Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-32

  Hyung, Jin Won ^b   Byung, Ihn Choi ^a   Se, Hyung Kim ^a   Young, Il Kim ^a   Byung, Jae Youn ^a   Joon, Koo Han ^a  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

3 dimensional; Colon; Computed tomography; CT; Multidetector row; Phantoms; Technology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLLIMATOR; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 11144288670     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Radiology. 1996;200:30-31.
2. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, et al. Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol. 1999;31:110-124.
3. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology. 2001;219:461-465.
4. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo Fortschr Geh Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2001;173:1069-1071.
5. Beaulieu CF, Napel S, Daniel BL, et al. Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:656-663.
6. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colonography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:284-290.
7. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1181-1184.
8. Dachmann AH, Liebermann J, Osnis RB, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colonography. Radiology. 1997;203:427-430.
9. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Mangiapane F, et al. Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:459-466.
10. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Meier N, et al. CT colonography: protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT-study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology. 2003;228:753-759.
11. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Hawes RH, et al. Screening colonoscopy in symptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:64-67.
12. Godreau CJ. Office-based colonoscopy in a family practice. Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12:313-320.
13. Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, et al. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract: therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:672-676.
14. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;15:347-351.
15. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-28.
16. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:125-127.
17. Gelfand DW, Chen MY, Ott DJ. Benign colorectal neoplasms undetected by colonoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol. 1992;17:344-346.
18. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:17-23.
19. Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Anderson SM, et al. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:173-176.