User interface features influencing overall ease of use and personalization

Information and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 289-302

  Kumar, Ram L ^a   Smith, Michael Alan ^a   Bannerjee, Snehamay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E Business; IS effectiveness; On line shopping; Personalization; User interface design

Indexed keywords

COMPACT DISKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; WEBSITES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PERSONALIZATION;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 0348042910     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00075-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benbunan-Fich R. Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial Web site. Information and Management. 39:2001;151-163.
2. J.M. Carroll, R.L. Mack, W.A. Kellogg, Human Computer Interaction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
3. S.K. Card, Theory-driven design research, in: R.G. Mcmillan, D. Beevis, E. Slas, M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, L. Van Breda (Eds.), Applications of Human Performance Models to System Design, Plenum Press, New York, 1989, pp. 501-509.
4. S.K. Card., J.D. Mackinlay, G.G. Robertson, The design space of input devices, in: Proceedings of CHI'90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 501-509.
5. Card S.K., Moran T.P., Newell A. The keystroke-level model of user performance with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM. 23:1980;396-410.
6. S.K. Card, T.P. Moran, A. Newell, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.
7. K. Cox, D. Walker, User Interface Design, second ed., Prentice Hall, Singapore, 1993.
8. Davis S.A., Bostrom R.P. Training end users: an experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quarterly. 17:1993;61-85.
9. T. Dayton, A. MacFarland, J. Kramer, Bridging user needs to object-oriented GUI prototype via task object design, in: L.E. Wood (Ed.), User Interface Design, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1998, pp. 15-56.
10. H. Hagen, R. Souza, Smart Personalization, The Forrester Report, July 1999.
11. J. Karat, C. Karat, J. Ukelson, Affordances, motivation, and the design of user interfaces, Communications of the ACM 43 (8), 2000, 49-51.
12. Kramer J., Norohna S., Vego S. A user-centered design approach to personalization. Communications of the ACM. 43(8):2000;45-48.
13. J. Lee, M. Podlaseck, E. Schonberg, R. Hoch, S. Gomry, Analysis and Visualization of Metrics for On-line Merchandising. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Advances in Web Usage Tracking and Profiling, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, (to appear) URL: http://www.research.ibm.com/iac/papers/lncs.pdf, accessed 08 November 2003.
14. Lee Juhnyoung, Podlaseck Mark, Schonberg Edith, Gomory Stephen, Understanding merchandising effectiveness of on-line stores, in: Beat F. Schmid, Joze Gricar, Stefan Klein, Brigette Buchet, EM - Selected Papers from 99 Bled. EM - Electronic Markets, vol. 10, no. 1, February 2000. URL: http://www.informationobjects.ch/netacademy/naservice/publications.nsf/all_pk/ 1582, 26 November 2002.
15. Lohse L.G. A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction. 8(4):1993;353-388.
16. Matheison K., Keil M. Beyond the interface: ease of use and task technology fit. Information and Management. 34:1988;221-230.
17. G. Moore, I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research 2 (3), 1991, 191-222.
18. J. Nielson, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, 1999.
19. Norman D.A. Design rules based on analyses of human error. Communications of the ACM. 26(4):1983;254-258.
20. Norman K.L. Models of the mind and machine: information flow and control between computers and humans. Advances in Computers. 32:1991;119-172.
21. D. Peppers, M. Rogers, Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Age of Interactivity, Doubleday, New York, NY, 1997.
22. Polson P., Lewis C. Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction. 5:1990;191-220.
23. B. Schneiderman, Designing the User Interface, Addison Wesley, USA, 1998.
24. Schonberg E., Cofino T., Hoch R., Podlaseck M., Sparagen S.L. Measuring Success. Communications of the ACM. 43(8):2000;53-57.
25. Zhang P., Von Dran G. Web sites that satisfy users: an empirical investigation of Web site interface features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(4):2000;1253-1268.
26. Zhang P., Von Dran G. User expectations and rankings of quality factors in different Web site domains. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 6(2):2001-2002;9-33.