Managing model quality in UML-based software development

Proceedings - 13th IEEE International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, STEP 2005

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 7-16

  Lange, Christian F J ^a   Chaudron, Michel R V ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA REDUCTION; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY MODELS; SOFTWARE QUALITY; SOURCE CODES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33947614112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/STEP.2005.16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. K. Balla, T. Bemelmans, R. Kusters, and J. Trienekens. Quality through managed improvement and measurement (QMIM): Towards a phased development and implementation of a quality management system for a software company. Software Quality Journal, 9(3):177-193, November 2001.
2. B. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, October 1981.
3. B. W. Boehm, J. R. Brown, H. Kaspar, M. Lipow, G. J. Macleod, and M. J. Merrit. Characteristics of Software Quality, volume 1 of TRW Series of Software Technology. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978.
4. S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer. A metrics suite for object-oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6):476-493, 1994.
5. S. Easterbrook and B. Nuseibeh. Using ViewPoints for inconsistency management. BCS/IEE Software Engineering Journal, pages 31-43, January 1996.
6. N. E. Fenton and S. L. Pfleeger. Software Metrics, A Rigorous and Practical Approach. Thomson Computer Press, second edition, 1996.
7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley, 1994.
8. D. Garvin. What does 'product quality' really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1):25-45, 1984.
9. ISO/IED FCD 9126-1.2. Information Technology - Software Product Quality, part i: quality model edition, 1998.
10. S. H. Kan. Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Addison Wesley Professional, 2nd edition, September 2002.
11. C. F. J. Lange. Empirical investigations in software architecture completeness. Master's thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, September 2003. No. 969.
12. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. An empirical assessment of completeness in UML designs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'04), pages 111-121, 2004.
13. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. Effects of defects in UML models - an experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'06). ACM, May 2006.
14. T. J. McCabe. A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4):308-320, 1976.
15. J. A. McCall, P. K. Richards, and G. F. Walters. Factors in Software Quality, volume vol 1-3 of AD/A-049-015/055. Springfield, 1977.
16. J. Muskens, C. F. J. Lange, and M. R. V. Chaudron. Experiences in applying architecture and design metrics in multi-view models. In Proceedings of EURO MI-CRO 2004, Rennes, France, August 2004.
17. Object Management Group. MDA Guide, Version 1.0.1, omg/03-06-01 edition, June 2003.
18. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language, Adopted Final Specification, Version 2.0, ptc/03-09-15 edition, December 2003.
19. H. C. Purchase, L. Colpoys, M. McGill, D. Carrington, and C. Britton. UML class diagram syntax: an empirical study of comprehension. In Australian symposium on Information visualisation, volume 9, pages 113-120, September 2001.
20. H. D. Rombach. Quantitative Bewertung von Software-Qualitäts- Merkmalen auf Basis struktureller Kenngrössen. Phd thesis, Universität Kaiserslautern, June 1984.
21. J. Wüst. The software design metrics tool for the UML, version 1.3. http://www.sdmetrics.com.