Presentation format effects in a levels-of-processing task

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 215-227

  Foos, Paul W ^a   Goolkasian, Paula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Format effects; Levels of processing; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 47549108667     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.215     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baddeley, A.D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139-152.
2. Bower, G.H., & Karlin, M.B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751-757.
3. Cleary, A.M., & Greene, R.L. (2002). Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory. Memory, 10, 55-61.
4. Cowan, N., Saults, J.S., Elliott, E.M., & Moreno, M. (2002). De-confounding serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 153-177.
5. Craik, F.I.M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present, and future. Memory, 10, 305-318.
6. Craik, F.I.M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F.I.M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 261-280). New York: Plenum.
7. Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
8. Craik, F.I.M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
9. Crowder, R.G. (1972). Visual and auditory memory. In J.F. Kavanaugh & I.G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relations between speech and learning to read (pp. 251-275). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Eysenck, M.W. (1974). Age differences in incidental learning. Developmental Psychology, 10, 936-941.
11. Eysenck, M.W., & Eysenck, M.C. (1979). Processing depth, elaboration of encoding, memory stores, and extended processing capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 472-484.
12. Foos, P.W., & Goolkasian, P. (2005). Presentation format effects in working memory: The role of attention. Memory and Cognition, 33, 499-513.
13. Gallo, D.A., McDermott, K.B., Percer, J.M., & Roediger, H.L., III (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339-353.
14. Gardiner, J.M., Gardiner, M.M., & Gregg, V.H. (1983). The auditory recency advantage in longer term free recall is not enhanced by recalling prerecency items first. Memory and Cognition, 11, 616-620.
15. Gathercole, S.E., & Conway, M.A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalization leads to best retention. Memory & Cognition, 16, 110-119.
16. Goolkasian, P., & Foos, P.W. (2002). Presentation format and its effects on working memory. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1096-1105.
17. Goolkasian, P., & Park, D.C. (1980). Processing of visually presented clock times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 707-717.
18. Greene, R.L. (1985). Constraints on the long-term modality effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 526-541.
19. Greene, R.L., & Crowder, R.G. (1986). Recency effects in delayed recall of mouthed stimuli. Memory and Cognition, 14, 355-360.
20. Greene, R.L., Elliott, C.L., & Smith, M.D. (1988). When do interleaved suffixes improve recall? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 560-571.
21. Hyde, T.S., & Jenkins, J.J. (1969). The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472-481.
22. [not in text]Intraub, H. (1984). Conceptual masking: The effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 115-125.
23. Intraub, H., & Nicklos, S. (1985). Levels of processing and picture memory: The physical superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 284-298.
24. Johnston, W.A., & Heinz, S.P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 420-435.
25. Kellogg, R.T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 913-919.
26. Konstantinou, I., & Gardiner, J.M. (2005). Conscious control and memory awareness when recognizing famous faces. Memory, 13, 449-457.
27. Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Kroll, J.F., & Corrigan, A. (1981). Strategies in sentence-picture verification: The effect of an unexpected picture. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 515-531.
29. Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
30. Lockhart, R.S. (2002). Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory, 10, 397-403.
31. McBride, D.M., & Dosher, B.A. (2002). A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: A process dissociation analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 423-460.
32. Mandler, G. (2002). Organization: What levels of processing are levels of. Memory, 10, 333-338.
33. Morris, D.C., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
34. Nelson, D.L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Nelson, D.L., Reed, V.S., & McEvoy, C. (1977). Encoding strategy and sensory and semantic interference. Memory and Cognition, 5, 462-467.
36. Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory and Cognition, 3, 63-647.
37. Paivio, A. (1978). A dual coding approach to perception and cognition. In H.L. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 39-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Pellegrino, J.W., Rosinski, R.R., Chiesi, H.L., & Siegel, A. (1977). Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models, Memory and Cognition, 5, 383-396.
39. Penney, C.G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
40. Posner, M.I., Nissen, M.J., & Klein, R.M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
41. Smith, M.C., & Magee, L.E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
42. Watkins, M.J. (2002). Limits and province of levels of processing: Considerations of a construct. Memory, 10, 339-343.
43. Wippich, W., Melzer, A., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (1998). Picture or word superiority effects in implicit memory: Levels of processing, attention, and retrieval constraints. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 33-46.