Below the tip of the iceberg: The co-evolution of formal and informal interorganizational relations in the wireless telecommunications industry

Managerial and Decision Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 425-441

  Rosenkopf, Lori ^a   Schleicher, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b TNS Infratest   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349087533     PISSN: 01436570     EISSN: 10991468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1403     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Afuah A. 2000. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal 21: 387-404.
2. Ahuja G. 2000a. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 425-455.
3. Ahuja G. 2000b. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 317-343.
4. Ahuja G. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal 22(6-7): 521-543.
5. Burt RS. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation. Academic Press: New York.
6. Davis GF. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 583-613.
7. Davis GF, Greve HR. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 1-37.
8. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7(2): 136-150.
9. Freeman LC. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.
10. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A. 1995. Technological and organizational designs to achieve economics of sub-stitutions. Strategic Management Journal 16: 93-110.
11. Gulati R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1995): 619-652.
12. Gulati R. 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20(5): 397-420.
13. Gulati R, Gargiulo M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1439-1493.
14. Gulati R, Westphal JD. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of ceo-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 473-506.
15. Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. 1994. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal 15(4): 291-309.
16. Haunschild PR. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 564-592.
17. Haunschild PR, Beckman CM. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(4): 815-844.
18. Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-r&d relationship. Economé trica 52: 909-938.
19. Kogut B. 1988. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review Special Issue 28: 39-52.
20. Mintz B, Schwartz M. 1981. Interlocking directorates and interest group formation. American Sociological Review 46(6): 851-869.
21. Mizruchi MS. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 271-298.
22. Mizruchi MS, Stearns LB. 1988. A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 194-210.
23. Mowery D, Oxley JE, Silverman BE. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17: 77-91.
24. Ocasio W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 18(Summer Special Issue): 187-206.
25. Pennings JM. 1980. Interlocking Directorates. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
26. Podolny JM. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 829-872
27. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145.
28. Powell WW, White D, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J. 2002. Practicing polygamy with good taste: the evolution of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Working Paper, Stanford University.
29. Rosenkopf L, Metiu A, George VP. 2001. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 748-772.
30. Rosenkopf L, Tushman ML. 1998. The coevolution of community networks and technology: lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 7: 311-346.
31. Stuart TE. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 668-698.
32. Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L. 1992. Organizational determinants of technological change: towards a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organization Behavior 14: 311-347.
33. Useem M. 1984. The Inner Circle. Oxford University Press: New York.
34. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science 8(2): 109-125.