Design-Effects in Prospective and Retrospective Memory for Actions

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-15

  Jahn, Petra ^a   Engelkamp, Johannes ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Free recall; Item specific and relational information; Mixed list design; Planning task; Pure list design; Recognition; Self performed task

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037264782     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027//1618-3169.50.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brickenkamp, R. (1962). Test d2. Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test (Test d2. Test of attentional capacities). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
2. Brooks, B. M., & Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks. Memory and Cognition, 22, 27-33.
3. Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory and Cognition, 11, 575-582.
4. Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., & Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987). Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others? Memory and Cognition, 15, 109-118.
5. DeLosh, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1136-1146.
6. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes. New York: Springer.
7. Engelkamp, J. (1995). Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 227-240.
8. Engelkamp, J. (1997a). Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks. Memory and Cognition, 25, 117-124.
9. Engelkamp, J. (1997b). Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks in recall and recognition memory. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for action. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
11. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 671-682.
12. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43-60.
13. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
14. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
15. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Nussbaum, A. (1990). Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory and Cognition, 18, 568-578.
16. Kormi-Nouri, R., Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G (1994). The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of self-performed tasks and verbal tasks. Memory and Cognition, 22, 723-728.
17. McDaniel, M. A., DeLosh, E. L., & Merritt, P. (2000). Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: Recall of common versus bizarre material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1045-1056.
18. Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 54-69.
19. Mulligan, N. W. (2000). Perceptual interference and memory for order. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 680-697.
20. Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 702-709.
21. Norris, M., & West, R. (1993). Activity memory and aging. The role of motor retrieval and strategic processing. Psychology and Aging, 8, 81-86.
22. Olofsson, U. (1997). Win some, lose some: Hypermnesia for actions reflects item-specific processing. Memory and Cognition, 25, 797-800.
23. Saltz, E. (1988). The role of motoric enactment (M-processing) in memory for words and sentences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Vol. 1 (pp. 408-414). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
24. Saltz, E., & Dixon, D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77-92.
25. Serra, M., & Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order distinction. Memory and Cognition, 21, 34-40.
26. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
27. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379-402.