Robust identification and feedback design: An active noise control case study

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1265-1274

  Sanchez Pena R S ^a,b   Cuguero M A ^a   Masip, A ^a   Quevedo, J ^a   Puig, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Active noise control; H control; Mixed sensitivity; Parametric nonparametric models; Robust identification

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES CONTROL; ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL; CONTROL THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); ROBUST CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL (ANC); APPLIED (CO); CASE STUDIES; CONTROL APPROACHES; ELSEVIER (CO); EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS; FEEDBACK DESIGNS; IN ORDER; INHERENT LIMITATIONS; NOISE CONTROLLED; NOISE SOURCES; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS; ROBUST ANALYSIS; ROBUST IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEMATIC CONTROL;

MILITARY DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 47749110186     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ayala Botto M., Sousa J.M.C., and Sá da Costa J.M.G. Intelligent active noise control applied to a laboratory railway coach model. Control Engineering Practice 13 4 (2005) 473-484
2. ∞ synthesis technique. Journal of Sound and Vibration 206 4 (1997) 453-471
3. ∞ theory. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 1 (1998) 237-247
4. Baldelli D., Mazzaro M.C., and Sánchez Peña R.S. Robust identification of lightly damped flexible structures by means of orthonormal bases. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 9 5 (2001)
5. Ball, J., Gohberg, I., & Rodman, L. (1990). Interpolation of rational matrix functions. Operator theory: advances and applications (Vol. 45). Birkhäuser.
6. Carmona J.C., and Alvarado V. ANC of a duct using robust control theory. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 8 6 (2000) 930-938
7. ∞ approach (2000), Wiley Inter-Science, New york
8. Devasia S. Should model-based inverse inputs be used as feedforward under plant uncertainty?. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 47 11 (2002) 1865-1871
9. Doyle J.C., Francis B., and Tannembaum A. Feedback control theory (1992), Macmillan, Maxwell
10. Dozio L., and Mantegazza P. General-purpose processors for active vibro-acoustic control: Discussion and experiences. Control Engineering Practice 15 2 (2007) 163-176
11. Freudenberg J., Hollot C., Middleton R., and Toochinda V. Fundamental design limitations of the general control configuration. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 48 8 (2003) 1355-1370
12. Freudenberg J., and Looze D. Right half plane poles and zeros and design tradeoffs in feedback systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 30 6 (1985) 555-565
13. Hansen, C. H. (2004). Current and future industrial applications of active noise control. In ACTIVE 04 (pp. 1-18) (Plenary talk).
14. ∞. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 36 10 (1991)
15. Hong J., Akers J., Venugopal R., Lee M., Sparks A., Washabaugh P., et al. Modeling, identification and feedback control noise in an acoustic duct. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 4 3 (1996) 283-291
16. Hong J., and Bernstein D. Bode integral constraints, colocation, and spillover in active noise and vibration control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 6 1 (1998)
17. Kaiser O., Pietrzko S., and Morari M. Feedback control of sound transmission through a double glazed window. Journal of Sound and Vibration 263 4 (2003) 775-795
18. ∞ control. In Proceedings of 42nd IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas (pp. 3900-3904).
19. Kuo S., and Morgan D. Active noise control systems: Algorithms and DSP implementations (1995), Wiley, New York
20. ∞ design of robust active noise controllers for an acoustic duct system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 8 5 (2000) 864-872
21. Lueg, P. (1934). Process of silencing sound oscillations. U.S. Patent 043,416.
22. Mäkilä P., Partington J., and Gustafsson T. Worst-case control-relevant identification. Automatica 31 12 (1995)
23. Mazzaro M.C., Parrilo P.A., and Sánchez Peña R.S. Robust identification toolbox. Latin American Applied Research 34 2 (2004) 91-100
24. Nelson P., and Elliot S. Active control of sound (1992), Academic Press, New york
25. ∞ Active noise control of fan noise in an acoustic duct. In Proceedings of American control conference. Chicago (pp. 3028-3032).
26. Olson H., and May E. Electronic sound absorber. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 25 (1953) 1130-1136
27. Parrilo P.A., Sánchez Peña R.S., and Sznaier M. A parametric extension of mixed time/frequency robust identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 44 2 (1999) 364-369
28. Parrilo P.A., Sznaier M., Sánchez Peña R.S., and Inanc T. Mixed time/frequency-domain based robust identification. Automatica 34 11 (1998) 1375-1389
29. Pota, H., & Petersen, I. (2000). Experiments in Feedback control of an acoustic duct. In International conference on control applications.
30. ∞ active control of sound in a headrest: Design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 7 1 (1999) 79-84
31. Reinelt W., Garulli A., and Ljung L. Comparing different approaches to model error modeling in robust identification. Automatica 38 (2002) 787-803
32. Sánchez Peña R.S., and Sznaier M. Robust systems theory and applications (1998), Wiley, New York
33. Serón M., Braslavsky J., and Goodwin G. Fundamental limitations in filtering and control (1997), Springer, Berlin
34. Toochinda, V., Hollot, C., & Chait, Y. (2002). Disturbance attenuation in a SITO feedback control system. In American control conference.
35. ∞ hybrid active controller for acoustic duct noise cancellation. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration 1 3/4 (2005) 183-193
36. Yuan J. Improving robustness of active noise control in ducts. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 114 1 (2005) 210-217
37. Zhou K., Doyle J.C., and Glover K. Feedback control theory (1996), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs