What is the appropriate regulatory response to wardrobe malfunctions= Fining stations for television sex and violence

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 387-407

  Hennessy, Michael ^a,b   Bleakley, Amy ^b,c   Busse, Peter ^b,d   Fishbein, Martin ^b,e  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49149119478     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838150802205553     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1-33.
2. Anderson, C., Berkowitz, B., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L., Johnson, J., Linz, D., et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81-110.
3. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
4. Aubrey, J., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety versus timing: Gender differences in college students' sexual expectations as predicted by exposure to sexually oriented television. Communication Research, 30, 432-460.
5. Bushman, B., & Cantor, J. (2003). Media ratings for violence and sex. American Psychologist, 58, 130-141.
6. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.
7. Chia, S., & Günther, A. (2006) ). How media contribute to misperceptions of social norms about sex. Mass Communication & Society, 9, 301-320.
8. Committee on Public Education. (2001). Media violence. Pediatrics, 108, 1222-1226.
9. Davison, W. (1983). The third-person effect in communications, Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
10. Duck, J., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-93.
11. Edwards, H., & Berman, M. (1994-95). Regulating violence on television. Northwestern University Law review, 89, 1487-1566.
12. Escobar-Chaves, S., Tortolero, S., Markham, C., Low, B., Eitel, P., & Thickstun, P. (2005). Impact of the media on adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors, Pediatrics, 176, 303-326.
13. Fallow, K. (2004). The big chill? Congress and the FCC crack down on indecency. Communications Lawyer, 22, 1, 25-32.
14. Federal Communications Commission. (2006). Obscenity, indecency and profanity-frequently asked questions. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.fcc.gov/eb/oip/FAQ.html #TheLaw
15. Fishbein, M. (2004). Intentional behavior. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, 2, 329-334.
16. Fisher, D., Hill, D., Grube, J., & Gruber, E. (2004), Sex on American television: An analysis across program genres and network types. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 529-553.
17. Flora, D., & Curran, P. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491.
18. Fox News/Opinion Dynamics. (2004, March 5). Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http:// nationaljournal.com/members/pol ltrack/2004/national/04medla.htm#8
19. Funk, J., Elliot, R., Urman, M., & Flores, G. (1999). The attitudes toward violence scale: A measure for adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1123-1136.
20. Gallup. (2004, February 11). Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://nationaljournal.com/ members/polltrack/2004/natlonal/04media.htm#9
21. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effect: Advances in theory and research (43-68). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Golan, G. (2002). Religiosity and the third-person effect. Journal of Media and Religion, 1, 105-120.
23. Greenland, S., Schlesselman, J., & Criqui, M. (1986). The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 203-208.
24. Hemphill, T. (2003). Self-regulation, public issue management and marketing practices in the US entertainment industry. Journal of Public Affairs, 3, 338-357.
25. Hetsroni, A. (2007). Three decades of sexual content on prime-time network programming: A longitudinal meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 57, 318-348.
26. Hoerrner, K. (1999). Symbolic politics: Congressional interest in television violence from 1950 to 1996. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 684-698.
27. Hoffner, C., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J., Hubbs, L., Kamigaki, S., Kowalczyk, L., et al. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence: The role of the third-person effect and news exposure. Communication Research, 26, 726-742.
28. Hoffner, C., Plotkin, R., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J., Kamigaki, S., Hubbs, L., et al, (2001). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Journal of Communication, 51, 726-742.
29. Holbert, R., & Stephenson, M. (2003). The importance of indirect effects in media effects research; Testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 556-572.
30. Hoy, M., & Andrews, J. (2006). Entertainment industry ratings disclosures and the clean and conspicuous standard. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40, 117-143.
31. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Huesmann, L., Moise-Titus, J., Podolski, C., & Eron, L. (2003). Longitudinal relations between children's exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39, 201-221.
33. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
35. Knobloch, S., Callison, C., Chen, L., Fritzsche, A., & Zillmann, D. (2005). Children's sex-stereotyped self-socialization through selective exposure to entertainment: Cross-cultural experiments in Germany, China, and the United States. Journal of Communication, 55, 122-138.
36. Knowledge Networks (2006). Field report: Annenberg National Health Communication Survey 2005. Menlo Park, CA.
37. Kunkel, D., Biely, E., Eyal, K., Cope-Farrar, K., Donnerstein, E., & Fandrich, R. (2003). Sex on TV3: A biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: The Kaiser Family Foundation.
38. Kunkel, D., Cope, K., & Colvin, C. (1996). Sexual messages on family hour television: Content and context. Oakland and Menlo Park, CA: Children Now and Kaiser Family Foundation.
39. Kunkel, D., Cope-Farrar, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2001). Sex on TV2: A biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: The Kaiser Family Foundation,
40. L'Engle, K., Brown, J., & Kenneavy, K. (2006). The mass media are an important context for adolescents' sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 186-192.
41. MacCallum, R., Wegener, D., Uchino, B., & Fabrigar, L. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
42. Martino, S., Collins, R., Kanouse, D., Elliot, M., & Berry, S. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television's sexual content and adolescent's sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 914-924.
43. Maruyama, G. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Middlestadt, S., Bhatacharyya, K., Rosenbaum, J., & Fishbein, M. (1996). The use of theory based semi-structured elicitation questionnaires: Formative research for CDCs prevention marketing initiative. Public Health Reports,111, (Suppl. 1), 18-27.
45. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus user's guide, fourth edition. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.
46. Nabi, R., & Sullivan, J. (2001). Does television viewing relate to engagement in protective action against crime? A cultivation analysis from of theory of reasoned action perspective. Communication Research, 28, 802-825.
47. Paul, B., Salwen, M., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 57-85.
48. Perloff, R. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
49. Perry, D., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699-1712.
50. Pew Research Center (1999, May 20). Survey conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://nationaljournal. com/members/polltrack/ 1999/national/99media.htm#PEW%20RESEARCH%20CENTER
51. Potter, W., & Chang, I. (1990). Television exposure measures and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 313-333,
52. Potter, W., & Warren, R. (1996). Considering policies to protect children from TV violence. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 116-138.
53. Rivadeneyra, R., & Ward, L. (2007), Distorted reflections: Media exposure and Latino adolescents' conceptions of self, Media Psychology, 9, 261-290.
54. Romer, D., Kenski, K., Winneg, K., Adasiewicz, C., & Jamieson, K. (2006). Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004: The National Annenberg Election Survey. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55. Salwen, M., & Dupagne, M. (1999). The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media's influence and Immoral consequences. Communication Research, 26, 523-549.
56. Scharrer, E. (2002). Third-person perception and television violence: The role of out-group stereotyping in perceptions of susceptibility to effect. Communication Research, 29, 681-704.
57. Schneider, L. (1994-95). Warning: Television violence may be harmful to children; but the First Amendment may foil congressional attempts to legislate against it. University of Miami Law Review, 49, 477-530.
58. Shapiro, R., & Mahajan, H. (1986), Gender differences in policy preferences; A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 42-61.
59. Shipley, B. (2002). Cause and correlation in biology: A user's guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Signorielli, N. (2003). Prime-time violence 1993-2001 : Has the picture really changed? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 36-57.
61. Slater, M. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281-303.
62. Smith, T. (1984). The polls: Gender and attitudes toward violence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 384-396.
63. Somers, C., & Tynan J. (2006). Consumption of sexual dialogue and content on television and adolescent sexual outcomes: Multiethnic findings. Adolescence, 41, 15-38.
64. Tolman, D., Kim, J., Schooler, D., & Sorsoli, C. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus, Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 84.e9-84.e16.
65. United States Census Bureau (2000). Population by race and Hispanic or Latino origin, for all ages and for 18 years and over, for the United States: 2000. Retrieved March 28, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/populatlon/ cen2000/phc-t1/tab01.pdf
66. United States Code, Title 18, Section 1464 (2006, January 2) . Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe? getdoc+uscview+t17t20+725+0 ++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2818%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND %20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%281464%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20% 20%20%20.
67. Ward, L. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347-388.
68. Ward, L., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents' sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133-156.
69. Wiley, R., & Secrest, I. (2005). Recent developments in program content regulation. Federal Communications Law Journal, 57, 235-242.