A structural equations analysis of revealed and stated travel mode and activity choices

Transportmetrica

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 97-115

  Sakano, Ryoichi ^a   Benjamin, Julian M ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Revealed stated preference; Structural equations model

Indexed keywords

EID: 49049120178     PISSN: 18128602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18128600808685684     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adler, T. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1979) A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research Part B, 13, 243-257.
2. Arentae, T, Aloys, B., Maarten, P. and Timmermans, H. (2006) From activity-based modeling to social event-based modeling: conceptual framework and empirical results. In IATBR (International Association for Travel Behavior Research), 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research. Kyoto, Japan 16-20 August 2006.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. and Morikawa, T. (1991) Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In M. Koshi (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proceedings of the 11th ISTTT, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 461-476.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T., Oppewal, H. and Rao, V. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preferences data. Marketing Letters, 5, 335-350.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., Benjamin, J., Lauprette, G. and Polydoropoulou, A. (1996) Impact of advance public transportation systems of travel by Dial-a-Ride. Transportation Research Record, 1557, 73-79.
6. Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Garling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Borsch-Supan, A., Delquie, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A. and Rao, V. (1999) Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters, 10, 187-203.
7. Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., Bolduc, D., Boersch-Supan, A., Brownstone, D., Bunch, D., Daly, A., de Palma, A., Gopinath, D., Karlstrom, A. and Munizaga, M. (2002a) Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges. Marketing Letters, 13, 163-175.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A., Gopinath, D., Morikawa, T. and Polydoropoulou, A. (2002b) Integration of choice and latent variable models. In H. Mahmassani (ed.), Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 431-470.
9. Benjamin, J. and Price, G. (1997) A multiple response conjoint analysis of regional urban transportation. In IATBR (International Association for Travel Behavior Research), 8th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research. Austin, Texas September 1997.
10. Benjamin, J. and Sen, L. (1982) A Manual of Procedures to Analyze Attitudes toward Transportation (DOT-RSPA-DMA-50/82/16), USDOT, Washington D.C.
11. Benjamin, J., Kurauci, S., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Sasaki, K. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1999) Forecasting paratransit ridership using discrete choice models with explicit consideration of availability. Transportation Research Record, 1618, 60-68.
12. Bhat, C.R. (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research Part B, 29, 471-483.
13. Bhat, C.R. (1997) Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transportation Research Part B, 31, 41-54.
14. Bhat, C.R. and Castelar, S. (2002) A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part B, 36, 593-616.
15. Bollen, K. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
16. Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. and Train, K. (2000) Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, 34, 315-338.
17. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L. and Handy, S.L. (2007) Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation, 34, 535-556.
18. Damm, D. (1982) Parameters of activity behavior for use in travel analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 16, 135-148.
19. de Lapperent, M. (2006) The choice of transportation for home to work trips in the French Parisian region; applications of mixed GEV models with non-linear utility functions. In IATBR (International Association for Travel Behavior Research), 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research. Kyoto, Japan 16-20 August 2006.
20. Golob, T. (1996) Model of household demand for activity participation and mobility. In T. Garling, T. Laitilla and K. Westin (eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 365-398.
21. Golob, T. and McNally, M. (1997) A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transportation Research Part B, 31, 177-194.
22. Hanson, S. (1986) Dimensions of the urban transportation problem. In S. Hanson (ed.), The Geography of Urban Transportation, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3-23.
23. Johansson, M., Heldt, T. and Johansson, P. (2006) The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 507-525.
24. Kelloway, K. (1998) Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Kitamura, R. (1983) A sequential trip chaining approach to trip chaining behavior. In TRB (Transportation Research Board), 63rd Annual Meeting, January 1983, Washington, D.C.
26. Kitamura, R. (1984) A model of daily time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips. Transportation Research Part B, 18, 255-266.
27. Kitamura, R. and Kermanshah, M. (1983) Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choice. Transportation Research Record, 944, 22-30.
28. Koppelman, F. and Pas, E.I. (1980) Travel-choice behavior: models of perceptions, feelings, preference, and choice. Transportation Research Record, 765, 26-33.
29. Lu, X. and Pas, E.I. (1999) Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 33, 1-18.
30. Morikawa, T., Ben-Akiva, M. and McFadden, D. (2002) Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. In P.H. Franses and A.L. Montgomery (eds.), Econometric Models in Marketing, Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 16, Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 29-55.
31. Murakami, E. and Ulberg, C. (1997) The Puget Sound transportation panel. In T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long (eds.), Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 159-192.
32. Pas, E.I. (1986) The urban transportation planning process. In S. Hanson (ed.), The Geography of Urban Transportation, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 49-72.
33. Puget Sound Regional Council (1996) Puget Sound Transportation Panel Survey 1989 -1994. PSRC, Seattle, WA.
34. Walker, J. (2001) Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables. Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.