Appreciation of research information in patients with bipolar disorder

Bipolar Disorders

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 635-646

  Misra, Sahana ^a,b   Socherman, Robert ^a,b   Hauser, Peter ^a,b,c   Ganzini, Linda ^a,b,c  

^a PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Appreciation; Bipolar disorder decision making capacity; Therapeutic misconception

Indexed keywords

NEUROLEPTIC AGENT; PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HAMILTON SCALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MANIA; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; METHODOLOGY; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; OPTIMISM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

ADULT; AFFECT; BIPOLAR DISORDER; COMPREHENSION; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; OREGON; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 48949120687     PISSN: 13985647     EISSN: 13995618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2008.00609.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That may Affect Decision Making Capacity, Vol. 1: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Washington, DC: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 1998.
2. Dunn LB, Lindamer LA, Palmer BW, Golshan S, Schneiderman LJ, Jeste DV. Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 10: 142-150.
3. Stiles PG, Poythress NG, Hall A, Falkenbach D, Williams R. Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 780-785.
4. Carpenter WT, Gold JM, Lahti AC et al. Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 533-538.
5. Wirshing DA, Wirshing WC, Marder SR, Liberman RP, Mintz J. Informed consent: Assessment of comprehension. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1508-1511.
6. Misra S, Socherman R, Park BS, Hauser P, Ganzini L. Influence of mood state on capacity to consent to research in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2008; 10: 303-309.
7. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1998; 319: 1635-1638.
8. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987; 17: 202-204.
9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh HR. 'Mini-Mental State.' A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.
10. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 (Suppl. 20): 22-33.
11. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6: 278-296.
12. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE et al. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 429-435.
13. Cairns R, Maddock C, Buchanan A et al. Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 379-385.
14. Yen CF, Chen CS, Yeh ML, Yang SJ, Ke JH, Yen JY. Changes of insight in manic episodes and influencing factors. Compr Psychiatry 2003; 44: 404-408.
15. Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic Depressive Illness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990.
16. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Brody JL et al. Patient and psychiatrist ratings of hypothetical schizophrenia research protocols: Assessment of harm potential and factors influencing participation decisions. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 573-584.
17. Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M et al. Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 500-506.
18. Candilis PJ, Geppert CM, Fletcher KE et al. Willingness of subjects with thought disorder to participate in research. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 159-165.
19. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T et al. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1689-1697.
20. Prentice KJ, Gold JM, Carpenter WT. Optimistic bias in the perception of personal risk: Patterns in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 507-512.
21. Luce JM. California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1024-1025.
22. Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Croft JR et al. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 78: 275-281.
23. Vellinga A, Smit H, Van Leeuwen E et al. Decision-making capacity of elderly patients assessed through the vignette method: Imagination or reality? Aging Mental Health 2005; 9: 40-48.