Exploring the contribution of information systems user interface design characteristics to adoption process

Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 951-958

  Ozen, Cagla ^a   Basoglu, Nuri ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; QUALITY CONTROL; TAXONOMIES; USER INTERFACES;

ADOPTION PROCESS; CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ICEBERG (CO); IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS (IS); INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ADOPTION; INTERFACE DESIGNS; INTERNATIONAL (CO); PORTLAND; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES; SEMI-STRUCTURED; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 47849088715     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349415     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Ajzen, I.; "From intentions to actions: a theory of planed behavior", Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 11-39, 1985.
2. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, "Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior", Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
3. Benbasat, I., H. Lee and K. Suh, "Effects of task-modality fit on user performance", Decision Support Systems, 32, 27-40, 2001.
4. Borgman, C. L.; "What are digital libraries? Competing visions", Information Processing and Management, 35, 227-243, 1999.
5. Calisir, F and F. Calisir, "The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems", Computers in Human Behavior, 2004.
6. Carroll, J.M., R. L. Mack and W. A. Kellogg, "Human Computer Interaction", Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
7. Chalmers, P. A.; "The role of cognitive theory in human-computer interface", Computers in Human Behavior, 2003.
8. Chen, C., M. Czerwinski and R. Macredie, "Individual differences in virtual environments introduction and overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 499-507, 2000.
9. Davis, F. D.; "A technology acceptance for empirically testing new end user information systems: theory and results", Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
10. Davis, F.D.; "Perceived Usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies,", MIS Quarterly, 13 (13), 1989, pp. 319-340.
11. Davis, F.D., R. Bagozzi and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science 35 (8), 1989, pp. 982-1003.
12. Dillon, A. and C. Watson, "User analysis in HCI the historical lessons from individual difference research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 619-637, 1996.
13. Dishaw, M.T and D. M. Strong, "Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs", Information Management, 1998.
14. Dix, A., J. Finlay, G. Abowd and R. Beale, Human-computer interaction, Prentice Hall, pp. 131-137, 1993.
15. Goodhue, D. L. and R. L. Thompson, "Task-technology fit and individual performance", MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 213-236, 1995.
16. Gyampah, K.A. and A. F. Salam, "An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment", Information & Management 41 (2004) 731-745.
17. Hillstrom, A.P. and Y. Chai, " Factors that are guide or disrupt attentive visual processing", Computers in Human Behavior, 2006.
18. Ingraham, B. and E. Bradburn, "Converting OLF Materials for Use Online Multi-PALIO: A Case Study. Open Learning Foundation, London, 2003.
19. Jackson, C. M., S. Chow and R. A. Leitch, "Toward an understanding of the behavioral intentions to use an information system", Decision Sciences, 28, 357-389, 1997.
20. John, D. and A. Boucouvalas, "Multimedia tasks and user cognitive styles", unpublished.
21. Karahanna, E. and D. W. Straub, "The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use", Information & Management, 35, 237±250, 1999.
22. Kumar, R.L., M. A. Smith and S. Bannerjee, "User interface features influencing overall ease of use and personalization", Information and Management, 2004.
23. Lee, S., G. Heo and S. H. Chang, "Prediction of the human response time with the similarity and quantity of information", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005.
24. Legris, P., J. Ingham and P. Collerette, "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model", Information & Management 40, 191-204, 2003.
25. Lin, H. X., Y. Choong, and G. Salvendy, "A proposed index of usability: a method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems", Behavior & Information Technology, 16(4/5), 267-278, 1997.
26. Lindgaard, G.; "Usability Testing and System Evaluation: A Guide for Designing Useful Computer Systems", London, New York: Chapman & Hall., 1994.
27. Lindgaard, G. and C. Dudek, "What is this evasive beast called user satisfaction?" Interacting with Computers, 15, 429-452, 2003.
28. Meadow, C. T., W. Wang and W. Yuan, "A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 490-505, 1995.
29. Minichiello, V., R. Aroni, E. Timewell and L. Alexander, In-depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis, pp.12, 1995.
30. Moneta, G. and M. Csikszentmihalyi, "The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience", Journal of Personality 64, 275-310, 1996.
31. Ozen, C. and N. Basoglu, "Impact of Man-machine Interaction Factors on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software Design", Proceedings of PICMET'06 Conference, 2006.
32. Park, K. S. and C. H. Lim, "A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface design using usability criteria and measures", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 23, 379-389, 1999.
33. Sun, H. and P. Zang, "The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance", Human-Computer Studies, 2005.
34. Thong, J.Y.L., W. Hong and K. Tam, "Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?", Elsevier, 2002.
35. Van Schaik, P. and J. Ling, "The effects of screen ratio and order on information retrieval in web pages", Displays 24, 187-195, 2003.
36. Venkatesh, V. and F. D. Davis, "A model of antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test", Decision Sciences, 27, pp. 451-481, 1996.
37. Venkatesh, V. and F. D. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, 46, 186-204, 2000.