Microstructural analysis of foam by use of NMR R2 dispersion

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 193, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 286-296

  Baete, S H ^a,b   De Deene, Y ^a,b   Masschaele, B ^b   De Neve, W ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Foam; Internal gradients; Microstructure; Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging; R2 dispersion; Random walk; Relaxometry; Surface relaxation

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; SPIN-SPIN RELAXATION;

SPIN DYNAMICS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GAS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SPIN LABELING;

ALGORITHMS; GASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 47549119246     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: 10960856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Christman R., Ailion D., Case T., Durney C., Cutillo A., Shioya S., Goodrich K., and Morris A. Comparison of calculated and experimental nmr spectral broadening for lung tissue. Magn. Res. Med. 35 (1996) 6-13
2. Durney C., Cutillo A., and Ailion D. Magnetic resonance behavior of normal and diseased lungs: spherical shell model simulations. J. Appl. Physiol. 88 (2000) 1155-1166
3. Weire D., and Hutzler S. The Physics of Foam (1999), Clarendon Press, Oxford
4. Neuman C. Spin echo of spins diffusing in a bounded medium. J. Chem. Phys. 60 11 (1974) 4508-4511
5. Brown R.J.S., and Fantazzini P. Conditions for initial quasi-linear t(2)(-1) versus tau for Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill nmr with diffusion and susceptibility differences in porous-media and tissues. Phys. Rev. B 47 22 (1993) 14823-14834
6. Weisskoff R., Zuo C., Boxerman J., and Rosen B. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation-theory and experiment. Magn. Res. Med. 31 (1994) 601-610
7. Hurlimann M.D., Helmer K.G., Latour L.L., and Sotak C.H. Restricted diffusion in sedimentary-rocks-determination of surface-area-to-volume ratio and surface relaxivity. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 111 2 (1994) 169-178
8. Borgia G., Brown R., and Fantazzinni P. Scaling of spin-echo amplitudes with frequency, diffusion coefficient, pore size, and susceptibility difference for the NMR of fluids in porous media and biological tissues. Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 2104-2114
9. 2. Magn. Res. Imaging 14 (1996) 761-767
10. Borgia G., Brown R., and Fantazzini P. The effect of diffusion and susceptibility differences on t-2 measurements for fluids in porous media and biological tissues. Magn. Res. Imaging 14 (1996) 731-736
11. Slijkerman W., and Hofman J. Determination of surface relaxivity from NMR diffusion measurements. Magn. Res. Imaging 16 (1998) 541-544
12. Sen P.N., Andre A., and Axelrod S. Spin echoes of nuclear magnetization diffusing in a constant magnetic field gradient and in a restricted geometry. J. Chem. Phys. 111 14 (1999) 6548-6555
13. Jensen J.H., and Chandra R. Strong field behavior of the nmr signal from magnetically heterogeneous tissues. Magn. Reson. Med. 43 2 (2000) 226-236
14. Jensen J.H., and Chandra R. Nmr relaxation in tissues with weak magnetic inhomogeneities. Magn. Reson. Med. 44 1 (2000) 144-156
15. Axelrod S., and Sen P.N. Nuclear magnetic resonance spin echoes for restricted diffusion in an inhomogeneous field: methods and asymptotic regimes. J. Chem. Phys. 114 15 (2001) 6878-6895
16. Dunn K. Enhanced relaxation in porous media due to internal field gradients. J. Magn. Res. 156 (2002) 171-180
17. Zielinski L.J., and Sen P.N. Combined effects of diffusion, nonuniform-gradient magnetic fields, and restriction on an arbitrary coherence pathway. J. Chem. Phys. 119 2 (2003) 1093-1104
18. Zhang G.Q., and Hirasaki G.J. Cpmg relaxation by diffusion with constant magnetic field gradient in a restricted geometry: numerical simulation and application. J. Magn. Reson. 163 1 (2003) 81-91
19. Zielinski L.J. Effect of internal gradients in the nuclear magnetic resonance measurement of the surface-to-volume ratio. J. Chem. Phys. 121 1 (2004) 352-361
20. Radlinski A., Ioannidis M., Hinde A., Hainbuchner M., Baron M., Rauch H., and Kline S. Angrstrom-to-millimeter characterization of sedimentary rock microstructure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 274 (2004) 607-612
21. Fantazzinni P., and Brown R. Initially linear echo-spacing dependence of 1/T2 measurements in many porous media with pore-scale inhomogeneous fields. J. Magn. Res. 177 (2005) 228-235
22. Chen Q., Marble A., Colpitts B., and Balcom B. The internal magnetic field distribution, and single exponential magnetic resonance free induction decay, in rocks. J. Magn. Res. 175 (2005) 300-308
23. Lisitza N.V., Warren W.S., and Song Y.Q. Study of diffusion in erythrocyte suspension using internal magnetic field inhomogeneity. J. Magn. Reson. 187 (2007) 146-154
24. Balinov B., Jönsson B., Linse P., and Söderman O. The NMR self-diffusion method applied to restricted diffusion simulation of echo attenuation from molecules in spheres and between planes. J. Magn. Res. A 104 (1993) 17-25
25. Sen P., Schwartz L., Mitra P., and Halperin B. Surface relaxation and the long-time diffusion coefficient in porous media: periodic geometries. Phys. Rev. B 49 1 (1994) 215-225
26. Bergman D.J., Dunn K.J., Schwartz L.M., and Mitra P.P. Self-diffusion in a periodic porous-medium-a comparison of different approaches. Phys. Rev. E 51 4 (1995) 3393-3400
27. Duh A., Mohoric A., and Stepisnik J. Computer simulation of the spin-echo spatial distribution in the case of restricted self-diffusion. J. Magn. Res. 148 (2001) 257-266
28. Toumelin E., Torres-Verdin C., Sun B., and Dunn K.J. Random-walk technique for simulating nmr measurements and 2d nmr maps of porous media with relaxing and permeable boundaries. J. Magn. Reson. 188 (2007) 83-96
29. Lambert J., Cantat I., Delannay R., Renault A., Graner F., Glazier J.A., Veretennikov I., and Cloetens P. Extraction of relevant physical parameters from 3d images of foams obtained by X-ray tomography. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 263 1-3 (2005) 295-302
30. von der Schulenburg D.A.G., Paterson-Beedle M., Macaskie L.E., Gladden L.F., and Johns M.L. Flow through an evolving porous media-compressed foam. J. Materials Sci. 42 16 (2007) 6541-6548
31. Durian D.J., Weitz D.A., and Pine D.J. Scaling behavior in shaving cream. Phys. Rev. A 44 12 (1991) R7902-R7905
32. Monnereau C., and Vignes-Adler M. Dynamics of 3d real foam coarsening. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 23 (1998) 5228-5231
33. Magrabi S.A., Dlugogorski B.Z., and Jameson G.J. Bubble size distribution and coarsening of aqueous foams. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 18 (1999) 4007-4022
34. Fetterman M.R., Tan E., Ying L., Stack R.A., Marks D.L., Feller S., Cull E., Sullivan J.M., Munson D.C., Thoroddsen S.T., and Brady D.J. Tomographic imaging of foam. Optics Express 7 5 (2000) 186-197
35. Ganan-Calvo A.M., Fernandez J.M., Oliver A.M., and Marquez M. Coarsening of monodisperse wet microfoams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 24 (2004) 4989-4991
36. Prause B.A., Glazier J.A., Gravina S.J., and Montemagno C.D. 3-dimensional magnetic-resonance-imaging of a liquid foam. J. Phys. Condensed Matter 7 40 (1995) L511-L516
37. Gonatas C.P., Leigh J.S., Yodh A.G., Glazier J.A., and Prause B. Magnetic-resonance images of coarsening inside a foam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3 (1995) 573-576
38. Baldwin C.A., Sederman A.J., Mantle M.D., Alexander P., and Gladden L.F. Determination and characterization of the structure of a pore space from 3d volume images. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 181 1 (1996) 79-92
39. Chauvaux B., Dereppe J.M., and Huis R. Micro-imaging by magnetic resonance on flexible polyurethane foams. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14 7-8 (1996) 937-939
40. Kose K. 3d nmr imaging of foam structures. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 118 2 (1996) 195-201
41. Szayna M., and Voelkel R. Nmr microscopy of polyurethane foams. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 15 2 (1999) 99-102
42. Hills B. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Food Science (1998), Wiley InterScience, New York
43. Assink R.A., Caprihan A., and Fukushima E. Density profiles of a draining foam by nuclear magnetic-resonance imaging. Aiche J. 34 12 (1988) 2077-2079
44. McCarthy M.J. Interpretation of the magnetic-resonance-imaging signal from a foam. Aiche J. 36 2 (1990) 287-290
45. Pilhofer G., Lee H.-C., McCarthy M., Tong P., and German J. Functionality of milk fat on foam formation and stability. J. Dairy Sci. 77 (1993) 55-63
46. De Deene Y., Hanselaer P., De Wagter C., Achten E., and De Neve W. An investigation of the chemical stability of a monomer/polymer gel dosimeter. Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) 859-878
47. Schenck J. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med. Phys. 23 6 (1996) 815-850
48. Bhagwandien R., van Ee R., Beersma R., Bakker C., Moerland M., and Lagendijk J. Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. Magn. Res. Imaging 10 (1992) 299-313
49. Bhagwandien R., Moerland M., Bakker C., Beersma R., and Lagendijk J. Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. Magn. Res. Imaging 12 (1994) 101-107
50. Marques J., and Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concept. Magn. Res. B 25B (2005) 65-78
51. Koch K., Papademetris X., Rothman D., and de Graaf R. Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic response. Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (2006) 6381-6402
52. Brakke K. The surface evolver. Exp. Math. 1 (1992) 141-165
53. De Deene Y., Vergote K., Claeys C., and De Wagter C. Three dimensional radiation dosimetry in lung-equivalent regions by use of a radiation sensitive gel foam: proof of principle. Med. Phys. 7 (2006) 2586-2597
54. De Deene Y., Van de Walle R., Achten E., and De Wagter C. Mathematical analysis and experimental investigation of noise in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging applied in polymer gel dosimetry. Signal Process. 70 (1998) 85-101
55. Stejskal E., and Tanner J. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965) 288-292