Impact of a nursing information system on practice patterns in Taiwan

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 207-214

  Lee, Ting Ting ^a   Mills, Mary Etta ^b   Lu, Ming Huei ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NURSING AND MANAGEMENT COLLEGE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Nursing information system; Observation; Practice pattern; Work sampling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSING; TAIWAN;

DATA COLLECTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NURSING; NURSING RECORDS; TAIWAN;

EID: 49249123297     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304807.69240.9e     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):69-84.
2. Stricklin MLV, Bierer SB, Struk C. Home care nurses' attitudes toward computers: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Stronge and Brodt instrument. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(2):103-311.
3. Lee T. Evaluation of computerized nursing care plan: instrument development. J Prof Nurs. 2004;20(4):230-238.
4. Dillon TW, Blankenship R, Crews T. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005; 23(3):139-145.
5. Alpay L, Russell A. Information technology training in primary care: the nurses' voice. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20(4):136-142.
6. Lee T, Yeh C, Ho L. Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs. 2002;39(1):61-67.
7. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328(7499):1162-1165.
8. Darbyshire P. ''Rage against the machine?'': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):17-25.
9. Rotich JK, Hanna TJ, Smith FE, et al. Installing and implementing a computer-based patient record system in sub-Saharan Africa:the Mosoriot medical record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(4):295-303.
10. Asaro PV. Synchronized time-motion study in the emergency department using a handheld computer application. Medinfo. 2004;11(pt 1):701-705.
11. Bosma RJ, Rood E, Oudemansvan S, Van der Spoel JI, Wester JPJ, Zandstra DF. Intensive care information system reduces documentation time of the nurses after cardiothoracic surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(1):83-90.
12. Korst LM, Eusebio-Angeja AC, Chamorro T, Aydin CE, Gregory KD. Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. J Nurs Adm. 2003;33(1):24-30.
13. Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M, Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(3):132-138.
14. Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505-516.
15. Duffield C, Wise W. Tell me what we do. Using work sampling to find the answer. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2003;20(3):19-23.
16. Harrison L, Nixon G. Nursing activity in general intensive care. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:158-167.
17. Pelletier D, Duffield C, Donoghue J. Documentation and the transfer of clinical information in two aged care settings. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2005;22(4):40-45.
18. Pelletier D, Duffield C. Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns. Nurs Health Sci. 2003;5:31-38.
19. Capuano T, Bokovoy J, Halkins D, Hitchings K. Work flow analysis: eliminating non-value-added work. J Nurs Adm. 2004; 34(5):246-256.
20. Fitzgerald M, Pearson A, Walsh K, Long L, Heinrich N. Patterns of nursing: a review of nursing in a large metropolitan hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(3):326-332.
21. Lising M, Kennedy C. A multimethod approach to evaluating critical care information systems. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005; 23(1):27-37.
22. Munro BH. Logistic regression. In: Munro BH, ed. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:301-320.
23. Hughes RA. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(4):340-346.
24. van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(3):235-243.
25. Lee T. Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:344-353.
26. Kirkley D, Rewick D. Evaluating clinical information systems. J Nurs Adm. 2003;33(12):643-651.
27. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004; 22(6):337-344.
28. Lee T. Users' eperiences of a nursing information system in Taiwan: One year after its implementation. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(6):763-771.
29. Husting PM, Cintron L. Healthcare information system: education lessons learned. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2003;19(5):249-253.
30. Lee T. Adopting a personal digital assistant system: application of Lewin's change theory. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(4):487-496.
31. Dienemann J, Van de Castle B. The impact of healthcare informatics on the organization. J Nurs Adm. 2003;33(11):557-562.
32. Hunt EC, Sproat SB, Kitzmiller RR. The Nursing Informatics Implementation Guide. New York, NY: Springer; 2004.
33. Lee T, Lee T, Lin K, Chang P. Factors affecting the use of nursing information systems in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(2):170-178.