Comparison of CT and MRI for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliarycarcinoma

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 14, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 2208-2212

  Kim, Young Chul ^a   Park, Mi Suk ^a   Cha, Seung Whan ^b   Chung, Yong Eun ^a   Lim, Joon Suk ^a   Kim, Kyung Sik ^c   Kim, Myeong Jin ^a   Kim, Ki Whang ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatico biliary carcinoma; Paraaortic lymph node

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; METASTASIS POTENTIAL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RATING SCALE; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; AORTA; BILE DUCT TUMOR; CARCINOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; LYMPH NODE; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AORTA; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 49249127469     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.2208     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Shibata K, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 736-740
2. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 345-352
3. Niedergethmann M, Rexin M, Hildenbrand R, Knob S, Sturm JW, Richter A, Post S. Prognostic implications of routine, immunchistochemical, and molecular staging in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 1578-1587
4. Miyazaki K. Surgical strategy based on the spread mode of gallbladder carcinoma. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 106: 286-290
5. Kondo S, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Yuasa N, Sano T. Value of paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gallbladder carcinoma. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1998; 99: 728-732
6. Miyazaki I, Kayahara M, Nagakawa T. Changes in lymph node dissection for pancreatic cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 98: 610-614
7. Kondo S, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Hayakawa N. Mode of tumor spread and surgical strategy in gallbladder carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002; 387: 222-228
8. Recht A, Houlihan MJ. Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer: a review. Cancer 1995; 76: 1491-1512
9. Harika L, Weissleder R, Poos K, Papisov MI. Macromolecular intravenous contrast agent for MR lymphography: characterization and efficacy studies. Radiology 1996; 198: 365-370
10. Moghimi SM, Bonnemain B. Subcutaneous and intravenous delivery of diagnostic agents to the lymphatic system: applications in lymphoscintigraphy and indirect lymphography. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1999; 37: 295-312
11. Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1410-1427
12. Endo I, Shimada H, Tanabe M, Fujii Y, Takeda K, Morioka D, Tanaka K, Sekido H, Togo S. Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gallbladder cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 999-1007
13. Heriot AG, Grundy A, Kumar D. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 17-28
14. Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 59-66
15. Fukuda H, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Metastases to pelvic lymph nodes from carcinoma in the pelvic cavity: diagnosis using thin-section CT. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 237-242
16. De Gaetanb AM, Vecchioli A, Minordi LM, Parrella A, Gaudino S, Masselli G, Savino G. Role of diagnostic imaging in abdominal lymphadenopathy. Rays 2000; 25: 463-484
17. Wallis F, Gilbert FJ. Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: an overview. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999; 44: 117-125
18. Schima W, Fugger R, Schober E, Oettl C, Wamser P, Grabenwoger F, Ryan JM, Novacek G. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 717-724
19. Misselwitz B. MR contrast agents in lymph node imaging. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 375-382
20. Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 1991; 180: 319-322
21. Noji T, Kondo S, Hirano S, Tanaka E, Ambo Y, Kawarada Y, Morikawa T. CT evaluation of paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with biliary cancer. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 739-743
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
23. Bellomi M, Bonomo G, Landoni F, Villa G, Leon ME, Bocciolone L, Maggioni A, Viale G. Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2469-2474
24. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal MR. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-anaIysis. JAMA 1997; 178: 1096-1101
25. Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo SS, Kang S, Lee S, Kim JY, Kim YH, Lee JS, Chung HH, Lee JH, Park SY. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W538-W543
26. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Takahara T, Hachiya J, Atomi Y. A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 556-559
27. Blomqvist L. Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer--computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Surg 2003; 92: 35-43
28. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 759-766
29. Grubnic S, Vinnicombe Sj, Norman AR, Husband JE. MR evaluation of normal retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph nodes. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 193-200; discussion 201-204
30. Ohtani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Moto T, Hatakeyama K. Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21: 195-201