Robustness of bidder preferences among auction institutions

Economic Inquiry

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 355-368

  Ivanova Stenzel, Radosveta ^a   Salmon, Timothy C ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51149115551     PISSN: 00952583     EISSN: 14657295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00111.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cox, J. C., B. Roberson, and V. L. Smith. "Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions," in Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 2, edited by R. M. Isaac. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press Inc., 1982, 1 43.
2. Cox, J. C., V. L. Smith, and J. M. Walker. "Theory and Individual Behavior of First Price Auctions." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 1988, 61 99.
3. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. "Optimal Auctions Revisited." Games and Economic Behavior, 5, 1993, 227 39.
4. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., and E. Katok. "Regret in Auctions: Theory and Evidence." Economic Theory, 31, 2007, 81 101.
5. Fischbacher, U. "z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments." Experimental Economics, 10, 2007, 171 8.
6. Harrison, G. W. "Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions." American Economic Review, 79, 1989, 749 62.
7. Harstad, R. M. "Alternative Common Values Auction Procedures: Revenue Comparisons with Free Entry." Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1990, 421 9.
8. Harstad, R. M. "Dominant Strategy Adoption and Bidders' Experience with Pricing Rules." Experimental Economics, 3, 2000, 261 80.
9. Isaac, R. M., and D. James. "Just Who Are You Calling Risk Averse." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20, 2000, 177 87.
10. Isaac, R., T. C. Salmon, and A. Zillante. "Experimental Tests of Alternative Models of Bidding in Ascending Auctions." International Journal of Game Theory, 33, 2005, 287 313.
11. Ivanova-Stenzel, R., and T. C. Salmon. "Bidder Preferences Among Auction Institutions." Economic Inquiry, 42, 2004a, 223 36.
12. Ivanova-Stenzel, R., and T. C. Salmon. "Entry Fees and Endogenous Entry in Electronic Auctions." Electronic Markets, 14, 2004b, 170 77.
13. Ivanova-Stenzel, R., and T. C. Salmon. "Revenue Equivalence Revisited." SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper 175, 2006.
14. Kagel, J. H. "Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research," in The Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1995, 501 86.
15. Kagel, J. H., and D. Levin. "Independent Private-Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior in First-, Second- and Third-Price Auctions with Varying Numbers of Bidders." The Economic Journal, 103, 1993, 868 79.
16. Levin, D., and J. L. Smith. "Equilibrium in Auctions with Entry." American Economic Review, 84, 1994, 585 99.
17. Lucking-Reiley, D. "Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence between Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet." American Economic Review, 89, 1999, 1063 80.
18. Matthews, S. "Comparing Auctions For Risk Averse Buyers: A Buyer's Point of View." Econometrica, 55, 1987, 633 46.
19. McAfee, P. "Mechanism Design by Competing Sellers." Econometrica, 61, 1993, 1281 312.
20. McAfee, P., and J. McMillan. "Auctions with Entry." Economics Letters, 23, 1987, 343 7.
21. Palfrey, T. R., and S. Pevnitskaya. "Endogenous Entry and Self-selection in Private Value Auctions: An Experimental Study." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2008. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.005.
22. Pevnitskaya, S. "Endogenous Entry in First-Price Private Value Auctions: the Self-Selection Effect." Working Paper, 2004.
23. Rabin, M. "Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem." Econometrica, 68, 2000, 1281 92.
24. Rabin, M., and R. H. Thaler. "Risk Aversion." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 2001, 219 32.
25. Shachat, J., and J. T. Swarthout. "Procurement Auctions for Differentiated Goods." Working Paper, IBM Research Labs, 2002.