Nursing information: Users' experiences of a system in Taiwan one year after its implementation

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 763-771

  Lee, Ting Ting ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Focus groups; Nurses; Nursing; Nursing information systems; Qualitative study; Users' experiences

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049089140     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02041.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alasad J (2002) Managing technology in the intensive care unit: the nurses' experiences. International Journal of Nursing Studies 39, 407 413.
2. Alpay L Russell A (2002) Information technology training in primary care: the nurses' voice. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 20, 136 142.
3. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C Eichstadter R (2003) Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a two-year study. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 69 84.
4. Andersen SE (2006) Implementing a new drug perceived system: a qualitative study of difficulties perceived by physicians and nurses. Quality Safety in Health Care 11, 19 24.
5. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M, Payne TH, Massaro TA, Frantz GL Lyman JA (2003) A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 188 200.
6. Barr B (2002) Managing change during an information systems transition. AORN Journal 75, 1085 1088.
7. Bond GE (2006) Lessons learned from the implementation of a web-based nursing intervention. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 24, 66 74.
8. Bosma L, Balen RM, Davidson E Jewesson PJ (2003) Point of care use of a personal digital assistant for patient consultation management: experience of an intravenous resource nurse team in a major Canadian teaching hospital. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 21, 179 185.
9. Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': Nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 17 25.
10. Dienemann J van de Castle B (2003) The impact of healthcare informatics on the organisation. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 557 562.
11. Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG Gorman PN (2004) Impacts of computerised physician documentation in a teaching hospital: Perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 11, 300 309.
12. Garrison GM, Bernard ME Rasmussen NH (2002) 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Family Medicine 34, 241 244.
13. Handly M, Grubb S, Keefe N Martin K (2003) Essential activities for implementing a clinical information system in public health nursing. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 14 16.
14. Houston TK, Ray MN, Crawford MA, Giddens T Berner ES (2003) Patient perceptions of physicians use of handheld computers. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding 2003, 299 303.
15. Hughes RA (2003) Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing 42, 340 346.
16. Hunt EC, Sproat SB Kitzmiller RR (2004) The Nursing Informatics Implementation Guide. Springer, New York.
17. Kaufman D, Roberts WD, Merrill J, Lai T Bakken S (2006) Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development and implementation. Nursing Research 55, S37 S42.
18. Kirkley D Rewick D (2003) Evaluating clinical information systems. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 643 651.
19. Knoedler J (2003) IT integration transforms the care continuum. Nursing Management 34 (Suppl. 8, 10.
20. Korst LM, Eusebio-Angeja AC, Chamorro T, Aydin CE Gregory KD (2003) Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 24 30.
21. Kurihara Y, Kusunose T, Okabayashi Y, Nyu K, Fujikawa K, Miyai C Okuhara Y (2001) Full implementation of computerized nursing records system at Kochi medical school hospital in Japan. Computers in Nursing, 19, 122 129.
22. Lee T (2004) Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model. Applied Nursing Research 17, 231 238.
23. Lee T (2005) Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 344 353.
24. Lee T (2006a) Adopting a personal digital assistant: application of Lewis change theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55, 487 496.
25. Lee T (2006b) Nurse administrators' experiences in managing PDA use for inpatient units. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 24, 280 287.
26. Lee T (2007) Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: Early stage of technology implementation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 25, 294 300.
27. Lee T, Yeh C Ho L (2002) Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing 39, 61 67.
28. Lewin, K (1951) Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Row, New York.
29. Mansell I, Bennett G, Northway R, Mead D Moseley L (2004) The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection. Nurse Researcher 11, 79 88.
30. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB Medow MA (2004) Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ 328, 1162 1165.
31. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB Medow MA (2005) Organisational and physician perspectives about facilitating handheld computer use in clinical practice: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 12, 568 575.
32. McLafferty I (2004) Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48, 187 194.
33. van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J Hasman A (2003) Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 235 243.
34. Miles MB Huberman AM (1994) An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
35. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B Jackson D (2004) Electronic health records documentation in nursing. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22, 227 344.
36. Nahm R Poston I (2000) Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Computers in Nursing 18, 220 229.
37. Rogers, E (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York.
38. Sandelowski M (1986) The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science 8, 27 37.
39. Schoolfield M Orduńa A (2001) Understanding staff nurse responses to change: utilization of a grief-change framework to facilitate innovation. Clinical Nurse Specialist 15, 224 229.
40. Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M Oman K (2005) Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 23, 132 138.
41. Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
42. Urden LD (2003) Don't Forget to Ask: Using Focus Groups to Assess Outcomes. Outcomes Management 7, 1 3.
43. Webb B (2002) Using focus groups as a research method: a personal experience. Journal of Nursing Management 10, 27 35.