Quadratic form: A robust metric for quantitative comparison of flow cytometric histograms

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 73, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 715-726

  Bernas, Tytus ^a,b   Asem, Elikplimi K ^b   Robinson, J Paul ^b   Rajwa, Bartek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Distance metric; Flow cytometry; Histogram comparison; Quadratic form; Statistics

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHINESE CABBAGE; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA CONTENT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KOLMOGOROV SMIRNOV TEST; LYMPHOCYTE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PLANT CELL; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRATIC FORM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANTIGENS, CD45; BRASSICA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; LYMPHOCYTES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PLANT LEAVES; PLOIDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 48849104802     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20586     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Young IT. Proof without prejudice - Use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. J Histochem Cytochem 1977;25:935-941.
2. Bagwell B. A journey through flow cytometric immunofluorescence analyses - Finding accurate and robust algorithms that estimate positive fraction distributions. Clin Immunol Newslett 1996;16:33-37.
3. Finch PD. Substantive difference and the analysis of histograms from very large samples. J Histochem Cytochem 1979;27:800.
4. Huang S, Yeo AA, Li SD. Modification of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for DNA content data analysis through distribution alignment. Assay Drug Develop Technol 2007;5:663-671.
5. Brescia F, Sarti M. Modification to the Lampariello approach to evaluate reactive oxygen species production by flow cytometry. Cytometry A 2008;73A:175-179.
6. Van Bockstaele F, Janssens A, Piette A, Callewaert F, Pede V, Offner F, Verhasseh B, Philippe J. Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test for analysis of ZAP-70 expression in B-CLL, compared with quantitative PCR and IgVH mutation status. Cytometry B 2006;70B:302-308.
7. Cox C, Reeder JE, Robinson RD, Suppes SB, Wheeless LL. Comparison of frequency distributions in flow cytometry. Cytometry 1988;9:291-298.
8. Roederer M, Treister A, Moore W, Herzenberg LA. Probability binning comparison: A metric for quantitating univariate distribution differences. Cytometry 2001;45:37-46.
9. Vives-Rego J, Resina O, Comas J, Loren G, Julia O. Statistical analysis and biological interpretation of the flow cytometric heterogeneity observed in bacterial axenic cultures. J Microbiol Methods 2003;53:43-50.
10. Watson JV. Flow Cytometry Data Analysis. Basic Concepts and Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
11. Roederer M, Moore W, Treister A, Hardy RR, Herzenberg LA. Probability binning comparison: A metric for quantitating multivariate distribution differences. Cytometry 2001;45:47-55.
12. Baggerly KA. Probability binning and testing agreement between multivariate immunofluorescence histograms: Extending the chi-squared test. Cytometry 2001;45:141-150.
13. Brunelli R, Mich O. Histograms analysis for image retrieval. Pattern Recogn 2001;34:1625-1637.
14. Desealers T, Keysers D, Ney H. Features for image retrieval: An experimental comparison. Image Retrieval 2008;11:77-107.
15. Lee SM, Xin JH, Westland S. Evaluation of image similarity by histogram intersection. Col Res Appl 2005;30:265-274.
16. Khalid MS, Malik MB, Ilyas MU, Sarfaraz MS, Mahmood K. Performance of a similarity measure in grayscale image matching. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies, Islamabad, IEEE, 2005.
17. Rubner Y, Puzicha J, Tomasi C, Buhmann JM. Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and texture. Comput Vision Image Understanding 2001;84:25-43.
18. Rubner Y, Tomasi C, Guibas LJ. The Earth Mover's Distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int J Comput Vision 2000;40:99-121.
19. Steinwolf A, Rizzi SA. Non-Gaussian analysis of turbulent boundary layer fluctuating pressure on aircraft skin panels. J Aircraft 2006;43:1662-1675.
20. Winterstein SR. Nonlinear vibration models for extremes and fatigue. J Eng Mech-Asce 1988;114:1772-1790.
21. Hajdera I, Siwinska D, Hasterok R, Maluszynska J. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of genome structure in Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus cosentinii. Theor Appl Genet 2003;107:988-996.
22. Lampariello F. On the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test for immunofluorescence histogram comparison. Cytometry 2000;39:179-188.
23. Bigos M, Baumgarth N, Jager GC, Herman OC, Nozaki T, Stovel RT, Parks DR, Herzenberg LA. Nine color eleven parameter immunophenotyping using three laser flow cytometry. Cytometry 1999;36:36-45.
24. Brown M, Wittwer C. Flow cytometry: Principles and clinical applications in hematology. Clin Chem 2000;46:1221-1229.
25. Tung JW, Parks DR, Moore WA, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. New approaches to fluorescence compensation and visualization of FACS data. Clin Immunol 2004;110:277-283.
26. Overton WR. Modified histogram subtraction technique for analysis of flow-cytometry data. Cytometry 1988;9:619-626.
27. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics, Part 1: The P value fallacy. Ann Int Med 1999;130:995-1004.
28. Goodman SN. A comment on replication, P-values and evidence. Stat Med 1992;11:875-879.
29. Parkhurst DF. Statistical significance tests: Equivalence and reverse tests should reduce misinterpretation. Bioscience 2001;51:1051-1057.