Evaluating quality in model-driven engineering

Proceedings - ICSE 2007 Workshops: International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, MISE'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Mohagheghi, Parastoo ^a   Aagedal, Jan ^a  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

HIGH QUALITY SYSTEMS; MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING (MDE);

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 36949021970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/MISE.2007.6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. th Int'l Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '04), pp. 232-241, 2004.
2. Clark, T., A. Evans, P. Sammut, and J. Willans, Applied Metamodelling- A Foundation for Language Driven Development, Version 0.1, Accessible at http://www.xactium.com, 2004.
3. EmpAnADa project, http://www.win.tue.nl/empanada/, last visited on 14 January 2007.
4. J. Krogstie, O.I. Lindland, and G. Sindre, "Defining Quality Aspects for Conceptual Models", In E. D. Falkenberg, W. Hesse, & A. Olive (Eds.). Proc. the IFIP8.1 working conference on Information Systems Concepts (ISC03); Towards a Consolidation of Views, pp. 216-231, 1995.
5. J. Krogstie, "Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework", chapter in UML and the Unified Process, Idea Group Publishing, pp. 1-22, 2003.
6. Krogstie, J., and A. Sølvberg, Information System Engineering: Conceptual Modelling in a Quality Perspective, Kompendiumforlaget, Trondheim, Norway, 2003.
7. th Int'l Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP'05), pp. 7-16, 2005.
8. MODELWARE reports "D2.3 MDD Maturity Levels Definition" and "D2.8 MDD Process Framework", accessible at http://www.modelware-ist. org/, 2006.
9. OMG SysML™, http://www.sysml.org/, last visited on 17 January 2007.
10. M. Peleg, and D. Dori, "The Model Multiplicity Problem: Experimenting with Real-Time Specification Methods"; IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, 26(8), pp. 742-759, 2000.
11. H.C. Purchase, L. Colpoys, M. McGill, D. Carrington, and C. Britton, "UML Class Diagram Syntax: An Empirical Study of Comprehension", Proc. Australian Symposium on Information Visualization, Volume 9, pp. 113-120, 2001.
12. M. Rossi, and S. Brinkkemper, "Complexity Metrics for System Development Methods and Techniques", Information Systems, 21(2), pp. 209-227, 1996.
13. K. Siau, and Y. Tian, "The Complexity of Unified Modeling Language: A GOMS Analysis", Proc. Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 443-447, 2001.
14. nd International Workshop on Model-Driven Enterprise Information Systems (MDEIS'06), pp. 27-35, 2006.
15. G.H. Travassos, F. Shull, M. Fredericks, and V.R. Basili, "Detecting Defects in Object-Oriented Designs: Using Reading Techniques to Increase Software Quality", Proc. OOPSLA'99, pp. 47-56, in ACMSIGPLANNotices, 34(10), Oct. 1999.
16. Unhelkar, B., Verification and Validation for Quality of UML 2.0 Models, Wiley, 2005.
17. Østbø, M., Anvendelse av UML til Dokumentering av Generiske Systemer, Master thesis in Norwegian with the title: Applying UML to the Documentation of Generic Systems. University of Stavanger, 2001.