An experimental and theoretical analysis of turbulence promoter assisted ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 659-667

  Pal, Srimanta ^a   Bharihoke, Ravi ^a   Chakraborty, Sudipto ^a   Ghatak, Sobhendu Kumar ^a   De, Sirshendu ^a   DasGupta, Sunando ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Deposition thickness; Fruit juice; Turbulence promoters; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; BEVERAGES; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; FLUXES; FRUIT JUICES; POLYSACCHARIDES; SUGAR (SUCROSE); ULTRAFILTRATION;

CALCULATED VALUES; CROSS FLOWS; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FLUID FLOWING; MASS TRANSFER PROCESSES; MEMBRANE SURFACES; MESH SIZES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUT-OFF (MWCO); OPERATING CONDITIONS; PERMEATE FLUXES; TRANS-MEMBRANE PRESSURE (TMP); ULTRAFILTRATION (UF) MEMBRANES; VIDEO MICROSCOPY (VM);

FRUITS;

EID: 48349093009     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Schwinge J., Wiley D.E., and Fane A.G. Nobel spacer design improves observed flux. J. Membr. Sci. 229 (2004) 53-61
2. Auddy K., De S., and DasGupta S. Performance prediction of turbulent promoter enhanced nanofiltration of a dye solution. Sep. Purif. Technol. 43 (2005) 85-94
3. Finnigan S.M., and Howell J.A. The effect of pulsed flow on ultrafiltration fluxes in a baffled tubular membrane system. Desalination 79 (1990) 181-201
4. Cui Z.F., and Wright K.I.T. Flux enhancement with gas sparging in downward cross flow ultrafiltration: performance and mechanism. J. Membr. Sci. 117 (1996) 109-116
5. Mullon C., Radovich J.M., and Behnam B. A semiempirical model for electro-ultrafiltration-diafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 20 1 (1985) 63
6. Mameri N., Oussedik S.M., Khelifa A., Belhocine D., Gharib H., and Lounici H. Electric field applied in the ultrafiltration process. Desalination 138 (2001) 291
7. Wavhal D.S., and Fisher E.R. Membrane surface modification by plasma-induced polymerization of acrylamide for improved surface properties and reduced protein fouling. Langmuir 19 (2003) 79-85
8. 2 plasma treatment. Desalination 172 (2005) 189-205
9. Favia P., Lopez L.C., Sardella E., Gristina R., Nardulli M., and d'Agostino R. Low temperature plasma processes for biomedical applications and membrane processing. Desalination 199 (2006) 268-270
10. Kavitskaya A.A. Separation characteristics of charged ultrafiltration membranes modified with the anionic surfactant. Desalination 184 (2005) 409-414
11. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
12. Hadzismajlovic D.E., and Bertram C.D. Flux enhancement in turbulence crossflow microfiltration of yeast using a collapsible-tube pulsation generator. J. Membr. Sci. 163 (1999) 123-134
13. Mercier M., Fonade C., and Lafforgue-Delorme C. How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux in mineral tubular membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 103-113
14. Chang S., Fane A.G., and Vigneswaran S. Experimental assessment of filtration of biomass with transverse and axial fibres. Chem. Eng. J. 87 (2002) 121-127
15. Scot K., and Lobato J. Mass transfer characteristics of cross-corrugated membranes. Desalination 146 (2002) 255-258
16. Ghaffour N., Jassim R., and Khir T. Flux enhancement by using helical baffles in ultrafiltration of suspended solids. Desalination 167 (2004) 201-207
17. Gupta B.B., Howell J.A., Wu D., and Field R.W. A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 102 (1995) 31-42
18. Bellhouse B.J., Costigan G., Abhinava K., and Merry A. The performance of helical screw - thread inserts in tubular membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 89-113
19. Krstic D.M., Tekic M.N., Caric M.{Eth}., and Milanovic S.D. Static turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Desalination 163 (2004) 297-309
20. Krstic D.M., Korisb A.K., and Tekica M.N. Do static turbulence promoters have potential in cross-flow membrane filtration applications. Desalination 191 (2006) 371-375
21. DaCosta A.R., Fane A.G., and Wiley D.E. Net-Type spacers: effect of configuration on fluid flow path and ultrafiltration flux. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 1845-1851
22. Poyen S., Quemeneur F., and Bariou B. Improvement of the flux of permeate in ultrafiltration by turbulence promoters. Int. Chem. Eng. 27 (1987) 441-447
23. Schwinge J., Wiley D.E., Fane A.G., and Guenther R. Characterization of zigzag spacer for ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 172 (2000) 19-31
24. Subramani A., Kim S., and Hoek E.M.V. Pressure, flow and concentration profiles in open and spacer-filled membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 277 (2006) 7-17
25. Kirk D.E., Montgomery M.W., and Kortekaas M.G. Clarification of pear juice by hollow fiber ultrafiltration. J. Food Sci. 48 (1983) 1663-1666
26. Capannelli G., Bottino A., Munari S., Lister D.G., Maschio G., and Becchi I. The use of membrane processes in the clarification of orange and lemon juices. J. Food Eng. 21 (1994) 473-483
27. Uttapap D.J., and Tangamornsuksun C. Self-forming dynamic membrane for ultrafiltration of pineapple juice. J. Membr. Sci. 129 (1997) 135-143
28. Thakur B.R., Singh R.K., and Handa A.K. Chemistry and uses of pectin: critical reviews. Food Sci. Nutr. 3 (1997) 47-73
29. Sahin S., and Bayindirli L. The effect of depectinization and clarification on the filtration of sour cherry juice. J. Food Eng. 19 (1993) 237-245
30. Rai P., Majumdar G.C., DasGupta S., and De S. Quantification of flux decline of depectinized mosambi [Citrus sinensis (L) Osbeck] juice using unstirred batch ultrafiltration. J. Food Process Eng. 28 (2005) 359-377
31. Ouazzani K., and Bentama J. A promising optical technique to measure cake thickness of biological particles during a filtration process. Desalination 206 (2007) 36-41
32. Wiley D.E., and Fletcher D.F. Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modeling of flow in membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 211 (2003) 127-137
33. Buffat M. 2D and 3D simulations of the periodic flow around a cylinder between two walls. Parallel Computation Fluid Dynamics: Implementations and Results (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge pp. 257-263
34. Madireddi K., Babcock R.B., Levine B., and Kim M.K. An unsteady-state model to predict concentration polarization in commercial spiral wound membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 157 (1999) 13-34
35. Rosen C., and Tragardh C. Computer simulations of mass transfer in the concentration boundary layer over ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 85 (1993) 139-156
36. Pellerin E., Michelistsch E., Darcovich K., Lin S., and Tam C.M. Turbulence transport in membrane modules by CFD simulation in two dimension. J. Membr. Sci. 100 (1995) 139-153
37. Cao Z., Wiley D.E., and Fane A.G. CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel. J. Membr. Sci. 185 (2001) 157-176
38. Li F., Meindersma G.W., de Haan A.B., and Reith T. Optimization of non-woven spacers by CFD and validation by experiments. Desalination 146 (2002) 209-212
39. Li F., Meindersma G.W., de Haan A.B., and Reith T. Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 289-302
40. Geraldes V., Semiao V., and de Pinho N.M. Hydrodynamics and concentration polarization in a NF spiral-wound modules with ladder-type spacers. Desalination 157 (2003) 395-402
41. Pozrikidis C. Boundary conditions for shear flow past a permeable interface modeled as an array cylinder. Comput. Fluids 33 (2004) 1-17
42. Gimmelshtein M.M., and Semiat R. Investigation of flow next to membrane walls. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 137-150
43. Pal S., Ghosh A., Ghosh T.B., De S., and DasGupta S. Optical quantification of fouling during nanofiltration of dyes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 52 (2006) 372-379
44. Sarkar B., Pal S., Ghosh T.B., De S., and DasGupta S. A study of electric field enhanced ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and optical quantification of gel deposition. J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 112-120
45. Sarkar B., DasGupta S., and De S. Effect of electric field during gel layer controlled ultrafiltration of synthetic and fruit juice. J. Membr. Sci. 307 (2008) 268-276
46. van den Berg G.B., Rácz I.G., and Smolders C.A. Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 47 (1989) 25-51
47. De S., and Bhattacharya P.K. Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 119-131
48. Geraldes V., and Afonso M.D. Generalized mass-transfer correction factor for nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. AIChE J. 52 10 (2006) 3353-3362
49. S. Pal, Swati, T.B. Ghosh, S. De, S. DasGupta, Optical evaluation of deposition thickness and measurement of permeate flux enhancement of simulated fruit juice in presence of turbulence promoters, J. Membr. Sci., in press, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.029.