New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues

Program

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 243-261

  Merčun, Tanja ^a   Žumer, Maja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Catalogues; Communication technologies; Information retrieval; Libraries; Online catalogues

Indexed keywords

EID: 48249144022     PISSN: 00330337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00330330810892668     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abram, S. (2005), "Web 2.0 - huh? Library 2.0, librarian 2.0", Information Outlook, Vol. 9 No. 12, pp. 44-6.
2. Anderson, P. (2007), "What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education", JISC Technology and Standards Watch, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.
3. Antelman, K., Lynema, E. and Pace, A.K. (2006), "Toward a twenty-first century library catalog", Information Technology in Libraries, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 128-39.
4. Blecic, D.D., Dorsch, J.L., Koenig, M.H. and Bangalore, N.S. (1999), "A longitudinal study of the effects of OPAC screen changes on searching behaviour and searcher success", College & Research Libraries, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 515-30.
5. Borgman, C.L. (1996a), "Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval studies", Journal of the American Society for the Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 387-400.
6. Borgman, C.L. (1996b), "Why are online catalogs still hard to use?", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 493-503.
7. Breeding, M. (2006a), "Web services and the service-oriented architecture", Library Technology Reports: Expert Guides to Library Systems and Services, Vol. 43 No. 2, p. 5, available at: https://publications. techsource.ala.org/products/archive.pl?article=2577.
8. Breeding, M. (2006b), "Technology for the next generation", Computers in Libraries, Vol. 26 No. 10, pp. 28-30.
9. Breeding, M. (2007a), "The birth of a new generation of library interfaces", Computers in Libraries, Vol. 27 No. 9, pp. 34-7.
10. Breeding, M. (2007b), "Next generation library catalogs", Library Technology Reports, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 5-14.
11. Calhoun, K. (2006), The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools, final report, Library of Congress, available at: www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf.
12. Coffman, S. (1999), "Building earth's largest library: driving into the future", Searcher, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 34-45.
13. Coyle, K. and Hillmann, D. (2007), "Resource Description and Access (RDA): cataloguing rules for the 20th century", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 Nos. 1/2, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/coyle/01coyle.html.
14. Fast, K.V. and Campbell, D.G. (2004), "I still like Google: university student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web", in Schamber, L. and Barry, C.L. (Eds), Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, pp. 138-46.
15. Fifarek, A. (2007), "The birth of Catalog 2.0: innovative interfaces' Encore Discovery Platform", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 13-15.
16. Gatenby, J. (2006), "Today's information consumer tapping into international library services: making it a reality", NVB/OCN 2006 Conference, Amsterdam, November 7-8, available at: www.oclcpica.org/content/ 1400/pdf/article-informationconsumer-internationallibraryservices.pdf.
17. Hildreth, C.R. (1982), Online Public Access Catalogs: the User Interface, OCLC, Dublin, OH.
18. Hildreth, C.R. (1988), "Online library catalogs as IR systems: what can we learn from research?", in Yates-Mercer, P.A. (Ed.), Future Trends in Information Science and Technology, Proceedings of the Silver Jubilee Conference of the City University's Department of Information Science, Taylor Graham, London, pp. 9-25.
19. Hildreth, C.R. (1995), Online Catalog Design Models: Are We Moving in the Right Direction?, available at: http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/childret/clr-opac. html.
20. Large, A. and Beheshti, J. (1997), "OPACs: a research review", Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 111-33.
21. Maness, J. (2006), "Library 2.0 theory: web 2.0 and its implications for libraries", Webology, Vol. 3 No. 2, available at: www.webology.ir/ 2006/v3n2/a25.html.
22. Markey, K. (1984), Subject Searching in Library Catalogs, OCLC, Dublin, OH.
23. Markey, K. (2007), "The online library catalog: paradise lost and paradise regained?", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 Nos 1/2, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/markey/01markey.html.
24. Merčun, T. (2007), "Online knjižnični katalogi prihodnosti" ("Online library catalogues of the future"), in Ambrožič, M. (Ed.), Knjižnice za prihodnost: napredek in sodelovanje: zbornik referatov (Libraries for the Future: Development and Collaboration: Proceedings), Zveza bibliotekarskih društev Slovenije, Ljubljana, pp. 91-104.
25. Novotny, E. (2004), "I don't think I click: a protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the internet age", College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 6, pp. 525-63.
26. OCLC (2005), Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/reports/ 2005perceptions.htm.
27. OCLC (2007), Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World, OCLC, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/reports/sharing/default.htm.
28. Pattern, D. (2007), "Making the catalogue a good place to be lipstick, cowbells and serendipity, JIBS: is library 2.0 a trivial pursuit?", PowerPoint, available at: http://slideshare.net/daveyp.
29. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2007), Information Searches that Solve Problems, available at: www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/231/reportdisplay.asp.
30. Prensky, M. (2001), "Digital natives, digital immigrants", On The Horizon, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 1-6.
31. Sadeh, T. (2007), "Time for a change: new approaches for the new generation of library users", New Library World, Vol. 108 Nos 7/8, pp. 307-16.
32. Sadeh, T. (2008), "User experience in the library: a case study", New Library World, Vol. 109 Nos 1/2, pp. 7-24.
33. Sweeney, R.T. (2005), "Reinventing library buildings and services for the millennial generation", Library Administration & Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 165-75.
34. Tennant, R. (2005), "Lipstick on a pig", Library Journal, Vol. 130 No. 7, p. 34.
35. University College London (UCL) CIBER Group (2008), Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future, CIBER Briefing Paper 9, UCL, London, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/ggfinalkeynote11012008. pdf.
36. University of California Libraries, Bibliographic Services Task Force (2005), Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California, Final report, December, available at: http://libraries. universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf.
37. Web 2.0 (2008), Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web2.0&oldid=192058191 (accessed 15 January 2008).
38. Wenzler, J. (2007), "LibraryThing and the library catalog: adding collective intelligence to the OPAC", paper presented at a Workshop on Next Generation Libraries, San Francisco State University CARL NITIG, September 7, available at: http://online.sfsu.edu/∼jwenzler/research/LTFL.pdf.
39. Yu, H. and Young, M. (2004), "The impact of web search engines on subject searching in OPAC", Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 168-80.
40. Žumer, M. (2007), "Amazon: competition or complement to OPACs", BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, No. 19, available at: www2.ub.edu/bid/consultaarticulos.php?fichero=19zumer2. htm.