J., Chadzinska, M., Cichon, M., Mills, S. C., Matula, B., Sadowska, E. T., Baliga, K., Stanisz, A., Lopuch, S. Koteja, P. 2006 : Metabolic costs of sexual advertisement in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 859 869.
45. Ratkiewicz, M. Borkowska, A. 2000 : Multiple paternity in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus): field and experimental data. Zeitschrift Fur Saugetierkunde - Int. J. Mamm. Biol. 65, 6 14.
46. Reusch, T. B. H., Haberli, M. A., Aeschlimann, P. B. Milinski, M. 2001 : Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414, 300 302.
47. Roberts, S. C. Gosling, L. M. 2003 : Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nat. Genet. 35, 103 106.
48. Santos, P. S. C., Schinemann, J. A., Gabardo, J. Bicalho, M. D. 2005 : New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students. Horm. Behav. 47, 384 388.
49. Sauermann, U., Nurnberg, P., Bercovitch, F. B., Berard, J. D., Trefilov, A., Widdig, A., Kessler, M., Schmidtke, J. Krawczak, M. 2001 : Increased reproductive success of MHC class II heterozygous males among free-ranging rhesus macaques. Hum. Genet. 108, 249 254.
50. Smulders, M. J. M., Snoek, L. B., Booy, G. Vosman, B. 2003 : Complete loss of MHC genetic diversity in the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) population in the Netherlands. Consequences for conservation strategies. Conserv. Genet. 4, 441 451.
51. Sommer, S. 2005a : The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation. Front. Zool. 12, 16.
52. Sommer, S. 2005b : Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in a monogamous rodent. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 181 189.
53. Tomkins, J. L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J. S. Tregenza, T. 2004 : Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 323 328.
54. Tregenza, T. Wedell, N. 2000 : Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1013 1027.
55. Trivers, R. L. 1972 : Parental investment and sexual selection. In : Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (Campbell, B., ed Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136 179.
56. Trowsdale, J. 1995 : Both man and bird and beast - comparative organisation of MHC genes. Immunogenetics 41, 1 17.
57. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F. Paepke, A. J. 1995 : MHC-dependent mate prererences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B - Biol. Sci. 260, 245 249.
58. Westerdahl, H. 2004 : No evidence of an MHC-based female mating preference in great reed warblers. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2465 2470.
59. Yamazaki, K., Boyse, E. A., Mike, V., Thaler, H. T., Mathieson, B. J., Abbott, J., Boyse, J., Zayas, Z. A. Thomas, L. 1976 : Control of mating preferences in mice by genes of major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 144, 1324 1335.
60. Ylonen, H. Horne, T. J. 2002 : Infanticide and effectiveness of pup protection in bank voles: does the mother recognise a killer? Acta Ethol. 4, 97 101.
61. Zahavi, A. 1975 : Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205 214.
62. Zeh, J. A. Zeh, D. W. 2003 : Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility (invited article). Ethology 109, 929 950.