Evaluating local coastal zone land use planning capacities in California

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 544-555

  Tang, Zhenghong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ENGINEERING; COASTAL ZONES; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD PROCESSING; PLANNING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; COASTAL COMMUNITIES; COASTAL MANAGEMENT; COASTAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITIES; LAND USE PLANNING (LUP); LOCAL DEVELOPMENT; MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; REGRESSION (R2);

LAND USE;

COASTAL PROTECTION; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 48349113989     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Davis B.C. Regional planning in the US coastal zone: a comparative analysis of 15 special area plans. Ocean & Coastal Management 47 1-2 (2004) 79-94
2. Burby R.J. Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters?. Natural Hazards Review 6 2 (2005) 67-81
3. Allmendinger P., Barker A., and Stead S. delivering integrated coastal-zone management through land-use planning. Planning Practice and Research 17 2 (2002) 175-196
4. Kay R., and Alder J. Coastal planning and management (1999), EF&N Spoon, London p. 1-380
5. Wescott G. The theory and practice of coastal area planning: linking strategic planning to local communities. Coastal Management 32 1 (2004) 95-100
6. Archer J.H., and Knecht R.W. The U.S. national coastal zone management program-problems and opportunities in the next phase. Coastal Management 15 2 (1987) 103-120
7. Brown A.L., and Therivel R. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 3 (2000) 183-189
8. Godschalk D.R. Implementing coastal zone management: 1972-1990. Coastal Management 20 (1992) 93-116
9. Bernd-Cohen T., and Gordon M. State coastal program effectiveness in protecting natural beaches, dunes, bluffs, and rocky shores. Coastal Management 27 2-3 (1999) 187-217
10. Good J.W., Weber J.W., and Charland J.W. Protecting estuaries and coastal wetlands through state coastal management programs. Coastal Management 27 2-3 (1999) 139-186
11. Pogue P., and Lee V. Providing public access to the shore: the role of coastal zone management programs. Coastal Management 27 2-3 (1999) 219-237
12. Goodwin R.F. Redeveloping deteriorated urban waterfronts: the effectiveness of U.S. coastal management programs. Coastal Management 27 2/3 (1999) 239-269
13. Hershman M.J. Seaport development and coastal management programs: a national overview. Coastal Management 27 2-3 (1999) 271-290
14. Knecht R.W., Cicin-Sain B., and Fisk G.W. Perceptions of the performance of state coastal zone management programs in the United States. II. Regional and state comparisons. Coastal Management 25 3 (1997) 325-343
15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA discussion paper: current and future challenges for coastal management (2006). p. 2-38 (visited on July 10, 2007)
16. Berke P.R., and French S.P. The influence of state planning mandates on local-plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13 (1994) 237-250
17. Kaiser E.J., and Godschalk D.R. 20th-century land-use planning - A stalwart family tree. Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (1995) 365-385
18. Brody S.D. Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local comprehensive land use planning. Population and Environment 24 (2003) 511-540
19. Brody S.D. Examining the role of resource-based industries in ecosystem approaches to management: an evaluation of comprehensive plans in Florida. Society and Natural Resources 16 (2003) 625-641
20. Brody S.D. Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (2003) 191-201
21. Brody S.D. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2003) 407-419
22. Nelson A.C., and French S.P. Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: a case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 2 (2002) 194-207
23. Norton R.K. Local commitment to state-mandated planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 2 (2005) 149-171
24. Pollnac R.B., and Pomeroy R.S. Factors influencing the sustainability of integrated coastal management projects in the Philippines and Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management 48 (2005) 233-251
25. Olshansky R.B. Land use planning for seismic safety: the Los Angeles County experience, 1971-1994. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 2 (2001) 173-185
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). report to congress on national coastal management performance measurement system (2006). p. 1-48 (visited on July 10, 2007)
27. Vellinga P., and Klein R.J.T. Climate-change, sea-level rise and integrated coastal zone management - an ipcc approach. Ocean & Coastal Management 21 1-3 (1993) 245-268
28. Olshansky R.B., and Kartez J.D. Managing land use to build resilience. In: Burby R.J. (Ed). Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with comprehensive land use planning for sustainable communities (1998), Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC 167-202
29. Brody S.D., Highfield W., and Carrasco V. Measuring the collaborative planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004) 33-50
30. Kartez J.D., and Lindell M.K. Planning for uncertainty: the case of local disaster planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 4 (1987) 487-489
31. Lindell M.K., and Meier M.J. Effectiveness of community planning for toxic chemical emergencies. Journal of the American Planning Association 60 (1994) 222-234
32. Vanderhaegen M., and Muro E. Contribution of a European spatial data infrastructure to the effectiveness of EIA and SEA studies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 2 (2005) 123-142
33. Scott D., and Willits F.K. Environmental attitudes and behavior. Environmental Behavior 26 2 (1994) 239-261
34. Van Liere K.D., and Dunlap R.E. Environmental concern - does it make a difference how it's measured?. Environmental Behavior 13 (1981) 651-676
35. Guagano G.A., and Markee N. Regional differences in the sociodemographic determinants of environmental concern. Population and Environment 17 2 (1995) 135-149
36. California Office of Planning and Research. Governor's environmental goals and policy report. Governor's office of planning and research (2003), California Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento p. 20-40
37. Lee E.M. The political ecology of coastal planning and management in England and Wales - policy responses to the implications of sea-level rise. Geographical Journal 159 (1993) 169-178
38. Godschalk D.R., Brody S.D., and Burry R. Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: challenges for comprehensive planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 5 (2003) 733-754
39. Healey P. A planners day - knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1992) 9-20
40. Fischer T.B. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 (2003) 155-170
41. Altshuler A. The goals of comprehensive planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 (1965) 186-195