Heritabilities of dominance-related traits in male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus)

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 894-899

  Horne, Taina J ^a   Ylönen, Hannu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Additive genetic variance; Dominance; Genetic correlation; Heritability; Phenotypic correlations; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE; HERITABILITY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATING PREFERENCE; RODENT;

ANIMALIA; CLETHRIONOMYS GLAREOLUS; MURIDAE; RODENTIA;

EID: 2642607876     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03714.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ALATALO, R. V., J. MAPPES, AND M. A. ELGAR. 1997. Heritabilities and paradigm shifts. Nature 385:402-403.
2. ANDERSSON, M. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17:375-393.
3. _. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816.
4. BAKKER, T. C. M. 1986. Aggressiveness in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): a behaviour-genetic study. Behaviour 98: 1-144.
5. BARNARD, C. J., AND J. FITZSIMONS. 1988. Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: the effect of kinship, familiarity and social interference on intersexual interaction. Anim. Behav. 36:1078-1090.
6. BARRETTE, C. 1987. Dominance cannot be inherited. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:251.
7. BORGIA, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Pp. 19-80 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
8. BONDRUP-NIELSEN, S., AND F. KARLSSON. 1985. Movements and spatial patterns in populations of Clethrionomys species: a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 22:385-392.
9. BRINCK, C., AND I. HOFFMEYER. 1984. Marking urine and preputial secretion of male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus L.). Chemical analyses and behavioural tests. J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 1295-1307.
10. BRONSON, F. H., AND H. M. MARSDEN. 1973. The preputial gland as an indicator of social dominance in male mice. Behav. Biol. 9:625-628.
11. BUJALSKA, G. 1973. The role of spacing behaviour among females in the regulation of reproduction in the bank vole. J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 19:465-474.
12. CADE, W. H. 1984. Genetic variation underlying sexual behavior and reproduction. Am. Zool. 24:355-366.
13. CHEVERUD, J. M. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42:958-968.
14. DEFRIES, J. C., AND G. E. MCCLHARN. 1970. Social dominance and Darwinian fitness in the laboratory mouse. Am. Nat. 104:408-411.
15. _. 1972. Behavioral genetics and the fine structure of mouse populations: a study in microevolution. Evol. Biol. 5:279-291.
16. DESJARDINS, C., J. A. MARUNIAK, AND F. H. BRONSON. 1973. Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns. Science 182:939-941.
17. DEWSBURY, D. A. 1982. Dominance rank, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction. Q. Rev. Biol. 57:135-159.
18. _. 1990. Fathers and sons: genetic factors and social dominance in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus. Anim. Behav. 39: 284-289.
19. _. 1991. Genes influence behaviour. Anim. Behav. 42:499-500.
20. DINGLE, H., AND J. P. HEGMANN. 1982. Genetics and evolution of life histories. Springer, New York.
21. DREWS, C. 1993. The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125:283-313.
22. DRICKAMER, L. C. 1992. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Anim. Behav. 43:868-870.
23. FALCONER, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3d ed. Longman, Harlow, U.K.
24. FISHER, R. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2d ed. Dover, New York.
25. GIPPS, J. H. W. 1985a. Spacing behaviour and male reproductive ecology in voles of the genus Clethrionomys, Ann. Zool. Fenn. 22:343-351.
26. _. 1985b. The behaviour of bank voles. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 55:61-87.
27. GUSTAFSSON, T., B. ANDERSSON, AND P. MUERLING. 1980. Effect of social rank on the growth of the preputial glands in male bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Physiol. Behav. 24:689-692.
28. HAHN, M. E., AND N. SCHANZ. 1996. Issues in the genetics of social behavior: revisited. Behav. Genet. 26:463-470.
29. HAMILTON, W., AND M. ZUK. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384-387.
30. HEISLER, I. L. 1984. A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences. Evolution 38:1283-1295.
31. HOFFMANN, A. A. 1988. Heritable variation for territorial success in two Drosophila melanogaster populations. Anim. Behav. 36: 1180-1189.
32. _. 1989. Geographic variation in the territorial success of Drosophila melanogaster males. Behav. Genet. 19:241-255.
33. HOFFMANN, A. A., AND A. CACOYIANNI. 1989. Selection for territoriality in Drosophila melanogaster: correlated responses in mating success and other fitness components. Anim. Behav. 38: 23-34.
34. HOFFMEYER, I. 1982. Responses of female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) to dominant vs subordinant conspecific males and to urine odours from dominant vs. subordinant males. Behav. Neural Biol. 36:178-188.
35. HORNE, T. J., AND H. YLÖNEN. 1996. Female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) prefer dominant males; but what if there is no choice? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:401-405.
36. HOULE, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
37. HUCK, U. W., AND E. M. BANKS. 1982a. Differential attraction of females to dominant males: olfactory discrimination and mating preference in the brown lemming (Lemmus trimucronatus), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11:217-222.
38. _. 1982b. Male dominance status, female choice and mating success in the brown lemming, Lemmus trimucronatus. Anim. Behav. 30:665-675.
39. JOHNSON, R. P. 1975. Scent marking with urine in two races of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Behaviour 55:81-93.
40. KEANE, B. 1990. The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim. Behav. 40:264-273.
41. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
42. KIRKPATRICK, M., AND M. J. RYAN. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
43. KODRIC-BROWN, A., AND J. BROWN. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124:309-323.
44. LANDE, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenie traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:3721-3725.
45. LESSELS, C. M., AND P. T. BOAG. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116-121.
46. MAYNARD SMITH, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
47. _. 1985. Sexual selection, handicaps, and true fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 115:1-8.
48. MIHOK, S. 1976. Behaviour of subarctic red-backed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi athabascae). Can. J. Zool. 54:1932-1945.
49. MOORE, A. J. 1990. The inheritance of social dominance, mating behaviour and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim. Behav. 39:388-397.
50. _. 1991. Genetics, inheritance and social behaviour. Anim. Behav. 42:497-498.
51. O'DONALD, P. 1980. Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
52. PIERCE, J. D., AND D. A. DEWSBURY. 1991. Female preferences for unmated versus mated males in two species of voles Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus. J. Comp. Psychol. 105:165-171.
53. POMIANKOWSKI, A., AND A. P. MØLLER. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260:21-29.
54. REEVE, E. C. R. 1955. The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 11:357-374.
55. RISKA, B., T. PROUT, AND M. TURELLI. 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865-871.
56. ROZENFELD, F. M., E. LE BOULANG, AND R. RASMONT. 1987. Urine marking by male bank voles (Clethrionomys ghireolus Schreber, 1780; Microtidae, Rodentia) in relation to their social rank. Can. J. Zool. 65:2594-2601.
57. SCOTT, J. W., AND D. W. PFAFF. 1970. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of female mice to male urine odors. Physiol. Behav. 5:407-411.
58. SHAPIRO, L. E., AND D. A. DEWSBURY. 1986. Male dominance, female choice and male copulatory behavior in two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18:267-274.
59. SHAPIRO, L. E., D. AUSTIN, S. E. WARD, AND D. A. DEWSBURY. 1986. Familiarity and female mate choice in two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Anim. Behav. 34:90-97.
60. SIKORSKI, M. D., AND A. M. WÓJCIK. 1990. Mating system and reproductive success in a free-living population of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Pp. 193-202 in R. H. Tamarin, R. S. Ostfeld, S. R. Pugh, and G. Bujalska, eds. Social systems and population cycles in voles. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.
61. STEARNS, S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
62. STEARNS, S., G. DE JONG, AND B. NHWMAN. 1991. The effects of phenotypic plasticity on genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:122-126.
63. TAYLOR, P., AND G. WILLIAMS. 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22:392-409.
64. VIITALA, J. 1977. Social organization in cyclic subarctic populations of the voles Clethrionomys rufocanus (Sund.) and Microtus agrestis (L.). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 14:53-93.
65. VIITALA, J., AND I. HOFFMEYER. 1985. Social organization in Clethrionomys compared with Microtus and Apodemus: social odours, chemistry and biological effects. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 22:359-371.
66. WEIGENSBERG, I., AND D. A. ROFF. 1996. Natural heritabilities: can they be reliably estimated in the laboratory? Evolution 50:2149-2157.
67. WOLFF, R. J. 1985. Mating behaviour and female choice: their relation to social structure in wild caught house mice (Mus musculus) housed in a semi-natural environment. J. Zool. 1:43-51.