Post earthquake prioritization of bridge inspections

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 131-146

  Ranf, R T ^a   Eberhard, M O ^a   Malone, S ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; TRUSSES;

BRIDGE INSPECTIONS; FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND MOTION INTENSITY; GROUND-MOTION PARAMETERS; POST EARTHQUAKE PRIORITIZATION;

EARTHQUAKES;

ACCELERATION; BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; GROUND MOTION; PRIORITIZATION; SOFTWARE;

UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 34047249106     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2428313     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Basöz, N. I., Kiremidjian, A. S., King, S. A., and Law, K. H., 1999. Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 15 (1), 25-53.
2. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2002. ShakeMap and GIS Technologies Demonstrated to Expedite Caltrans Earthquake Response, Research Notes, The GeoResearch Group, GRG Vol. 1. No. 1, December, Sacramento, CA.
3. Coffman, H., 2005. Washington State Department of Transportation, personal communication.
4. Dönmez, C., and Pujol, S., 2005. Spatial distribution of damage caused by the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey, Earthquake Spectra 21 (1), 53-70.
5. Douglas, B. M., and Reid, H. R., 1982. Dynamic tests and system identification of bridges, ASCE J. Struct. Div. 108 (10), 2295-2312.
6. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 2001. The Nisqually Earthquake of 28 February 2001: Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, Oakland, CA.
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1999. Direct Physical Damage to Transportation Systems, Chapter 7, in HAZUS 99 Service Release 1 (SR1) Technical Manual, Washington D.C.
8. Jernigan, J. B., and Hwang, H., 2002. Development of bridge fragility curves, 7th US. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), Boston, Mass.
9. Malone, S., Eberhard, M. O., La Belle, J., and Ranf, R. T., 2005. Information Tools to Improve Post-Earthquake Prioritization of WSDOT Bridge Inspections, Washington State Department of Transportation Report No. WA-RD 602.1, Olympia, WA.
10. Mander, J. B., 1999. Fragility Curve Development for Assessing the Seismic Vulnerability of Highway Bridges, Research Progress and Accomplishments: 1997-1999, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
11. Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (PNSN), 2001. ShakeMap, University of Washington, http://www.geophys.washington.edu/shake/0102281854/ intensity.html
12. Ranf, R. T., Eberhard, M. O., and Berry, M. P., 2001. Damage to Bridges during the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake, PEER Report 2001/15, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
13. Rojahn, C., King, S. A., Huang, M., and Shakal, A. F., 2004. ATC-54 guidelines for using strong-motion data and ShakeMaps in post-earthquake response, Proceedings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver B.C., Canada, August 1-6, Paper No. 2938.
14. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H. K., and Kim, S. H., 2000a. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development, J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12), 1287-1296.
15. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T., 2000b. Statistical analysis of fragility curves, J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12), 1224-1231.
16. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway Administration, 2005. National Bridge Inventory, Washington, D.C.
17. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2005a. ANSS - Advanced National Seismic System, http://www.anss.org/
18. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2005b. ShakeMap, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/shakemap/
19. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), 2000. Washington State Bridge Inventory, Olympia, WA.
20. Wald, D. J., 2005. Personal communication.
21. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., Kanimori, H., Scrivner, C. W., and Worden, B., 1999. TriNet "ShakeMaps" rapid generation of instrumental ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California, Earthquake Spectra 15 (3), 537-556.
22. Wald, D. J., Naecker, P. A., Roblee, C., and Turner, L., 2003. Development of a ShakeMap-Based Response System within Caltrans, in Advancing Mitigation Technologies and Disaster Response for Lifeline Systems, J. Beavers (Ed.), Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Monograph No. 25, August American Society of Civil Engineers, 113-122.