User experience in the library: A case study

New Library World

Volumn 109, Issue , 2008, Pages 7-24

  Sadeh, Tamar ^a  

^a Israel and City University   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Customer satisfaction; Information retrieval; Internet; Libraries; User interfaces

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149071749     PISSN: 03074803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03074800810845976     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akselbo, J.L., Arnfred, L., Barfort, S., Bay, G., Christiansen, T.B., Hansen, J.H., Jensen, H.T., Markussen, G.B. and Morthorst, A.M. (2006), The Hybrid Library: From the Users' Perspective, The National Library and Copenhagen University Library, the Aarhus School of Business Library, the State and University Library, the University Library of Southern Denmark, available at: www.statsbiblioteket.dk/publ/fieldstudies.pdf.
2. Arth, J. (2007), “Primo usability & views: The Minnesota Report” paper presented at the ELUNA Meeting, Spearfish, SD, June.
3. Casey, M. and Savastinuk, L.C. (2006), “Library 2.0: Service for the next-generation library”, Library Journal, Vol. 14, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html.
4. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998), Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report, KG Saur, Munich, available at: www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf.
5. Law, J. (2007), “Understanding student expectations in conducting course research”, paper presented at the Online Northwest Conference, February 16, available at: www.ous.edu/onlinenw/2007/presentations/law.ppt.
6. Mele, S. (2007), A Poll on HEP Information Systems, available at: indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=46&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=11611.
7. OCLC Online Computer Library Center (2005), Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm.
8. OCLC Online Computer Library Center (2006), College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/reports/perceptionscollege.htm.
9. Rosen, D. (2006), Ex Libris PRIMO Usability Evaluations, University of Minnesota Usability Services, Minneapolis, MN.
10. Rosen, D. (2007), Ex Libris PRIMO Round 2 Usability Evaluations Summary Report, University of Minnesota Usability Services, Minneapolis, MN.
11. Sadeh, T. (2006), “Google Scholar versus metasearch systems”, High Energy Physics Libraries Webzine, Vol. 12, available at: library.cern.ch/HEPLW/12/papers/1/.
12. Sadeh, T. (2007), “Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users”, New Library World, Vol. 108 Nos 7 / 8, pp. 307-16, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03074800710763608.
13. Schiessl, M., Duda, S., Thölke, A. and Fischer, R. (2003), “Eye tracking and its application in usability and media research”, MMI interaktiv, Vol. 6, available at: useworld.net/ausgaben/3-2003/MMI-Interaktiv0303_SchiesslDudaThoelkeFischer.pdf.
14. Schnipke, S.K. and Todd, M.W. (2000), “Trials and tribulations of using an eye-tracking system”, Proceedings of CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Archive, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 1-6, pp. 273-274.
15. Tillett, B. (2004), What is FRBR? A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe, Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service, Washington, DC, available at: www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html.
16. Wang, X. and Zhai, C. (2007), “Learn from web search logs to organize search results”, Proceedings of the 30th SIGIR Conference, July 2007, available at: sifaka.cs.uiuc.edu/czhai/pub/sigir07-org.pdf.