Comparison of active noise control structures in the presence of acoustical feedback by using the H∞ synthesis technique

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 206, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 453-471

  Bai, M R ^a   Lin, H H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROL THEORY; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; DUCTS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL; FEEDFORWARD CONTROL;

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES CONTROL;

EID: 0031549571     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1101     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S. J. ELLIOT and P. A. NELSON 1993 IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 10, 12-35. Active noise control.
2. C. R. FULLER and A. H. VON FLOTOW 1995 IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2, 9-19. Active control of sound and vibration.
3. J. C. BURGESS 1981 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70, 715-726. Active adaptive sound control in a duct: a computer simulation.
4. L. J. ERIKSSON 1990 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 257-265. Development of the filter-u algorithm for active noise control.
5. V. EGHTESADI and H. G. LEVENTHALL 1982 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71, 608-611. Active attenuation of noise: the monopole system.
6. ∞ control problems.
7. ∞ control.
8. ∞ optimal linear control and filtering.
9. J. C. DOYLE, B. A. FRANCIS and A. R. TANNENBAUM 1992 Feedback Control Theory. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
10. F. B. YEH and C. D. YANG 1992 Post Modern Control Theory And Design. New York: Eurasia.
11. ∞ controllers.
12. S. M. KUO and D. R. MORGAN 1996 Active Noise Control Systems Algorithms and DSP Implementations. New York: John Wiley.
13. M. MORARI and E. ZAFIRIOU 1989 Robust Process Control. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
14. H. IMAI and H. HAMADA 1995 Proceedings of International Symposium on Active Control of Sound and Vibration, '95 875-880. Active noise control system based on the hybrid design of feedback and feedforward control.
15. R. GUELER, A. H. FLOTOW and D. W. VOS 1993 Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 16, 662-667. Passive damping for robust feedback control of flexible structures.
16. G. F. FRANKLIN, J. D. POWELL and A. EMAMI-NAEINI 1994 Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
17. L. LJUNG 1987 System Identification: Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
18. J. HONG, J. C. AKERS, R. VENUGOPAL, M. N. LEE, A. G. SPARKS, P. D. WASHABAUGH and D. S. BERNSTEIN 1996 IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 4, 283-291. Modeling, identification and feedback control noise in an acoustic duct.
19. A. J. HULL, C. R. RADCLIFFE and S. C. SOUTHWARD 1993 ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 115, 488-494. Global active noise control of a one-dimensional acoustic duct using a feedback controller.
20. L. J. ERIKSSON and M. C. ALLIE 1989 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 797-802. Use of random noise for on-line transducer modeling in an adaptive active attenuation system.