Race and redistricting: What the print media conveys to the public about the role of race

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 619-637

  Ergun, Damla ^a   Deason, Grace ^a   Borgida, Eugene ^a   Charles, Guy Uriel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RIGHTS; LEGISLATION; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; RACE; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

LEXIS;

EID: 48949096571     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00580.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aleinikoff, T. A., & Issacharoff, S. (1993). Race and redistricting: Drawing constitutional lines after Shaw v. Reno. Michigan Law Review, 92, 588-651.
2. Brown v. Board of Education 50th anniversary: Race and representation (accessed June 24, 2007). Constitutional Rights Foundation. Available at http://www.crf-usa.org/brown50th/race_representation.htm.
3. Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996).
4. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., & Sincharoen, S. (2006). Understanding affirmative action. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 585-611.
5. Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing. Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658.
6. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
7. Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).
8. Fuentes-Rohwer, L., & Charles, G. E. (2006). Preclearance, discrimination, and the Department of Justice. South Carolina Law Review, 57, 827-858.
9. Gentkow, & Shapiro (2006). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 947640.
10. Hutchings, V. L., McClerking, H. K., & Charles, G. (2004). Congressional representation of black interests: Recognizing the importance of stability. Journal of Politics, 66, 450-468.
11. Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 383-408.
12. Issacharoff, S. (2002). Gerrymandering and political cartels. Harvard Law Review, 116, 593-648.
13. Markus, H. R., Uchida, Y., Omoregie, H., Townsend, S. S. M., & Kitayama, S. (2006). Going for the gold: Models of agency in Japanese and American contexts. Psychological Science, 17, 103-112.
14. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995).
16. Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980).
17. Pildes, R. H., & Niemi, R. G. (1993). Expressive harms, "bizarre districts,"and voting rights: Evaluating election-district appearances after Shaw v. Reno (Symposium: The future of voting rights after Shaw v. Reno). Michigan Law Review, 92, 483-587.
18. Powers, D. A., & Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. New York: Academic Press.
19. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 (1964).
20. Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996).
21. Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993).
22. Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 50-51 (1986).
23. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section. (n.d.). Introduction to federal voting rights laws: Voting Rights Act. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/intro/ intro_b.htm
24. Westberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 6 (1964).