Regional planning in the US coastal zone: A comparative analysis of 15 special area plans

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 47, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 79-94

  Davis, Braxton C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MANAGEMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING;

COASTAL MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING;

COASTAL ENGINEERING;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING METHOD; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2442451413     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Davis B.C. Inventory, classification and analysis of special management areas associated with US coastal programs. Coastal Management. 31(4):2003;339-354
2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Coastal Zone Enhancement Program - Special Area Management Plans Accomplishment Report, NOS/OCRM/CPD 99-12, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 1999.
3. Imperial M.T. Analyzing institutional arrangements for ecosystem-based management. lessons from the Rhode Island Salt Ponds SAM plan Coastal Management. 27:1999;31-56
4. Ernst L.M. Integrating state government for improved coastal water quality. analysis of the Rhode Island salt pond region Coastal Management. 23:1995;315-326
5. So F.S., Hand I., McDowell B.D. The practice of state and regional planning. 1986;American Planning Association, Chicago
6. Porter D. Managing growth in America's communities. 1997;Island Press, Washington, DC
7. Daniels T. When city and country collide. managing growth in the metropolitan fringe:1999;Island Press, Washington, DC
8. LeGates R.T., Miller T. The region is the frontier. frameworks, goals, and mechanisms for collaborative regional decision-making in twenty-first century California:2001;Center for California Studies, Sacremento
9. Wheeler S. The new regionalism. key characteristics of an emerging movement Journal of the American Planning Association. 68(3):2002;267-278
10. Congressional research service. Legislative history of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1976.
11. Eichenberg T., Archer J. The federal consistency doctrine. coastal zone management and new federalism Ecology Law Quarterly. 14:1987;9-68
12. Davis B.C. Judicial interpretations of federal consistency under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Coastal Management. 29(4):2001;341-352
13. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM). Section 309 Programmatic Objectives. [Online] http://www.ocrm.nos.noaa.gov/pdf/ 309fnlquestions_00.pdf, February 11, 2003.
14. Beatley T., Brower D.J., Schwab A.K. An introduction to coastal zone management. 2nd ed:2002;Island Press, Washington, DC
15. Kay R., Alder J. Coastal planning and management. 1999;Routledge, London
16. Colt A.B. Developing criteria for evaluating integrated estuarine management plans. Ocean and Coastal Management. 24:1994;85-108
17. Imperial M.T., Hennessey T.M. An ecosystem-based approach to managing estuaries. an assessment of the national estuary program Coastal Management. 24:1996;115-139
18. Tuler S., Webler T., Shockey I., Stern P.C. Factors influencing the participation of local governmental officials in the National Estuary Program. Coastal Management. 30(1):2002;101-120
19. Berke P.R., Conroy M.M. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association. 66(1):2000;21-33
20. Berke P.R., Roenigk D.J., Kaiser E.J., Burby R.J. Enhancing plan quality. evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 39(1):1996;79-96
21. Burby RJ, Dalton LC. State planning mandates and coastal management. In: Proceedings of the Coastal Zone '93 Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1993. p. 1069-83.
22. Beach D. Coastal sprawl. the effects of urban design on aquatic ecosystems in the United States:2002;Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, VA
23. Dugan P. Conflict and coastal management. Galloway T.D. The newest federalism. a new framework for coastal issues:1982;137-143 Wilson Publishing Co. Wakefield, RI
24. John Heinz H. III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment (Heinz Center). The Coastal Zone Management Act. developing a framework for identifying performance indicators:2003;Heinz Center, Washington, DC
25. Brumbaugh R. Watershed study impediments: field regulatory survey discussion paper, IWR Report 97-PS-2, Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA, 1997.
26. Good BN. Regulating wetlands by Special Area Management Planning. In: Proceedings of the Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife Symposium, Charleston, SC, 1989. p. 873-75.
27. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Regulatory Guidance Letter 92-03, Special Area Management Plans (SAMPs). United States Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 1992.
28. Kusler J.A. Regulating sensitive lands. 1980;Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC
29. Tuohy W.S. Neglect of market incentives in local environmental planning. a case study in the national estuary program Coastal Management. 22:1994;81-95