Developing a quality framework for model-driven engineering

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5002 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 275-286

  Mohagheghi, Parastoo ^a   Dehlen, Vegard ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

Metrics; Model driven engineering; Quality; Transformation

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC COMPOUNDS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

HEIDELBERG (CO); LECTURE NOTES; MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING (MDE); MULTI-ABSTRACTION; QUALITY ENGINEERING; QUALITY EVALUATION; QUALITY GOALS; TRANSFORMATION MAPPING; TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES;

MODELS;

EID: 47749139337     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69073-3_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Berenbach, B.: Evaluation of Large, Complex UML Analysis and Design Models. In: 26th Int'l Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004), pp. 232-241 (2004)
2. Claxton, J.C., McDougall, P.A.: Measuring the Quality of Models. In: The Data Administration Newsletter (TDAN.com) (visited on June 22 2007), http://www.tdan.com/i014ht03.htm
3. Cuadrado, J.S., Molina, J.G.: Building Domain-Specific Languages for Model-Driven Development. IEEE Softw. 24(5), 48-55 (2007)
4. Daniels, J.: Modeling with a Sense of Purpose. IEEE Softw. 19(1), 8-10 (2002)
5. Dromey, R.G.: Concerning the Chimera. IEEE Software 13(1), 33-43 (1996)
6. Grossman, M., Aronson, J.E., McCarthy, R.V.: Does UML Make the Grade? Insights from the Software Development Community. Info and Softw Tech. 47, 383-397 (2005)
7. Haesen, R., Snoeck, M.: Implementing Consistency Management Techniques for Conceptual Modeling. In: Third International Workshop, Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development III - Understanding and Usage of Dependency Relationships, pp. 99-113 (2004)
8. Hesse, W.: More Matters on (Meta-) Modeling: Remarks on Thomas KUhne's "Matters". J. Softw Syst Model 5, 387-394 (2006)
9. IBM, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/apr05/brown/ index.html
10. IEEE 610.12 IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
11. ISO- International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 9126-1, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber= 2274
12. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework. In: UML and the Unified Process, pp. 1-22. Idea Group Publishing (2003)
13. Kühne, T.: Matters of (Meta-) Modeling. J. Softw. Syst. Model 5, 369-385 (2006)
14. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Managing Model Quality in UML-based Software Development. In: 13th Int'l Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP 2005), pp. 7-16 (2005)
15. Lange, C.F.J.: Model Size Matters. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, p. 5. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42-49 (1994)
17. Liu, Z., Jifeng, H., Li, X., Chen, Y.: Consistency and Refinement of UML Models. In: Third International Workshop, Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development III - Understanding and Usage of Dependency Relationships, pp. 23-40 (2004)
18. Mellor, S.J., Balcer, M.J.: Executable UML: a Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)
19. Mohagheghi, P., Aagedal, J.Ø.: Evaluating Quality in Model-Driven Engineering. In: Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE 2007), In: Proc. of ICSE 2007, p. 6 (2007)
20. Object Management Group's Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/ mda/
21. Paige, R.F., Ostroff, J.S., Brooke, P.J.: Principles for Modeling Language Design. Info, and Softw. Tech. 42, 665-675 (2000)
22. Saeki, M., Kaiya, H.: Model Metrics and Metrics of Model Transformations. In: The First Workshop on Quality in Modeling, pp. 31-45 (2006)
23. Solheim, I., Neple, T.: Model Quality in the Context of Model-Driven Development. In: 2nd Internationa] Workshop on Model-Driven Enterprise Information Systems (MDEIS 2006), pp. 27-35 (2006)
24. Straeten, R.: Formalizing Behaviour Preserving Dependencies in UML. In: Third International Workshop, Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development III - Understanding and Usage of Dependency Relationships, pp. 71-82 (2004)
25. Trendowicz, A., Punter, T.: Quality Modeling for Software Product Lines. In: 7th ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering (QAOOSE 2003), p. 7 (2003)
26. Unhelkar, B.: Verification and Validation for Quality of UML 2.0 Models. Wiley, Chichester (2005)
27. Verró, D., Pataricza, A.: Generic and Meta-Transformations for Model Transformation Engineering. In: Baar, T., Strohmeier, A., Moreira, A., Mellor, S.J. (eds.) UML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3273, pp. 290-304. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)