Activation and deactivation processes in the postponed intention paradigm

Psychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-97

  Meilán, Juan J G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Intention; Intentional superiority effect; Motivation; Prospective memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 47649128661     PISSN: 00332852     EISSN: 13475916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2008.89     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, J. R. 1983. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (Eds.). 1996. Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum
3. Dockree, P. M., & Ellis, J. A. 2001. Forming and cancelling everyday intentions: Implications for prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1139-1143.
4. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. 1990. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717-726.
5. Freeman, J. E., & Ellis, J. A. 2003. The intention-superiority-effect for naturally occurring activities: the role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adults. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 215-228.
6. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. 1993. Representation of intention: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 1211-1226
7. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. 1996. Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53-91). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Jahn, P., & Engelkamp, J. 2003. Design-effects in prospective and retrospective memory for actions. Experimental Psychology, 50, 4-15.
9. Lebiere, Ch., & Lee, F. J. 2002. Intention superiority effect: A context-switching account. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 57-65.
10. Mäntylä, T. 1996. Activating actions and interrupting intentions: Mechanisms of retrieval sensitization in prospective memory. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 93-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bink, M. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 350-361.
12. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bryan, E. 1999. The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320-327.
13. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R., & Della Salla, S. 2000. Retrieval of performed versus to-be-performed tasks: A naturalistic study of the intention-superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S83-S98.
14. Meilán, J. J. G., & Carro, J. 2004. Shopping as an example of intention memory: the sequence in the execution of a prospective task and its predictors. Psicología General y Aplicada, 57, 343-360.
15. Meilán, J. J. G., & Mateos, P. M. 2002. Schemes in Spanish: the representation, in the form of scripts, of five daily tasks by young people and elderly people. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 55, 161-185.
16. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. 1978. Priming in item recognition. Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 17, 403-417.
17. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.