Revenue equivalence revisited

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 171-192

  Ivanova Stenzel, Radosveta ^a   Salmon, Timothy C ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ascending auctions; Bidder preferences; Endogenous entry; Private values; Sealed bid auctions

Indexed keywords

EID: 48649091628     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: 10902473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2008.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bajari P., and Hortacsu A. Winner's curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econ. 3 2 (2003) 329-355
2. Coppinger V., Smith V.L., and Titus J. Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch and sealed-bid auctions. Econ. Inquiry 18 (1980) 1-20
3. Cox J.C., Roberson B., and Smith V.L. Theory and behavior of single object auctions. Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (1982), JAI Press 1-43
4. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. Optimal auctions revisited. Games Econ. Behav. 5 (1993) 227-239
5. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., and Katok E. Experiments on auction valuation and endogenous entry. In: Morgan J. (Ed). Experimental and Behavior Economics, Advances in Applied Microeconomics, vol. 13 (2005), Elsevier 171-196
6. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., and Katok E. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econ. Theory 33 1 (2007) 81-101
7. Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Exper. Econ. 10 2 (2007) 171-178
8. Goeree, J.K., Offerman, T., 2002. First-price auctions to sell heterogeneous licenses. Working paper, CREED
9. Güth W., Ivanova-Stenzel R., Knigstein M., and Strobel M. Bid functions in auctions and fair division games: Experimental evidence. German Econ. Rev. 3 4 (2002) 461-484
10. Ivanova-Stenzel R., and Salmon T.C. Bidder preferences among auction institutions. Econ. Inquiry 42 (2004) 223-236
11. Ivanova-Stenzel R., and Salmon T.C. Entry fees and endogenous entry in electronic auctions. Electronic Markets 14 3 (2004) 170-177
12. Ivanova-Stenzel, R., Salmon, T.C., in press. Robustness of bidder preferences among auction institutions. Econ. Inquiry, doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.0011.x
13. Kagel J.H. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In: Kagel J.H., and Roth A.E. (Eds). The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ 501-586
14. Kagel J.H., and Levin D. Independent private-value auctions: Bidder behavior in first-, second- and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econ. J. 103 (1993) 868-879
15. Kagel J.H., Harstad R.M., and Levin D. Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica 55 6 (1987) 1275-1304
16. Kirkchamp, O., Poen, E., Reiss, J.P., 2005. Outside options: Another reason to choose the first-price auction. Working paper, University of Madgebourg
17. Klemperer P. What really matters in auction design. J. Econ. Perspect. 16 1 (2002) 169-190
18. Krishna V. Auction theory (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
19. Levin D., and Smith J.L. Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Amer. Econ. Rev. 84 3 (1994) 585-599
20. Lucking-Reiley, D., 1999a. Experimental evidence on the endogenous entry of bidders in Internet auctions. Working paper, University of Arizona
21. Lucking-Reiley D. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econ. Rev. 89 5 (1999) 1063-1080
22. Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned and how?. J. Ind. Econ. 48 3 (2000) 227-252
23. Matthews S. Comparing auctions for risk averse buyers: A buyer's point of view. Econometrica 55 3 (1987) 633-646
24. Meyer D.J., Van Huyck J.B., Battalio R.C., and Saving T.R. History's role in coordinating decentralized allocation decisions. J. Polit. Economy 100 2 (1992) 292-316
25. Myerson R.B. Optimal auction design. Math. Operations Res. 6 (1981) 58-73
26. Ochs J. The coordination problem in decentralized markets: An experiment. Quart. J. Econ. 105 (1990) 549-559
27. Ockenfels, A., Reiley, D., Sadrieh, A., 2006. Online auctions. Working paper 12785, NBER
28. Palfrey, T.R., Pevnitskaya, S., in press. Endogenous entry and self-selection in private value auctions: An experimental study. J. Econ. Behav. Organ, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.005
29. Pevnitskaya, S., 2004. Endogenous entry in first-price private value auctions: The self-selection effect. Working paper
30. Riley J.G., and Samuelson W.F. Optimal auctions. Amer. Econ. Rev. 71 (1981) 381-392
31. Smith J.L., and Levin D. Ranking auctions with risk averse bidders. J. Econ. Theory 68 (1996) 549-561
32. Smith J.L., and Levin D. Entry coordination in auctions and social welfare: An experimental investigation. Int. J. Game Theory 30 3 (2002) 321-350
33. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 41 (1961) 8-37