Influence of mood state on capacity to consent to research in patients with bipolar disorder

Bipolar Disorders

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 303-309

  Misra, Sahana ^a,b   Socherman, Robert ^a,b   Park, Byung S ^b   Hauser, Peter ^a,b   Ganzini, Linda ^a,b  

^a PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bipolar disorder; Clinical trials; Decision making capacity

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANIA; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

AFFECT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIPOLAR DISORDER; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 43149106183     PISSN: 13985647     EISSN: 13995618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00525.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Roberts LW. The ethical basis of psychiatric research: Conceptual issues and empirical findings. Compr Psychiatry 1998; 39: 99-110.
2. Elliot C. Caring about risks: Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54: 113-116.
3. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study I, II, III. Law Hum Behav 1995; 19: 105-174.
4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh HR. 'Mini-Mental State'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.
5. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 (Suppl. 20): 22-33.
6. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6: 278-296.
7. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 429-435.
8. Carpenter WT, Gold JM, Lahti AC et al. Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 533-538.
9. Stiles PG, Poythress NG, Hall A, Falkenbach D, Williams R. Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 780-785.
10. Dunn LB, Lindamer LA, Palmer BW, Golshan S, Schneiderman LJ, Jeste DV. Improved understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 10: 142-150.
11. Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M. Understanding of placebo controls among older people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 137-146.
12. Stroup S, Appelbaum P, Swartz M et al. Decision-making capacity for research participation among individuals in the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophr Res 2005; 80: 1-8.
13. Howe V, Foister K, Jenkins K, Skene L, Copolov D, Keks N. Competence to give informed consent in acute psychosis is associated with symptoms rather than diagnosis. Schizophr Res 2005; 77: 211-214.
14. Martinez-Aran A, Vieta E, Reinares M et al. Cognitive function across manic or hypomanic, depressed, and euthymic states in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 262-270.
15. Kim SY, Caine ED, Currier GW, Leibovici A, Ryan JM. Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer's disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 712-717.
16. Kim SY. When does decisional impairment become decisional incompetence? Ethical and methodological issues in capacity research in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 92-97.